Chapter 2 and 3 Powerpoint Flashcards
Recognition (scene)/ Examination (lab)
First Step
To know something because one has seen, heard, or experienced it before
Classification
Second Step
Placing things into groups according to their basic characteristics
The process of placing an object within a similar group of objects
Exclusion is just as important as inclusion
Exclusion
A demonstration that two objects do not have a connection, relationship, or association
Individualization
Third Step
demonstration that an item is unique, even among members of the same class, or that two separate objects were at one time a single object/had a common source or origin
Evaluation
Last Step
the process of putting together the evidence available with the objective of understanding the nature and sequence of events that created it
involves using physical evidence and the analyses on that evidence to understand the events that produced that same evidence
Reconstruction of a Homicide
Bloodstain pattern analysis
Patterns in area where body was found
Patterns in area where body was suspected to be moved from
Nature of the wounds on body
Other physical evidence left behind (casings, weapons, clothing)
Damage
Two or three dimension surfaces on evidence produced by tearing, cutting, breakage, and other processes
Cutting v tearing
Physical match
Deposits
material that is laid down or left behind by a physical process
NOT A DIRECT TRANSFER
Examples: dust on a dresser, blood pattern on floor or wall, cast off pattern on ceiling,pollen on vehicle
Imprints
two dimensional representation of an object left in some sort of medium when it has come into contact with a hard surface (blood, dust, paint, dirt)
Indentation
three dimensional representation of an object when it has been impressed into a soft receiving surface (sand, snow, mud)
Striations
result of a hard surface being marked by a hard object in motion along that surface
motion results in parallel/nearly parallel lines on the hard surface
toolmarks
Purpose of laws
Resolve disputes
enforce order
Probable cause
sufficient reason based on known facts to believe a crime has been committed or that certain property is connected with a crime
1929: Frye v United States
Use of polygraph to determine whether the defendant was being truthful
Court did not allow results
Test is not reliable
1993: Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Concerned with morning sickness drug that may have caused birth defects
Court issues guidelines for deciding the admissibility of scientific evidence in court
determines judge acts as gatekeeper when applying the criteria/guidelines for admitting the evidence
Daubert states that scientific tests must be:
subjected to significant testing
generally accepted (Frye Criterion)
Subjected to error rate analysis
Peer reviewed