Class 2/4 Flashcards
Tasty, bright and noisy water study
Garcua and Kielling (1996)
Group 1: illness. Taste CR (didn’t drink a lot) A/V+ H2O weak CR (drink a lot)
Group 2: shock. Taste weak CR (drink a lot) A/V + H2O strong CR ( didn’t drink much)
Neiphobia
Fear of new things, new foods.
CS doesn’t have to produce illness.
Smell can be CS
Logic of scapegoat flavor manipulation
Familiar food v.s. Unfermiliar food + toxin
Augmentation
Phase1: (experimental group) sac+ toxin= get sick, not want sac
Phase 2: (experimental and control group) odor+ sac+ toxin test (odor)
Experimental: super string odor aversio
Condition: moderate aversion
Learning box for cats
Thordike
Discriminative stimulus
Any cue that signals what might happen if they make a response.
Instrental response
Behavior that is reinforced, willing to do
Reinforser
Apetitive orgmentation will work to earn
Aversive renforser
Things organisms will try not to do
Positive reinforcer
Positive, appetitive ex. Grades
Positive punishment
Positive, aversive
If you make response we are going to give you something you wont want
Negative reinforcement
Make response to make bad things go away.
Negitive, aversive
Negitive punishment
Negative, appetitive
Omittion training
Decreasing behavior increases chance of getting something good. ( ex. Stop smoking, go on a date)
Frequency
The number of complete wavelengths that pads a point at a given time. ( for example, per second)