chapter eleven Flashcards
capitalism and democracy
- democracy and capitalism are antagonistic
- capitalism is individualistic, profit-oriented, competitive and unequal
- democracy is focused on the common good, a collective orientation, equality and the common good
- tensions between the 2 started during Keynesianism, a time of capitalism but also common good
- there is a correlation between inequality and neoliberalism; since pulling back from Keynesianism and the welfare state model and embraced neoliberalism and policies that align with it there has been growing inequality
common characteristics of democracy
- elections
- political participation
- civil rights
- separation of powers
- sufficient power extended to the elected representatives
elections as a characters of democracy
- open elections to all citizens; elections free of corruption
- ability to vote for the person representing them
political participation as a characters of democracy
- must be adequate representation/political voice and diverse representation
- any Canadian citizen can run for office
civil rights as a characters of democracy
individual rights and protection of those rights
separation of powers as a characters of democracy
- between those elected and those who implement/enforce those laws
- elected officials must have sufficient power but they can’t intervene or have power in running an institution; they set the laws and institutions carry them out
sufficient power extended to elected representatives as a characters of democracy
- only those elected have right to set laws and have power to do so
- no one else can have the power to do the same thing
who are citizens
- members of nations or societies; legally-recognized inhabitants of a nation, province, city etc (eg citizen of Canada; Alberta)
- legally entitled to benefits and have certain responsibilities of being member of particular society
second-class citizens
- those who have some/not all rights of full citizens
- e.g. temporary foreign workers have a right to medicare, protection of property but not the right to vote
non-citizens
- denied almost all benefits of citizens
- e.g. people who may be in Canada illegally
T.H Marshall and citizenship
- Marshall suggested that originally 3 elements were delivered by one central institution, but that today they have diffused into separate institutions
- citizenship has 3 elements:
- civil citizenship
- political citizenship
- social citizenship
civil citizenship - T.H. Marshall (18th century)
- rights to individual freedoms & justice
- rights necessary for individual freedom; freedom of speech, right to protection of property etc
- primary institute: Courts of Justice (because these rights can be violated)
political citizenship - T.H. Marshall (19th century)
- right to participate in exercise of political power (vote/run for office)
- primary institute: Parliament/Municipal government
social citizenship - T.H. Marshall (20th century)
- rights to full social inclusion in a society’s wealth; right to economic well-being and share in the wealth of society
- right to educational and health services and to participation in the cultural heritage
- primary institute: Educational and Social Service Systems
social citizenship programs
- employment insurance
- medicare/Healthcare
- parental benefits/maternity leave
- education
- social welfare
- social Services
- pensions
social citizenship and inequality
- social citizenship programs maintain/reproduce existing inequalities; the privileged most benefit
- most sociologists will maintain a critical view because it is based on the principle that everyone is society should benefit from societies wealth and the best democracy is one where everyone is included
- sociologists acknowledge that a number of programs aimed at inclusion and ensuring people have the bare minimum have fallen short
- programs and policies have developed has actually resulted in a continued or enhanced privileging of the already privileged
T.H. Marshall citizenship and capitalism
- citizenship developed in capitalism
- capitalism would have benefited from civil citizenship because individual rights and freedoms align with both
- tensions between social citizenship & capitalism existed because on the surface would appear as a threat to capitalism and what capitalism stood for
- because capitalism and citizenship co-exist, inequalities are permitted
individuals high risk for poverty
- approximately 9% of persons living in families and 27% of unattached individuals are living in poverty in Canada today:
- women
- Indigenous peoples
- persons with disabilities
- recent Immigrants
- members of visible minority groups
women in poverty
- mothers allowance/parental benefits program
- ‘man about the house’/’spouse about the house’
- prostitution and abortion laws
- daycare policy
- CPP
- employment insurance
- wage discrepancies
mothers allowance - parental benefits program
- reserved for widows whose husbands passed during the war, when it was originally introduced
- thought be deserving because of their husbands duty in the army
‘man about the house’/’spouse about the house’
- heavy monitoring of women on welfare to see if any man entered the home; because if he enters the home he therefore is a financial contributor and she isn’t deserved welfare
- based on the assumption men are always providing
daycare policy
- government is lagging on daycare policy
- accessible and affordable daycare programs would contribute to the reduction of child poverty
CPP for women in poverty
focused only productive labour only so you can’t get it if you haven’t contributed through work to CPP meaning full-time moms would no qualify
indigenous peoples in poverty
- the indian Act denied citizenship and disallowed their ability to vote and stripped women of their indian status if their married a non-indigenous man
- reserve land provided on the basis of Indian Status
- Canada Pension Plan didn’t include indigenous Canadians till 1988
- education systems on reserves are grossly underfunded
- systemic racism: maintained in poverty because they are over incarcerated and over-policed
persons with disabilities in poverty
- social mobility infrastructure: e.g. accessible sidewalks, ramps for buildings and transport
- tracking/Streamed programs: e.g. education programs for children with learning disabilities
- human rights legislation: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
recent immigrants and members of visible minority groups in poverty
- Chinese workers: used for cheap labour to build the railroad and then a head tax policy was applied to repent them from staying and brining their families over
- point system
- undervaluation of education: people with high education credentials coming into Canada unable to provide the same for their families here
- immigrant women: come in with Live-in Caregiver Program and are often denied equal citizenship or prevented from getting other jobs
- temporary foreign workers: heavily exploited in the marketplace because they don’t have access to the same rights
- systematic racism and discrimination: e.g. police-profiling of racialized Canadians can lead to increased charges, or fines
the state influences processes of production ,reproduction and distribution
- may introduce policies/programs that increase equality, or may introduce policies/programs that reproduce or increase inequalities
- e.g influences production by offering tax incentives for businesses
- e.g. influences reproduction processes by offering parental leave for moms and dads
- e.g. influences distribution by providing CPP and determining who gets it, how much people get, who qualifies for EI, etc
the state and inequality
- the state regulates and reproduces relations of class, gender, race, ethnicity and age through policies adapted, especially regulate through policies considering citizenship and the parts of citizenship aimed at inclusion
- much easier to govern a population that is content or are not desperate
- social citizenship = easier governance
- social inequalities have increased as the state has adopted neoliberalism
- policies and programs developed since the 1980s have failed miserably in the area of social citizenship