Chapter 4 Validity in Psychological Research Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Error Variance

A

Variance among scores caused by the operation of randomly acting variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Random Error

A

Any error possible in measuring a variable, excluding error that is systematic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Validity

A

The extent to which an effect demonstrated in research is genuine, not produced by spurious variables and not limited to a specific context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Threat to Validity

A

Any aspect of the design or method of a study the that weakens the likelihood that a real effect has been demonstrated or that might obscure the existence of a real effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Internal Validity

A

Extent to which an effect found in a study can be taken to be genuinely caused by manipulation of the independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Construct Validity

A

Extent to which conceptions and operational measures of variables encompass the intended theoretical constructs. The constructs can be of persons (samples), treatments (IVs), observations (DV measures) and settings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Participant Expectancy

A

Effect of participants’ expectancy about what they think is supposed to happen in a study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hawthorne Effect

A

Effect on human performance caused solely by the knowledge that one is being observe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Demand Characteristics

A

Cues in a study which help the participant to work out what is expected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Pleasing the Experimenter

A

Tendency of participants to act in accordance with they they think the experimenter would like to happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Enlightenment

A

Tendency for people to be familiar with psychological research findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Social Desirability

A

Tendency of research participants to want to ‘look good’ and provide socially acceptable answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluation Apprehension

A

Participants’ concern about being tested, which may affect results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reactive Study/Design

A

Study in which participants react is some way to the experience of being studied/tested

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Standardised Procedure

A

Tightly controlled steps taken by experimenter with each participant and used to avoid experimenter bias or expectancy effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Single Blind

A

Procedure in an experiment where either participants or data assessors do not know which treatment each participant received

17
Q

Double Blind

A

Experimental procedure where neither participants not data gatherers/assessors know which treatment participants have received

18
Q

External Validity

A

Extent to which results of research can be generalised across people, places and times

19
Q

Population Validity

A

Extent to which research effect can be generalised across people

20
Q

Ecological Validity

A

Widely overused term which can generally be replaces with ‘representative design’. Also used to refer to the extent to which a research effect generalises across situations. The original meaning comes from cognitive psychology and refers to the degree to which a proximal stimulus predicts the distal stimulus for the observer. Should not be automatically applied to the laboratory/field distinction.

21
Q

Representative Design

A

Extent to which conditions of an experiment represent those outside the laboratory to which the experimental effect is to be generalised

22
Q

Reproducibility Project

A

Large study designed to assess the extent to which the findings of 100 psychological studies could be repeated in replications. Surprisingly low reproducibility was found.

23
Q

Meta-analysis

A

Statistical analysis of results of multiple equivalent studies of the same, or very similar, effects in order to assess validity more thoroughly

24
Q

Secondary Data

A

Results gathered from other studies

25
Q

Primary Data

A

Results collected by researchers directly in their studies

26
Q

Experimenter Expectancy

A

Tendency for experimenter’s knowledge of what is being tested to influence the outcome of research