Civil Liberties Free Response Flashcards

1
Q

Selective incorporation

A

Applying bill of rights to states on a case by case basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Background of Gideon vs wainwright

A

A person was charged with breaking into a pool hall. He asked that the court appoint him a lawyer and he was denied. He represented himself which lead to conviction and getting sent to prison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Questions Supreme Court had for Gideon vs wainwright

A

Do states have to appoint someone a lawyer in criminal cases if they cannot afford one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ruling and rationale of Gideon vs wainwright

A

Under due process clause of 14th amendment all states must appoint someone a lawyer if they cannot afford on under the 6th amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Background for McDonald vs Chicago

A

Citizens in a state challenge gun bans in that state after the Supreme Court ruled that citizens in DC could have functional guns in their home

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Questions from the Supreme Court for McDonald vs Chicago

A

Can states ban functional guns in a home under the second and 14th amendments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ruling and rationale for McDonald vs Chicago

A

Under the due process clause of the 14th amendment, citizens have the right to have functional guns in their home under the Second Amendment making these bans unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Background information for schenk vs US

A

During ww1 a person was passing out pamphlets, encouraging young men to disobey the draft, and was arrested and convicted for doing so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Questions the Supreme Court had for schenck vs US

A

Did the arrest and conviction violated his rights to the first amendment, freedom of speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ruling in rational of Schenck versus United States

A

Supreme court ruled against him, because the first amendment does not protect speech that creates clear and present danger that Congress has power to prevent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Background information for New York times vs US

A

The government tried to stop newspapers from publishing stolen, classified documents, arguing it was necessary to protect national security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Background information for you New York times versus US

A

The government trying to read newspapers from publishing, stolen classified documents, arguing it was necessary to protect national security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Questions Supreme Court had for New York Times versus US

A

Is preventing the newspapers from publishing the information, a violation of freedom of the press in first amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ruling in rational for New York Times versus United States

A

The newspapers can publish the materials under freedom of the press in first amendment, because government cannot prove an actual threat to national security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Background information for tinker versus Des Moines

A

High school students were suspended for refusing to remove arm band to protest the Vietnam war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Question supreme court had to decide for tinker versus des Moines

A

Is forcing students to remove armband, a violation of freedom of speech of the first amendment

17
Q

Ruling in rationale of tinker versus des Moines

A

Under freedom of speech in first amendment, students have the right to wear arm bands at school and Schools can only stop free speech from students when it disrupts operation in Schools

18
Q

Background information of citizens united versus FEC

A

No interest group was blocked from an Anti-Hillary Clinton movie during her campaign for president

19
Q

Questions Supreme Court had for citizens united versus FEC

A

Weather, corporations and unions can use their general fund to express their political views under freedom of speech in first amendment

20
Q

Ruling in rationale for citizens, united versus FEC

A

Corporations are people therefore, they have free-speech under first amendment and independent funds are protected to express political views

21
Q

Background information of Engel versus Vitale

A

A public school had a prayer said over intercom for all to hear each day

22
Q

Questions the Supreme Court had for Engel versus Vitale

A

Is having a prayer over intercom violation clause of the first amendment

23
Q

Ruling and rationale for Engel versus Vitale

A

Reading prayer over intercom violates establishment clause of freedom of religion in first amendment, because government can’t favor any religion and all students would hear prayer

24
Q

Background information of Wisconsin versus Yoder

A

Several Amish parents were arrested for refusing to send their kids to high school because it violated their religious beliefs

25
Q

Question Supreme Court had to decide for Wisconsin versus Yoder

A

Under free exercise clause of the first amendment, can parents choose not to send their kids to school for religious reasons

26
Q

Ruling and rationale of Wisconsin versus Yoder

A

Under free exercise clause of first amendment freedom of religion, parents could not choose to not send their children to high school if it went against religious beliefs