chapter 13: power and politics Flashcards
power
power simply refers to the capacity, discretion, and means to enforce one’s will over others.
someone can thus have power but not use it; a powerful person has discretion over when to exercise their power.
dependence
Probably the most important aspect of power is that it is a function of dependence.The more people rely or depend upon the powerful person (who controls something the others rely on or want), the more powerful that person becomes. When people begin to have more alternatives and options or begin to rely on themselves or different people, the powerful person loses power.
power vs. leadership
A careful comparison of our description of power with our description of leadership in the chapter on leadership reveals the concepts are closely intertwined. How are the two terms different? Power does not require goal compatibility, just dependence. Leadership, on the other hand, requires some congruence between the goals of the leader and those being led
power has two general groupings
power into two general groupings—formal and personal—and breaking down each into more specific categories
formal power
Formal power is based on an individual’s position in an organization. It can come from the ability to coerce or reward or from legitimate authority.
coercive power (formal power)
The coercive power base depends on the target’s fear of negative results from failing to comply or acting in a way that would anger the power-holder.
A sales consultant may remain silent after witnessing their supervisor falsify their team’s sales numbers for fear of being terminated or demoted, being assigned to undesirable regions or clients, and/or being treated in an embarrassing way in front of the rest of the team
reward power (formal power)
The opposite of coercive power is reward power, which people comply with because it produces positive benefits; someone who can distribute rewards that others view as valuable can have power over them.
For instance, the sales team lead who rewards compliant team members with lead information is exercising reward power. Alternatively, these rewards can be financial—such as setting pay rates, raises, and bonuses—or nonfinancial, including recognition, promotions, interesting work assignments, friendly colleagues, and preferred work shifts or sales territories.
legitimate power (formal power)
The most common way to access one or more of the power bases is probably through legitimate power. It represents the formal authority to control and use organizational resources based on the person’s structural position in the organization. In general, when school principals, bank presidents, or army captains speak, teachers, tellers, and first lieutenants usually comply
personal power
Many people can have power, even if they are not managers and if they have no formal power. What they have is personal power, which comes from an individual’s unique characteristic
expert power (personal power)
Expert power is based on expertise, special skills, or knowledge. As jobs become more specialized, we become dependent on experts to achieve goals. It is generally acknowledged that physicians have expertise and hence expert power:
ironically, expert power can occasionally have a detrimental effect on knowledge worker team performance. For instance, in times of turbulence, knowledge worker teams that rely too much on experts who have “entrenched” knowledge or perspectives on the problem
referent power (personal power)
Referent power is based on identification with a person who has desirable resources or personal traits.
If I like, respect, and admire you, you can exercise power over me because I want to please you. Some people who are not in formal leadership positions have referent power and exert influence over others because of their charismatic dynamism, likability, and emotional appeal.
Referent power develops out of admiration of another and a desire to be like that person. It helps explain, for instance, why celebrities are paid millions of dollars to endorse products in commercials.
Which bases of power are most effective?
Of the bases of power, which are most effective? This is a complicated question. Regarding the dependents in the power relationship, different bases of power are effective depending upon the perceptions and characteristics of the dependent.
It does appear though, that referent power can be an especially powerful motivator
explain the role of dependence in power relationships: the general dependence postulate
The general dependence postulate: “Let us begin with a general postulate: The greater B’s dependence on A, the more power A has over B. When you possess anything others require that you alone control, they can become dependent on you and, therefore, you may gain power over them”
What creates dependence? “Dependence increases when the resource you control is important, scarce, and non substitutable”
- importance
“If nobody wants what you have, it is not going to create dependence. Note, however, that there are many degrees of importance, from needing the resource for survival to wanting a resource that is in fashion, adds to convenience, or is of relational importance - scarcity
“When the supply of labor is low relative to demand, workers can negotiate compensation and benefits packages far more attractive than those in occupations with an abundance of candidates.” - nonsubstitability
“The fewer viable substitutes for a resource, the more power a person controlling that resource has.”
formal small-group networks: chain, wheel and all channel
Formal organizational networks can be complicated, including hundreds of people
and a half dozen or more hierarchical levels.
2. These networks are condensed into three common small groups of five people each
(see Exhibit 13-1): chain, wheel, and all-channel.
“The chain rigidly follows the formal chain of command; this network approximates the communication channels you might find in a rigid three-level organization.
The wheel relies on a central figure to act as the conduit for all group communication; it simulates the communication network you might find in a work group directed by a manager.
The manager’s central role (especially in larger work groups) enables them to enjoy access to diverse ideas and knowledge, support, and higher power and status.
The all-channel network permits group members to actively communicate with each other; it is most often characterized by self-managed teams, in which group members are free to contribute and no single person takes on a leadership role.”
–> The all-channel network is best if you desire high member satisfaction, and the
chain is best if accuracy is most important.
node and ties
Within a social network, or connections between people who share professional interests, each individual or group is called a node, and the links between nodes are called ties.
When nodes communicate or exchange resources frequently, they are said to have very strong ties.
Other nodes that are not engaged in direct communication with one another achieve resource flows through intermediary nodes. In other words, some nodes act as brokers between otherwise unconnected nodes.