Chapter 7 - Test 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Source of threats to Internal Validity

A
  1. People are different (group)
  2. People change (time)
  3. Process of studying people changes people (participant reactivity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Artifacts

A
  • threaten external validity
  • held constant across the levels of the independent variable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Confounds

A

*threatens internal validity
* different for the different levels of the independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Threats to Internal Validity

A

*Time Threats
* Group Threats
*Reactivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Time threats

A
  • History (external)
  • Maturation (internal)
  • Testing (repeatability)
  • Instrumentation (different instruments to measure same confounds)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Group threats

A
  • Selection
  • Selection by maturation
  • Selection by ???
  • Mortality/Attrition
  • Regression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Reactivity

A
  • Diffusion/Contamination
  • Demand Characteristics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

History Threat

A

Changes due to environmental events other than the treatment
(outside the person)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Instrumentation Threat

A

Measuring instrument changes during the course of the study and these changes cause participants’ score to change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Selection

A

Groups were different to start with (before experiment is run)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Selection by maturation

A

Groups that are similar (but not identical) to start with may naturally grow apart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Diffusion/Contamination

A

Participants may change through observation, or communication with other participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

GAGEs (CONFOUNDS)

A

Geography
Age
Gender
Ethnicity
Social economic status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

OOPS! (ARTIFACTS)

A

Operationalization
Occasions
Populations
Situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Other Threats

A
  • Demand characteristics (Hawthorne Effect)
    *Participant expectancies
    *Participant reactance
    *Evaluation apprehension
    *Response sets:
    *acquiescence (agree with everything)
    *nay-saying (disagree with everything)
    *middle of the road (select neutral options)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Pygmalion Effect

A

Example: Teachers spend more time with students that are expected to get good grades. In the end, the good grades are due to the teacher spending more time with these students because of the higher expectations.

17
Q

John Henry Effect

A

The Control group knows that they are and tries harder than the non-control group

18
Q

Placebo

A

Telling participant they have received treatment when in actuality that have not

19
Q

Nocebo

A

Blindly providing treatment, yet the patient does not know that they have received the treatment

20
Q

single-blind

A

either the participant or the experimenter does not know

21
Q

double-blind

A

both the experimenter and the participant do not know

22
Q

Selection by _____________

A

Selection can also interact with other threats, such as X History interaction

23
Q

Mortality/Attrition

A

Drop out of study like longitudinal overtime studies
* Homogeneous - just as likely to drop from a control group than an experimental group
* Heterogeneous - people are dropping from one group more than the other.
Overall scores change because of people dropping out of the study

24
Q

Regression (to the mean)

A

Participants who get extreme scores have less extreme scores when retested because extreme scores are extreme, in part, due to random error; since the random error is inconsistent, chances are that random error will not make participants score quite so extreme the second time around.
SPORTS PERFORMANCE

25
Q

Hawthorne Effect

A

People react to being studied, and productivity would naturally increases when an employer does anything with the employees (like bringing donuts for the day)