CHP. 11 - Confounding vs. Obscuring Variables Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Confounding Variables

A

Variables that cause a false positive result
- threat to internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Maturation Threat

A

Effect due to spontaneous changes in behavior
- due to passage of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

History Threat

A

Effect due to external events that impacts most members of a treatment group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Regression Threat

A

Threat due to “regression to the mean”
- aka regression to the average

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Attrition Threat

A

May occur if there is a reduction in participants from pre- to post-test
- more of a problem if “only high” or “only low” scores drop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Testing Threat

A

Practice or fatigue effect
- Solution: use a post-test only design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Instrumentation Threat

A
  • Instrument Decay, Observer Fatigue, 2 versions of a test aren’t sufficiently equivalent
  • Solution: use a post-test only design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Testing vs. Instrumentation Threat

A
  • Testing means that the participants change over time after being tested before
  • Instrumentation means that the measuring instrument has changed over time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Selection-History Threat

A

Outside event affects people in a study but only 1 level of IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Selection-Attrition Threat

A

Only 1 experimental group experiences attrition while the other doesn’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Double Blind Study

A

Neither the participants nor the researchers know who is in the treatment group vs. comparison group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Single Blind Study

A

Participants know which group they are in but the observers don’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Placebo Effect

A

Inert treatments can result in real improvements in symptoms b/c people believe that they’re receiving a valid treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Solutions for Confounding Variables

A
  • Include comparison groups
  • Use random assignment whenever possible
  • Use double blind whenever possible
  • Use reliable coding procedures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Obscuring Variables

A

Variables that can cause null results (miss)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Null Effects

A
  • Weak Manipulations
  • Insensitive Measures
  • Design Confounds Acting in Reverse
17
Q

Weak Manipulations

A

How did researchers operationalize the IV?
- was it enough to produce a difference between groups?

18
Q

Insensitive Measures

A

Operationalization of the DV isn’t sensitive enough

19
Q

Ceiling Effect

A

All scores cluster at high end of values

20
Q

Floor Effect

A

All scores cluster at low end of values

21
Q

Use of manipulation checks

A

Can help detect weak manipulations & ceiling/floor effects

22
Q

Design Confounds Acting in Reverse

A

Design confound counteracts true effect of IV leading to null result

23
Q

Situation Noise

A

Any sort of external distractions
- more = less likely for significant results

24
Q

Measurement Error

A

Any factor that can inflate/deflate a subject’s score on a dependent measure

25
Q

Individual Differences

A

Uncontrollable differences in subjects

26
Q

Power

A

Likelihood a study will return a significant result