Chapter 13 - Social Psych Flashcards
social psychology
- how we think about, influence, and relate to one another (peers, groups, family, etc.)
- focuses on social context and relationships, focuses on normal/everyday people - what do we all have in common?
why do we behave the way we do?
our behaviour is affected by the way others around us behave
social thinking
- how do we think about others, especially when they do something unexpected?
- we attribute behaviour to persons vs. situations
attribution theory
- we have a tendency to give causal explanations for someone’s behaviour (trying to explain why they did what they did)
- either attribute to person (ex. child misbehaved because they’re bad) or situation (ex. child misbehaved because the class was boring)
fundamental attribution error
- tendency to overestimate the impact of personal disposition and underestimate the impact of the situation when explaning behaviour of others
- ex. person trips on sidewalk -> we tend to think they’re clumsy rather than the sidewalk was uneven
- we don’t do this with our own behaviour -> we tend to emphasize the situation
effects of attribution
how we explain someone’s behaviour affects how we react to it
self-serving bias
people take credit for success, deny responsibility for failure
attitude
- a belief/feeling that predisposes a person to RESPOND in a particular way to objects, people, and events
- imperfect predictor - other factors (ex. external situation) can also influence behaviour
- actions can affect attitudes: not only do people stand for what they believe in, they start believing in what they stand for
foot in the door phenomenon
tendency for people who have first agreed to a small request to comply later with a larger request
cognitive dissonance
- when our attitudes and actions aren’t consistent, we feel tension that causes us to change one or the other
- ex. knowing that smoking is harmful, but you smoke -> you’ll either stop smoking because it’s harmful or continue smoking and ignore its harmful effects
social influence
how social factors influence attitudes, beliefs, decisions, and actions
conformity
adjusting one’s behaviour or thinking to comply with a group standard
chameleon effect/automatic mimicry
conformity at its most basic - our brain unconsciously monitors what’s going on and primes us to act in a similar way
2 reasons for conformity
- normative social influence: conforming in order to fit in
- informative social influence: conforming for informational purposes when we don’t know what to do
group pressure and conformity
- results from one’s willingness to accept others’ opinions about reality
- solomon asch’s line experiment - lots of people conformed and said the answer they knew was wrong simply because everyone before them had said it
- even if 1 other person says the right answer, you’re much more likely to give the right answer
informative social influence
- conforming for informational purposes (ie. eyewitness id)
- when something is really important and hard to know, we conform rather than trusting our judgement
- when something is really important and easy to know, we trust our judgement rather than conforming
- when something isn’t important, there’s an equal amount of conformity and trusting our own judgement
extreme conformity and role-playing
- when we’re in situations where we don’t feel personally accountable, we do things we would never ordinarily do
- when we’re given a role, we strive to follow the social perscriptions until you literally become that role
- ex. Stanford Prison experiement
Milgram experiments
- effect of authority on obedience
- under what situation will someone be more likely to give lethal shocks? CONTEXT is more important than individual
when is obedience highest?
- authority figure is salient (next to you)
- authority figure had prestige (prestigious uni, dr. instead of grad student)
- victim depersonalized (in another room)
- no models for defiance (you didn’t see anyone else resisting)
various types of groups
- 1 person affecting another
- families
- teams
- communities
social facilitation
- refers to improved performance on tasks in the presence of others (or if you’re bad at the task to begin with, you’ll become worse in the presence of others)
- ex. cyclist’s race times were faster when they competed against others vs. competing against the clock
- social facilitation may be present amongst cockroaches as well
social loafing
- tendency of an individual in a group to exert less effort towards attaining a common goal than when tested individually
- ex. “it’s fine to throw away one plastic bottle, everyone else recycles, so my behaviour won’t make a huge difference”
deindividuation
- loss of self-awareness and self-restraint in group situations that foster arousal and anonymity
- ex. vancouver rioters, youtube/online comments where you’re anonymous
group polarization
- enhances a group’s prevailing attitudes through discussion
- if a group is like-minded, discussion strenghtens its prevailing opinions and attitudes
- ex. if someone is highly prejudiced and gets put in a group with other highly prejudiced people, their prejudice strengthens
groupthink
- occurs when the desire for harmony in a decision-making group overrides the realistic appraisal of alternatives
- ex. John F. Kennedy in cuban missile crisis -> got caught up in excitement and nobody wanted to be the person to dampen the mood
prejudice
- unjustifiable (usually negative) attitude towards a group and its members (ex. racial, ethnic, cultural groups)
- prejudice has decreased, but is still present