Child Psychology Non-priority Flashcards

Previous years- 80%

1
Q

Intelligence

Theorist - Spearman (1904)

A

‘g’ factor responsible for performance on mental ability tests. People who did well in one area did well in others. Underlying general intelligence influences all task performances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intelligence

Theorist-Gardner (1983)

A

Multiple intelligences= 8 kinds: visual-spatial, musical, linguistic-verbal, interpersonal, interpersonal, logical-mathematical, bodily-kinaesthetic, naturalistic. Could be strong in one or have a range of abilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Intelligence

Theorist-Goleman (1996)

A

5 essential elements: emotional self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, social skills. Aim to have all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Intelligence
Concordance rate
MZ
DZ

A

Concordance rate: likelihood of both twins in a family sharing the same characteristic.
MZ:one egg/identical
DZ:two eggs/ non-identical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Intelligence

Haier et all (2005)- brain sizes

A
  • men have more grey matter in their frontal and piratical lobes= decision making and spatial awareness
  • women have more grey matter in frontal lobes and Broca’s area= decision making and attention and speech production
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intelligence

Genotype+Stimulation=IQ

A

An individual can inherit the eugenic potential to be intelligent but good nurturing will effectively with that genotype for that potential to be achieved.

High IQ+ good stimulation = high IQ
High IQ+ poor stimulation =average IQ
Low IQ+ good stimulation = average IQ
Low IQ + poor stimulation = low IQ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Intelligence
Van-Leeuwen (2008)
Aim

A

Correlation of the relationship between the IQ of twins, their siblings and parents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Intelligence
Van-Leeuwen (2008)
Sample

A
112 families from the Netherlands on the twin registry and also had another sibling. 
48MZ 64DZ
twins were aged: 8.9-9.5 yrs
additional child: 9.9-14.9 yrs
Opportunity/self-selected 
All signed consent forms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Intelligence
Van-Leeuwen (2008)
General procedure

A
  • Biological data, hormonal and MRI collected

- Arrived between 9-11, had 3 breaks and lasted 5 hours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Intelligence
Van-Leeuwen (2008)

Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices

A
  • the standard version was taken by children
  • the advanced progressive matrices was taken by the adults

The score indicated general intelligence. The Rasch model was used to calculate the probability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Intelligence
Van-Leeuwen (2008)

Results (x4)
+heritability

A
  • correlations higher for MZ twins that first degree relatives
  • high correlation between parents’ IQ
  • no sex difference
  • lower IQ groups=high interaction between the genotype and environment

Heritability was estimated at 67%, the rest environmental.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Intelligence
Van-Leeuwen (2008)

Conclusions (x3)

A
  • influence of parents on children’s intelligence primarily due to eugenic factors
  • environment has more of an impact on lower IQ children than higher (predisposed)
  • Children with a predisposed IQ will seek out stimulating or non-stimulating environments depending on the IQ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intelligence

Intelligence tests-Yerkes
How does it work?
Examples of questions
Strengths
Weaknesses
A

Alpha-literate. Multiple choice questions based on American Culture. (What is silk made from?)
Beta-illiterate. Draw missing parts of images, mazes, symbols. (Draw a bowling ball in the hand of a person in a picture)

+objective-can be either right or wrong
+ordinal data
-ethnocentric situations of American culture
-logistical issues- haven’t picked up pen before

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Intelligence

Intelligence tests-gardner's multiple intelligence
How does it work?
Examples of questions
Strengths
Weaknesses
A

Self-report using a rating scale based on statements(either 1-4 or 1-5 scale.)
‘I consider myself as athletic’
‘Music is very important to me and my daily life’

+nominal and ordinal data
+objective in allocation to intelligence type
-not reliable as self-report
-leading/ social desirability as everyone wants to be perceived a certain way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cognitive development in education

Piaget-Schema

A

A set of linked ‘existing understandings’ of the world. Thought or behaviour that organises categories of info and relationships ships among them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cognitive development in education

Piaget-Assimilation

A

Using schemas to deal with new objects/ situations.

17
Q

Cognitive development in education

Piaget-Accommodation

A

Adding or changing schema to make sense of a new experience.

18
Q

Cognitive development in education

Piaget-Maturation Theory-Sensorimotor stage

A

0-18 months

  • matching actions to sensations
  • objects continue to exist even when they are not seen
19
Q

Cognitive development in education

Piaget-Maturation Theory-Pre-operational stage

A

18 months to 7 years

  • mental images, symbols and language
  • generalise rules about mental operations
20
Q

Cognitive development in education

Piaget-Maturation Theory-Concrete operational stage

A

7-11 years

  • complex operations such as ordering
  • others’ point of view
  • the world is how it is, not what it could be
21
Q

Cognitive development in education

Piaget-Maturation Theory-Fornal operational stage

A

11+ years

  • reason logically
  • deal with abstract concepts
  • mentally deal with several factors at once
22
Q

Cognitive development in education

Lev Vygotsky- social construction

A

The Zone of Proximal Development

Things they can do>ZPD things they can dow with help (the bigger it is, the easier it is to learn)>things they can’t do.

23
Q

Cognitive development in education
Wood et al (1976)
Tutoring definition/Aim

A

Describe the nature of instruction of skill and acquisition and problem solving and how this changed with age.

24
Q

Cognitive development in education
Wood et al (1976)
Sample

A

30 children-3,4,5 years old
Equally boys and girls
Parents replied to volunteer
Cambridge, MS

25
Q

Cognitive development in education
Wood et al (1976)
The Puzzle

A

21 blocks which formed a 6 level pyramid.
Fitted together by pegs and holes. Each level has a depletion on the base-orientation must be correct.
4 blocks for each layer apart from the top.
Left to play with for the first 5 minutes.

26
Q

Cognitive development in education
Wood et al (1976)
The Procedure -Tutoring

A

Controlled Observation
-instructed verbal and only interviewed if failed to follow instruction
-tutor would connect a pair of the smallest blocks:
If child did own=do more
If child ignored=present again
If child assembled but overlooked the feature=verbally draw attention and compare.
-left child unless they stopped or got into difficulty

27
Q

Cognitive development in education
Wood et al (1976)
Scoring

A

Assisted or unassisted?
Mismatch= reject? lay down?
Disassemble= reassemble? or not?

28
Q
Cognitive development in education
Wood et al (1976)
Results 
Most direct interventions
Most verbal interventions
Most likely to accept tutor's suggestions
75% of correct pair construction
10% of correct pair construction
A

Most direct interventions: 3 y/o

Most verbal interventions: 4 y/o

Most likely to accept tutor’s suggestions: 5 y/o

75% of correct pair construction:5 y/o
10% of correct pair construction: 3 y/o

29
Q

Cognitive development in education
Wood et al (1976)

Conclusions

A

The greater the age, the less juror interventions required.

Cognitive abilities progress manually with age but help is more openly accepted as it becomes learnt that it is beneficial.

30
Q

Cognitive development in education
Wood et al’s Key Components of Scaffolding:
Recruitment

A

Enlist problem solver’s interest and adherence to the task’s requirements,

31
Q

Cognitive development in education
Wood et al’s Key Components of Scaffolding:
Reduction in degrees of freedom

A

Simplifying task by reducing the acts required to reach the solution.

32
Q

Cognitive development in education
Wood et al’s Key Components of Scaffolding:
Direct maintenance

A

Lag and regress to other aims-tutor keeps focus on objective.

33
Q

Cognitive development in education
Wood et al’s Key Components of Scaffolding:
Marking critical features

A

Accentuate relevant features of the task.

34
Q

Cognitive development in education
Wood et al’s Key Components of Scaffolding:
Frustration control

A

Less dangerous or stressful with tutor that without.

35
Q

Cognitive development in education
Wood et al’s Key Components of Scaffolding:
Demonstration

A

Idealisation of act to be performed.