Chapter 7: Postanalysis Flashcards
Indicate problem with the specimens or an issue with the result
Prevent the release of erroneous laboratory
Alarms and Flags
Additional Steps in Flagging Specimens
- by automated instrument itself
- by specialized middleware
- by laboratory information system
Flags for Problem Specimen
- sample contain amounts inadequate for reliable analysis
- presence of high concentration of interfering substances in the specimen
- instrument that can often analyze more than 100 samples per hour
Automated Cell Counters
What type of samples can be reported immediately?
Normal Sample or Samples that show Quantitative Abnormalities
Flagged for preparation of blood smear and further evaluation
Samples that could contain qualitative abnormalities
What happens to an analyte concentration outside the validated linear range?
- increase in signal linearity related to inc. in conc.
- above the linear range, the machine dilutes and renanalyze sample
- below LR, sample is reported as “less than the limit of detection”
The process of conparing a current laboratory result with results obtained on a previous specimen from the same patient
Delta Checks
Types of Errors Detected by Delta Checks
- preanalytic and analytic issues
May not be readily detectable
Must be reported immediately to a healthcare provider
Critical Values
Required rapid communication of laboratory results
Federal Law, Regulatory Agencies, and Joint Commission
Develops a crticial values policy that meets the needs of the patients and staff served by the laboratory
Medical Director of the Laboratory
Definition of Reference Intervals
Laboratory Results vs Reference or Normal Range
- Range of values into which 95% of non-diseased individuals will fall
- *some of these analytes is defined as “greater than” or “less than” a certain value
- some have been defined by prof. org. w/out adherence to the 95% rule
Reference Ranges
Does not require reference intervals except if the patient population was clearly distinct and exhibited range of values
Standardization
The Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Machine establishes process for standardization by:
- Identifying
- Reviewing against agreed criteria
- Publishing list(s) of Higher Order Certified Reference Materials and Reference Measurement Procedures
Calibrating and using materials traceable to isotope dilution mass spectrometry reference measurement procedure
Reduce Interlaboratory Variability
Factors that Influence Reference Ranges
Age Genetic background Exposure to environmental factors Sample collection container Sample transport Time between specimen collection and analysis Sample storage before analysis
Determination of Reference Ranges
- Testing at least 120 SAMPLES from nondiseased individuals in each “partition”
- Transference
- Verication by another lab’s or the manufacturer’s reference interval if the analyte was not previously tested for the lab
Verification of a reference interval that was previously established for a different method
Transference
Result of assay imprecision
Analytic Variability
Due to biologic changes that cause analyte levels to fluctuate over time
Intraindividuality Variability
Occurs becauuse of factors specific to individual patients
Interindividuality Variation