Cognitive - Practical Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what was the IV?

A

interference time (s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what was the DV?

A

correct or incorrect recall of trigram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the aim?

A
  1. To test whether interference prevents rehearsal in the Short-Term Memory (STM).
    Aim:
  2. To test whether there is a decay in information held in the Short-Term Memory
    (STM) when rehearsal is prevented.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the experimental hypothesis?

A

There will be a significant decrease in the number of three letter nonsense
Experimental Hypothesis:
trigrams correctly recalled when given an interference task of 18 seconds compared to when given an interference task of 3 seconds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the null hypothesis?

A

There will be no diff. in the no. of correct recall of 3 letter nonsense trigrams when given an interference task of 18 seconds compared to 3 seconds, any diff. will be due to chance and not the interference task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the method?

A

Participants will complete a laboratory experiment for their experiment looking at interference on memory. This is because it is the most appropriate experimental method to test the hypothesis (A01). A lab experiment means that extraneous variables, such as distractions from anything outside of the study, setting can be controlled. A laboratory experiment is a better choice than a field experiment as if the study was to be replicated in the future, then a laboratory experiment will allow for high reliability due to having a standardised procedure (A02).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the procedure?

A

In their laboratory experiment, participants will be asked to remember 10 trigrams that they see for 15 seconds in total. The trigrams will be 3 consonants (E.g. MHS, RFK). Then, there will be a delay between recall, during which time they will perform an interference task of counting backwards from 100 in 3’s.

This reduces the chances of them using rehearsal techniques. The delay between being shown the trigrams & being sked to recall them will vary at the two intervals: Condition A: 3 seconds & Condition B: 18 seconds. Participants will then try to recall the trigrams. The number of trigrams recalled by the participants will be recorded (Quantitative data).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the sample?

A

In their laboratory experiment, participants will be asked to remember 10 trigrams that they see for 15 seconds in total. The trigrams will be 3 consonants (E.g. MHS, RFK). Then, there will be a delay between recall, during which time they will perform an interference task of counting backwards from 100 in 3’s.
Procedure:
This reduces the chances of them using rehearsal techniques. The delay between being shown the trigrams & being asked to recall them will vary at the two intervals: Condition A: 3 seconds & Condition B: 18 seconds. Participants will then try to recall the trigrams. The number of trigrams recalled by the participants will be recorded (Quantitative data).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the experimental design?

A

A repeated measures design will be used in the study looking into interference on recall of trigrams to make the experiment more efficient & to improve validity be avoiding individual differences between 2 groups (This may be present if an independent measures design is used - Therefore a design decision will be made to complete a repeated measures design). All participants will complete the study twice (Once for each condition of the Independent Variable (Condition A: 3 seconds & Condition B: 18 seconds interference task).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was the IV, DV and operationalised variable/s?

A

Independent Variable: The interference time in seconds (Condition A: 3 Seconds
& Condition B: 18 Seconds).
Dependent Variable: The number of 3 letter nonsense trigrams recalled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

give 2 controls we implemented:

A

A notice will be placed on the classroom door to ensure that nobody enters the room whilst the experiment is taking place meaning that the participants will not be distracted (A1). This will increase the reliability of the results due to controlling the extraneous variables (AO2) (Situational Variable).

Clear standardised instructions will be given to the participants during their brief of the study to avoid misunderstanding & confusion & to ensure that everyone receives the same instructions & to avoid experimenter bias (Experimenter Effects). This will ensure that our results are reliable (A01). This means that the experiment will be high in reliability & can be easily replicated (A02) (Participant Variable).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what were 2 of the ethical and considerations? and were there any ethical improvements?

A

Verbal consent will be gained by participants before the experiment begins.
Informed consent will not be possible as we do not want participants to guess the aim of the study (To test whether interference prevents rehearsal in the Short-Term Memory (STM) & to test whether there is a decay in information held in the Short-Term Memory (STM) when rehearsal is prevented (AO1). Due to this not being informed consent, participants will be given the opportunity to remove their results from the study after they are debriefed on the true aims (A02).

participants will have the right to withdraw from the experiment at all times whilst it is taking place (A02).
No participant names will be attached to the results of the study, therefore protecting the identity of the participants & their results (A01). This means that all participant information will be kept confidential (A02).

no ethical improvements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

give 2 points from risk management:

A

Risk to the researcher will be minimised by completing the experiment in a familiar environment to the participants & the researcher, allowing them to feel comfortable & positive when taking part in the study & to avoid any participants reacting negatively. The researcher will be able to rectify anything that goes wrong if they are in a familiar environment.

Risk to others is minimised by using a volunteer sample in a laboratory experiment in a controlled environment close to where they spend their day to day lives to ensure that the participants taking place want to do the study & have time to do it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

in terms of evaluation give the generalisability points

A

The results from the interference study are generalisable to the target population of [$ participants aged 16 & over from the local area (Including men & women & a mix of ages & races) (A2) because the study included students from a school in the local area with participants of a range of genders, races & ages (AO1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

give the generalisability improvement point:

A

One generalisability improvement for this experiment measuring interference on memory could be to complete the study on a larger sample of participants
(AO2). This would allow the results to be generalised to a larger cross-section of the population, rather than just of the local area but on the UK as a whole.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

give the points from reliability:

A

The results are high in reliability as quantitative data was used by counting the number of trigrams that each participant could remember after the interreference tasks (A2). This can be easily analysed for patterns & trends about how significantly people’s memory delays after taking part in interreference tasks of 3 & 18 seconds (A01).

High reliability was also ensured as all participants saw the same trigrams & had the same length interference tasks in the same order (3 seconds, then 18 seconds) (A02). Therefore, a full standardised procedure was employed, increasing the reliability & making it easier to replicate as the same procedure can be used & compared (A01).

17
Q

what is the reliability improvement point?

A

it is low as we did not close the blinds, so this could have acted as an extraneous variable as something outside may have distracted the participants.

18
Q

what are the validity points?

A

A valid strength of our research was that participants completed the experiment on recall of nonsense trigrams in their Psychology classroom, this is a natural environment to the participants allowing them to feel relaxed & comfortable therefore increasing the ecological validityAO2). Therefore, it is likely that the results will be realistic to the participants normal abilities to perform in studies containing interference tasks (A01).

Another valid strength was the use of quantitative data, using numerical values (How many nonsense trigrams that participants could remember after an interference task) (A02). Therefore, this will provide objective & valid results about a participants memory span (A01).

19
Q

what are the validity improvements?

A

An improvement to the validity of the Cognitive Practical could be to use an independent measures design (A02). This would eliminate any demand characteristics from within the study as participants would not be able to guess the aim of what is being measures & potentially change their behaviour.

20
Q

give 2 ethical issues (positives??):

A

Participants were kept anonymous & their results on the number of trigrams they could remember after completing an interference task were kept confidential once they were given to be used as research (A02). Participants are more likely to take part in research if they are kept anonymous (A01).

Participants were given the right to withdraw during the duration of the study, after they completed the study & left the experiment all of their results (The number of trigrams they could recall) were kept anonymous with no names being used within the study (A02). This means that participants can be satisfied that they cannot be identified within the results (A01).

21
Q

what were the results of the practical: remember the examiner doesn’t know our results so we can guess!!!

A

no. trigrams decreased

mean: 2.06, 1.59
median: 2,1
mode: 5,1
range: 4,4

standard deviation: 1.30, 1.17

willcoxon t value - 69

The results of our practical were not significant for a 1 tailed test at p<0.05 where n=13 because the calculated t value of 69 was more than the critical value of 19, therefore we accept the null hypothesis.