Close Relationships - Getting Closer Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Do people’s dating preferences predict who they want to date?:

A
  • Before speed dating event, participants rated the importance of a series of characteristics in a potential partner:
    • Physical attractiveness
    • Earning potential
    • Friendliness
    • Aspects of their personality
      · At the end of each speed date, they rated the person on each of these characteristics - 0-100 scale
      · They then tick whether or not they wanted to see them again
      · Did preferences predict mate selection?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Do people’s dating preferences predict who they want to date? 2:

A

· No
· There was no relationship between what people said they wanted before the event and who they wanted to date after the event
· Picking partners might be different than picking other things.
· Random dating and mixing up the gene pool is really good evolved mechanism
- Research with twins - identical twins their tastes are different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Do people’s dating preferences predict who they want to date? 3:

A

· Similar studies since then -> similar findings (e.g., Joel et al, 2017 - used machine learning)
· Predicting romantic attraction more “random: than we may believe
- May feel as though destined to be together (they’re all they ever wanted) but this seems the result rather than the cause of liking someone
- Predetermined lists of preferences discount the “dyadic” processes - they cant capture the dyadic interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Non-verbal signals of romantic interest:

A

· Smiling, increased eye contact
- Pupil dilation (Pronk et al, 2021)
· Synchronised gestures and mimicking (Karremans and Verwikmeren, 2008)
· Touch on face, neck, torso (vulnerable body parts)
· Less distance, oriented toward each other
· Speech (e.g., matching volume and speed, vocal warmth, relaxed speech, laughter)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Increased use of online dating:

A

· In 2022, dating online particularly common among:
- Younger adults (18-29) - 53%
- Non-heterosexual (e.g., gay, lesbian, bisexual) - 51%
· In 2022, 10 million people active in online dating in the UK
· In the US in 2022, 30% said that they did use online dating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Can online dating help find a better match?:

A

· More appealing as taking out the randomness by using the filters
· Some online dating sites market themselves as having “matching algorithms” that help find a compatible partner, but:
- Don’t reveal their “algorithms”
- Reviewed studies suggest that matching based on self-reported preferences may not work - doesn’t always predict what you are attracted to
· Experts (e.g., Joel et al, 2017) suggest:
- Meet others to find out
- Be the partner you want to be e.g., responsive - focus less on what you want in a partner, and more on being like the person you want to be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why can online dating be disappointing?:

A

· May not feel as attracted to others when finding out who they “really” are, as opposed to who we thought they are (Ramirez et al, 2015)
· Open to disapointment - as they image is different to the reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Interdependence theory

A

· Social exchange theory applied to intimate relationships (Thibaut and Kelley, 1959)
- Rewards and costs determine satisfaction and commitment (i.e., whether to stay or leave)
- Emphasis on rewards and costs
· Rewards = desirable relationship experiences - good outcomes
· Costs = undesirable relationship experiences - bad outcomes e.g., arguments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rewards and costs

A

· Can be tangible/material e.g., making dinner, financial assistance
· Or intangible/social e.g., feeling loved, knowing your partner is dependable, jealousy
· Costs are particularly influential: - applicable to life not just romantic relationships
- Pay more attention to costs, remember costs more than rewards (Baumeister et al, 2001) - pay more attention to the negative
- Roughly 5x greater influence
- “Magic” 5 to 1 ratio (Gottman and Levenson, 1992) - rewards to costs ratio or better
- Predicts relationship satisfaction
· Outcome = rewards - costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Think of a current or past relationship

A
  1. I want our relationship to last for a very long time.
    1. I feel very attached to our relationship – very strongly linked to my partner.
    2. I would not feel very upset if our relationship were to end in the near future.
    3. It is likely that I will date someone other than my partner within the next year.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

investment model - commitment

A
  • Satisfaction - how happy are you in this relationship?
    • Alternatives - how happy would you be in another relationship? Or alone?
    • Investment - what have you put into this relationship that you would lose if the relationship were to end?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

investment model

A
  • Satisfaction, investments, and alternatives impacts commitment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Investment - pros and cons

A
  • High investments may enable couples to weather the inevitable stormy times
    • But, they can also trap people in unhealthy relationships
    • Women with high investments and poor alternatives more likely to return to abusive partners
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why is commitment important?

A

· Commitment helps to protect and maintain relationships - appear to be keen on marriage:
- Derogate alternatives - e.g., committed individuals rate attractive people as less sexy than single individuals (Lyndon and Karremans, 2015)
- Accommodate - respond more constructively when dissatisfied e.g., bite their tongue during a fight, try to work things out (Rusbult et al, 1991)
- Make sacrifices when conflicts of interest arise (Righetti and Impett, 2017)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is attachment?

A

· Attachment - An intimate emotional bond to a particular individual who is seen as providing protection, comfort, and support (e.g., Bowlby, 1969)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Attachment theory (John Bowlby)

A

· Began by observing infant/caregiver relationships
· Attachment system - form bonds with others, become distressed if they are unavailable
· Evolutionary function of the attachment system - keep caregivers close to infants

17
Q

Normative attachment processes

A

· Proximity maintenance - staying near and resisting separations
· Safe haven - turning to for comfort, support, and reassurance
· Secure base - using as a base from which to engage in non-attachment behaviour

18
Q

Individual differences in attachment

A

· Learn in early childhood what to expect from others
· Develop beliefs and expectations about
- Others - whether they will responsive to our needs
- Self - whether we are worthy of love
· These beliefs influence our thoughts, feelings and behaviour in relationships

19
Q

Secure attachment - low anxiety and low avoidance:

A

· Learned that proximity seeking leads to support, protection, and relief of distress
· Turn to others when distressed
· Believe distress is manageable
· More stable and satisfying relationships

20
Q

Dismissive-avoidant attachment - low anxiety and high avoidance:

A

· Value self-reliance and independence
· Avoid seeking support when distressed
· Expect relationship failure, averse to commitment
· Relationships lack intimacy, keep partners at a distance
· Feel higher levels of attraction when interacting with potential romantic alternatives
· Report feeling a sense of relief after break-ups

21
Q

Anxious-preoccupied attachment - high anxiety and low avoidance:

A

· hypervigilant about loss and rejection
· When they become distressed, they have excessive reliance on others.
· They demand closeness, attention and approval
· And are intrusive, demanding, and overly disclosing
· Hard time getting over break-ups

22
Q

Fearful-avoidant attachment - high anxiety and high avoidance:

A

· The High anxiety part means that they are hypersensitive to potential hurt and rejection
· The High avoidance part means that they withdraw when upset; avoid coping
· Relatively poor personal and social adjustment
· Difficulty expressing feelings

23
Q

Can we change?

A

· Attachment theory was originally developed to explain the emotional bonds that develop between infants and their primary caregivers.
· Bowlby claimed that our attachment style originate early in life and shape our relationships from the “cradle to grave.”
· Indeed, our attachment style is rather stable over time (especially secure attachment), from child to adult, and in romantic bonds.
· But:
- Break up: especially likely to change secure to insecure
- And new (good) relationship: especially likely to change avoidant into secure