Chapter 21: Use of Models in ERM Flashcards
The uses of models in ERM PADDA PC EFEC:
- Product pricing
- Advice given on risk management
- Day-to-day running
- Decision making
- Allocation of capital
- Project evaluation
- Checks and controls on the business
- Economic value of a company assessed
- Future earnings of the business estimated
- Effect of risk management on the business
- Capital modelling – MCR and economic capital
Causes of inappropriate model/parameter selection HICE AOP
o Data issues: Heterogeneity in the data Insufficient data Completeness of data may lack Errors in historical data o Distribution selection Alternative distributions not properly investigated o Parameter selection Oversimplification
Features of a good actuarial model for ERM application DJ ADI SCARFS
- Documented
- Joint behaviour should be sensible
- Appreciate and communicate workings
- Development and refinement can be done
- Inputs and outputs should be valid for the business modelled
- Implementation methods should be variable
- Independent verification
- Simple, but not overly simplified
- Consistency with past events
- Amendable – after model analysis has been done
- Robust, but still sensitive to plausible future scenarios
- Fit for purpose
- Shortcomings clearly stated
Steps to develop and apply a model PDF PPGT PIROS
- Purpose defined
- Data – collect and group
- Form of model – parameters and variables
- Period of model
- Parameters and correlations
- Goodness of fit assessed
- Project future cashflows
- Trade off in cashflow frequency considered (reliability vs. run time)
- Interactions between variables allowed for
- Run model with past data/stochastic simulations
- Output generated
- Sensitivity and stress testing
How model output should influence decision making in ERM CAPERI
- Corporate risk policy applied
- Alternative decisions identified
- Preferences – deciding between risks on the efficient frontier
- Economic value added by a specific mitigation or action
- Risk appetite tested
- Intuition and judgement
Factors to consider when choosing a model PANDA P SPEC
• Purpose of the model • Appetite for risk of the stakeholders • Nature of the risk o Size o Patterns in the risk o Extreme values o Correlations with other risks • Data - HICE • Alternative models to consider • Parsimony principle
Merits of Deterministic model LECE COS
Less Capital intensive
Explainable - since no distributions are applied
Clarity on scenario tested
Easy and quick to design
Carefully consider which scenarios will be tested
Only point estimates produced
Some scenarios may be missed
Merits of a stochastic model WAQA SLICAH
Wider range of scenarios tested
Assess financial guarantees/assumptions tested
Quality result / Quantify risks better - Statistical analysis performed on the results
Allows for uncertainty and covariance between parameters
Spurious accuracy
Longer construction and run time
Interpretation and communication difficulty
Complex programming/ Costly
Additional capital intensity
Higher risk of model and parameter error due to complex nature