Chapter 10 - Final Flashcards
Exploratory studies
- “What”
- Can be qualitative or quantitative
Example: What is the relationship between affect (mood) and neurotransmitters?
Descriptive Studies
- “How”
- Generally Qualitative
Example: How do individuals deal with depression deal with their disorder?
Explanatory Studies
- “Why”
- Can be qualitative or quantitative
Example: Why do SSRIs alleviate depression?
Cross-sectional Studies
Data is only collected once
Longitudinal Studies
- Data is collected at different points in time
- Panel studies (panel = same participants)
- Trend studies (different participants of the same population)
- Cohort Studies (usually based on the same event)
Idiographic Research
- In-depth as they apply to one person
- Often qualitative using case studies and interviews
Nomothetic Research
- Often quantitative
- Requires establishing 3 criteria:
i. correlation
ii. time order
iii. non-spuriousness - Casualty in research
i. ability to determine causality = Internal Validity
ii. prerequisite for determining causality:
a. Know that behavior changed along with the treatment
[covariation, correlation]
b. Know that treatment came before the behavior change
[Temporal sequence, time order (temporal contiguity, precedence)
c. Know that everything but the treatment stayed the same
[elimination of confounds, control, and non-spuriousness]
Experimental Designs
- Randomized One-Group Posttest-Only Design
- Randomized Posttest-Only Control Group Design
- Non-Random posttest only control group design
- Non-Random pretest posttest control group design
- Non-Random one-group pretest posttest design
- Solomon Four-Group Experimental Design
- Non-Experimental or Pre-Experimental Designs
- Quasi-Experimental Designs
- Non-Random cross-sectional survey design
- Longitudinal Cohort
Anatomy of a design name
- Is there Random Assignment to conditions?
a. Yes = Randomized
b. No = Non-randomized - Is there a pretest? Posttest?
a. Pretest only = pretest-only
b. Posttest only = posttest-only
c. Both = pretest posttest - Is there a control group?
a. Yes = Control Group
b. No = One-group
Non-Experimental Designs
- Quasi-Experiments
- Non-experimental Designs
- Small-N (Single-N) Designs
*Purpose – To minimize threats to Internal Validity in situations where treatments can’t be randomize
Solomon four-group experimental design
- 4 control groups (randomly assigned)
a. 2 pretests (2 groups do it and 2 groups do not) TREATMENT
b. no experiment
c. 4 posttest
Why Quasi?
- lack of control (comparison groups)
- no random assignment
- naturally occurring groups
- ethnical reasons (can’t assign people to get sick)
Comparison across groups
Non-equivalent group designs
Comparison across time
Time series designs
Comparison across groups and time
- Time series with non-equivalent groups designs
- One-Group Posttest-Only Design
- Posttest-Only Design With Nonequivalent Groups
- One-Group Pretest Posttest Design
One Group Posttest-Only Design
- No use in determining an effect
- Similar in some ways to a case study, except in a case study, a lot is known about one subject to help put results in perspective.
Posttest-Only Design With Nonequivalent Groups
- Differences could be due to treatment or selection
- Conclusions can be helped with additional information to gage the equivalency of the two groups.
One-Group Pretest Posttest Design
- Improvement in terms of selection
- No counterbalancing is used to take the two observations close together in a time like a within-subjects design.
Quasi-Experimental Designs
- Nonequivalent Control Group Design With Pretest and Posttest
- Interrupted Time-Series Designs
- Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments
Nonequivalent Control Group Design With Pretest and Posttest
- Most common in Social Science
- If O1 = O1 Groups are relatively equivalent
a. Selection and Regression are minimized - If O1 = O2 for the control group
b. History and Maturation are minimized - Allows for assessment of mortality
- Selection interactions are still a risk, especially if pretest differences exist
Nonequivalent Control Group Design With Pretest and Posttest Variations
- Use of a proxy pretest
a. A measure of variables that correlate with posttest - Separate pretest and posttest samples
b. Used if testing can be a threat - Pretest observations at more than one time intervals
Interrupted Time-Series Designs
- No problems with selection or interactions with selection
- Testing or regression issues should disappear with the multiple pretests
- Maturity may show as a trend
Interrupted Time-Series Design Variations
- Addition of nonequivalent no-treatment control group time series
a. Allows assessment of history as a threat - Interrupted time series with removed
treatment
b. Can be used if treatment effects are
reversible - Can be repeated to produce multiple replications (similar to baseline designs)
- Interrupted time series with switching replications can counter or help assess most threats to internal validity
Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiment Advantages
- Allows us to do research which may not be possible or ethical otherwise
Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiment Disadvantages
- When threats to internal validity are found, it may invalidate your results
- More complex than an experiment