Chapter 2 Lenses for Conceptualizing Problems and Interventions: The Person in the Environment Flashcards
person-in-environment approach
views client problems within the environmental context in which they occur, and it is the cornerstone of social work practice
micro-mezzo-macro approach
helps social workers to view people as active agents whose lives, relationships, and environments are interdependent
micro level
incorporates facets of the individual such as biological, psychological, developmental, spiritual, emotional, cognitive, recreational, and financial aspects of personality and individual functioning considered vital to a person’s well-being
mezzo level
consists of elements in a person’s immediate environment
macro level
includes larger social forces that might affect an individual, such as governmental policy, discrimination, oppression, social policy, economic conditions, societal values, and even historical events
Micro-mezzo-macro levels of conceptualization critiques
many social workers will probably not have time to fully explore the range of issues that may be impacting clients
It cannot be empirically tested
interventions based on this approach can vary a great deal
this approach does not have a consistent set of constructs that can be applied to client situations
biopsychosocial approach
breaks down human behavior into several components that involve a person’s biological, psychological, and social functioning
biological level in the biopsychosocial approach
the client’s diet, health (both past and present), exercise patterns, sexual functioning, medication and substance use, and family health and genetic history - any factor that relates to the client’s biological functioning and affects the client’s well-being
Psychological level in the biopsychosocial approach
The client’s self-esteem, coping skills, mental health (both past and present), personality characteristics, family history of mental illness, spiritual development, and cognitive and emotional development
Social level in the biopsychosocial approach
the client’s work stability, engagement with social activities and recreation, and relationships with family, friends and co-workers
Biopsychosocial approach critiques
too narrow - conceptualizing clients’ functioning from these three realms fails to acknowledge both the complexity of clients’ lives and clients’ interactions with larger social forces
the biopsychosocial approach is too problem-oriented and not sufficiently focused on people’s strengths
It views the individual having the problems as being responsible for causing them
This treatment of individuals can perpetuate an individual’s problems by ignoring larger social issues that can contribute to individual problems and make them more difficult to overcome
debate about whether social workers know enough about biological aspects of human behavior to assess various problems and to incorporate alternative interventions into their work
Systems Theory scholars
Talcott Parsons, Kurt Lewin, Urie Bronfenbrenner, and Ludwig von Bertalanffy
Systems Theory
views human behavior as the result of active interactions between people and their social systems
subsystems
smaller systems within a larger system
boundaries
patterns of behavior that define relationships within systems and give systems their identity
Differentiation
A system’s movement from a simple existence toward a more complex form of functioning, while still maintaining its unique characteristics
Entropy
a system’s movement toward disorganization and death.
Negative entropy
a system’s movement toward growth and development
Equifinality
the tendency for the same end state or outcome in a system to be achieved through many different paths or trajectories
Feedback
A form of input, which informs a system about its performance (can be positive or negative)