Chapter 5 Flashcards

1
Q

The process of systematically determining the relative worth of jobs to create a job structure for the organization. The evaluation is based on a combination of job content, skills required, and value to the organization

A

job evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Structure that relies on work content—tasks, behaviors, responsibilities

A

job based structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The relative contribution of jobs to organizational goals, to their external market rates, or to some other agreed-upon rates.

A

relative value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The work performed in a job and how it gets done (tasks, behaviors, knowledge required, etc).

A

content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Information that describes a job. May include responsibility assumed and/or the tasks performed.

A

job content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the major decisions in job evaluation?

A

Establish purpose of evaluation
Decide whether to use single or multiple plans
Choose among alternative approaches
Obtain involvement of relevant stakeholders
Evaluate plans usefulness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A structured job analysis technique that classifies job information into seven basic factors: information input, mental
processes, work output, relationships with other persons, job context, other job characteristics, and general dimensions. Analyzes jobs in terms of worker-oriented data.

A

position analysis questionnaire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A prototypical job, or group of jobs, used as a reference point for making pay comparisons within or without the organization.

A

benchmark (key) jobs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Orders the job descriptions from highest to lowest based on a global definition of relative value or contribution to the organization’s success

A

ranking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Job evaluation method that involves slotting job descriptions into a series of classes or grades that cover the range of jobs and that serve as a standard against which the job descriptions are compared

A

classification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Compensable factors, with factor degrees numerically selected, and weights reflecting the relative importance of each factor

A

point method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Setting pay structures almost exclusively through matching pay for a very large percentage of jobs with the rates paid in the external market.

A

market pricing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A job evaluation method that involves ordering the job description alternately at each extreme. All the jobs are considered. Agreement is reached on which is the most valuable and then the least valuable. Evaluators alternate between the next most valued and next least valued and so on until the
jobs have been ordered.

A

alternation ranking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A ranking job evaluation method that involves comparing all possible pairs of jobs under study.

A

paired comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

grouping of jobs that are considered substantially similar for pay purposes.

A

classficiation method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

those characteristics in the work that the organization values, that help it pursue its strategy and achieve its objectives

A

compensable factors

17
Q

Determining the intervals on a measurement instrument.

A

scaling

18
Q

the risk and complexity, the impact of the decisions, and the time that must pass before the impact is evident

A

decision making

19
Q

Measures that indicate the importance of each compensable factor in a job evaluation system. Can be derived through either a committee judgment or a statistical analysis.

A

factor weight

20
Q

An attempt made by organizations to contain benefit costs, such as imposing deductibles and coinsurance on health benefits or replacing defined benefit pension plans with defined contribution plans.

A

cost containment

21
Q

Discrimination usually
defined as including (1) access discrimination,
which occurs when qualified women and minorities
are denied access to particular jobs, promotions,
or training opportunities; and (2) valuation
discrimination, which takes place when minorities
or women are paid less than white males for
performing substantially equal work.

A

pay discrimination

22
Q

A point factor job evaluation system that evolved into the National Position Evaluation Plan sponsored by NMTA associates

A

National Electrical Manufacturers Association plan

23
Q

A point factor job evaluation plan for production, maintenance, and service personnel.

A

National Metal Trades Association

24
Q

available from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), uses as compensable factors knowledge, job controls/complexity, contacts, physical environment, and can be applied to a wide range of jobs

A

National Compensation Survey

25
Q

methodology that considers work to be a process in which knowledge/skill/ability is applied to various issues and challenges in order to create an output that is of value to the organization

A

hay group guide chart - profile method

26
Q

Measures that reflect different degrees
within each compensable factor. Most commonly five
to seven degrees are defined. Each degree may be anchored by typical skills, tasks and behaviors, or key
job titles.

A

factor scales

27
Q

A particular numerical point
difference has the same meaning on all parts of a scale

A

interval scaling

28
Q

A pay structure to be
duplicated with a point plan.

A

criterion pay structure

29
Q

Compensable factor importance weights are inferred using statistical methods such as
regression analysis.

A

policy capturing

30
Q

Compensable
factor importance weights are assigned by a committee based on judgment.

A

committee a priori judgement

31
Q

Mechanisms are created to
handle pay disagreements. They provide a forum for
employees and managers to voice their complaints and
receive a hearing

A

appeals process

32
Q

Group that may be
charged with the responsibility of (1) selecting a job evaluation system, (2) carrying out or at least supervising the process of job evaluation, and (3) evaluating the success with which the job
evaluation has been conducted.

A

job evaluation committee

33
Q

A grouping of jobs based on their job-related similarities and differences and on their value to the organization’s objectives

A

hierarchy

34
Q

How do you compute compensable factor points?

A

weight x degree rating