Chapter one Flashcards
early philosophers on economic inequality
- jean-jacque rousseau
- adam smith
- karl marx
- max weber
- joseph schumpeter
jean-jacque rousseau
- discourse on the origin of inequality
- 2 types of inequality:
1. natural
2. moral
natural inequality
e.g. owing to health status, age, physical strength
moral inequality
e.g. owing to private property- those with property develop laws to protect their interests
adam smith
- inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations
- inequality innate part of capitalism, therefore we must accept it
- people act only in their own economic self-interest
- economies operate best without government interference
- the market is [naturally; by an ‘invisible hand’] self-regulating and efficient
karl marx
- capitalism creates inequality through private property, and the exploitation and surplus extraction of labour
- capitalism must be overthrown; communism only answer to inequality
- factories were very efficient and very profitable
- capitalism encouraged competition; but competition drove down wages/working conditions
- private property encouraged worker exploitation
- called for an end to capitalism
max weber
communism would only transfer the power from the capitalist class to the government elites
jospeh schumpeter
- inequality result of the huge rewards provided to those who innovate and prospectively invest in innovation
- governments working in the interest of working class would spell the end to capitalism…because it kills the motive of innovation
antonio garmsci - prison notebooks
- capitalism reached a hegemonic position in society through contamination within other institutions
- hegemony: dominant group wins the voluntary consent of popular masses
- unlike domination, which uses state force, hegemony works through families, schools and the media
ralf dahrendorf
- many more people today have a stake in the capitalist system
- overall increase in the standard of living
- organized labour and union successes
- greater legal protections
factors of economic inequality in canada
- globalization
- technology
- tax policy
- executive/ceo pay
- union decline/resistance
early social responses to poverty in canada
- poor laws: roughly 1500-1900
- relegated church’s responsibility for addressing poverty
- “poverty not fault of individual” ideology
- revised poor laws (1800-1835) made poverty the fault of the individual
early institutional care for the poor
- poor houses
- workhouse
- prisons
- charitable organizations
poor houses
- deserved poor; the ones that were poor and its not their own fault
- established to house the destitute
- e.g. elderly who can’t work
workhouse
- undeserved poor; those deemed at fault for being poor
- if you are able-bodied you are expected to work to earn things like a place to stay and something to eat
- e.g. mentally ill (could be in either house;depends), unwed pregnant women, widowed women, criminals
prisons
many of the people in the prisons were elderly men and some were young pregnant women with nowhere else to go
charitable organizations
- mostly middle/upper class women ran charitable agencies
- by 1867, these volunteer organizations were soon overwhelmed because of:
1. increased urban population
2. mass unemployment
state intervention to class inequality
- poor laws gave way to more stable/legislative intervention
- social policies reflected ideology
- policies today aim to address shortcomings of capitalism
structural problems of poverty
- deindustrialization: manufacturing change
- costs of living: inflation
- barriers to opportunities: time, money, location, education, work, family
- limited access to affordable housing: current housing crisis
- inability to obtain credit: credit as an obstacle to opportunities
poor policy
- low welfare rates
- low minimum wage
- absence of living wage policies
- poor wealth distribution
- neoliberalism
living wage policies
- a voluntary commitment of employers to go beyond the minimum standard and pay enough for employees to cover their expenses and participate in community
- enough to provide a decent standard of living
- e.g. sharon has a family of 4, and they would determine how much money a family of 4 needs to live decently
neoliberalism - poor policy
- helped the rich become more rich/stay rich
- linked to poorer collective health and well-being