Chapter 13 Flashcards

1
Q

Conflict

A

disagreement that occurs when the actions or beliefs of one or more members of the
group are unacceptable to and resisted by one or more of the other members. Follows a cycle:
disagreement > conflict > escalation –> de-escalation > resolution.

  • Intergroup conflict = conflict between two or more groups.
  • Intragroup conflict = conflict within a group.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intergroup conflict

A

conflict between two or more groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Intragroup conflict

A

conflict within a group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Causes of conflicts

A
Most common sources of conflicts:
 (1) competition
(2) conflicts over the distribution of
resources
(3) power struggles
(4) task and process conflicts
(5) personal conflicts.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mixed-motive situations

A

performance setting in which the interdependence
among interactants involves both competitive and cooperative goal structures. 
They stimulate conflict, because they tempt individuals to compete rather than
cooperate (e.g. Prisoner’s dilemma game (PDG) = players must make either
cooperative or competitive choices in order to win).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Prisoner’s dilemma game (PDG)

A

players must make either

cooperative or competitive choices in order to win

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Behavioral assimilation

A

the eventual matching of the behaviors displayed by
cooperating or competing group members. Is caused by the norm of reciprocity;
competition sparks competition (negative reciprocity), and cooperation provokes
cooperation (positive reciprocity).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

social value orientation

SVO

A

tendency to respond to conflict settings in a proself or prosocial way; co-
operators tend to make choices that benefit both parties, whereas competitors act
to maximize their own outcomes. Four kinds of people:
1. Individualists: are proself and concerned only with their own outcomes.
2. Competitors: are proself and strive to maximize their own outcomes, but
they also seek to minimize others’ outcomes.
3. Co-operators: are both prosocial and proself, so strive to maximize both their
own outcomes and others’ outcomes.
4. Altruists: are prosocial but not proself, so are motivated to help others who
are in need.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Individualists

A

are proself and concerned only with their own outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Competitors

A

are proself and strive to maximize their own outcomes, but

they also seek to minimize others’ outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Co-operators

A

are both prosocial and proself, so strive to maximize both their
own outcomes and others’ outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Altruists

A

are prosocial but not proself, so are motivated to help others who
are in need.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

commons dilemma / social trap

A

social dilemma
when individuals can maximize their outcome by seeking personal goals rather than
the collective goals, but if too many individuals act selfishly, then all members of the
collective will experience losses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

free-riding, and public goods dilemma

A

social dilemma when one may/may not contribute any resources in support of a public
good but also cannot be excluded for failing to contribute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

negative inequity

A

being sensitive to unfair distributions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Balance theory

A

group members will respond negatively when they disagree with
those they like or agree with those they dislike. Conflict is greatest when group
members both disagree with and dislike each other.

17
Q

Why does conflict escalate:

A
  • Commitment: becoming more committed to a position when defending viewpoints in group
    setting.
  • Misperception: misperceive others and assume that the other party’s behavior is caused by
    personal (dispositional) rather than situational (environmental) factors (e.g., fundamental
    attribution error).
  • Tactics: members shift from soft to hard tactics.
  • Negative reciprocity
  • Angry emotions
  • The formation of coalitions
18
Q

Group members managing conflicts through:

A

Negotiation

Actively communicating information about motives and goals

Dual concern model = four tactics of dealing with conflicts that differ along the dimensions
(1) Concern for self, and (2) Concern for others:

  1. Avoiding
  2. Yielding
  3. Fighting
  4. Cooperating

Responding to competition with tit-for-tat (TFT) strategy

Expressing positive emotions

Using third-party interventions

19
Q

distributive negotiation

A

dividing up resources

20
Q

integrative

negotiation

A

identifying the issues underlying the conflict and working together to find a
solution that is satisfying to all parties

21
Q

Dual concern model

A

four tactics of dealing with conflicts that differ along the dimensions

(1) Concern for self, and (2) Concern for others:
1. Avoiding: passive way to deal with conflict.
2. Yielding: passive, prosocial way to deal with conflict.
3. Fighting: active, proself way to deal with conflict.
4. Cooperating: active, prosocial way to deal with conflict.

  • Personal conflicts may not yield to cooperative negotiations, but more to the
    avoiding method
22
Q

tit-for-tat (TFT) strategy

A

bargaining strategy that begins
with cooperation, but then imitates the other person’s choice so that cooperation is met
with cooperation and competition with competition.

23
Q

Mediating: can be done in three ways:

A
  1. Inquisitorial procedure = mediator questions the two parties and then hands
    down a verdict that the two parties must accept.
  2. Arbitration = disputants present their arguments to the mediator, who then
    basis his decision on the information they provide.
  3. Moot = disputants and mediator openly and informally discuss problems and
    solutions, but the mediator can make no binding decisions
24
Q

Inquisitorial procedure

A

mediator questions the two parties and then hands

down a verdict that the two parties must accept.

25
Q

Arbitration

A

disputants present their arguments to the mediator, who then

basis his decision on the information they provide

26
Q

Moot

A

disputants and mediator openly and informally discuss problems and
solutions, but the mediator can make no binding decisions