Chapter 11 Language Flashcards

1
Q

The Mental Lexicon

A
  1. Semantic information
    - the meaning of words
  2. Syntactic information
    - how words are combined to create new meaning
  3. Word forms
    - orthographic (visual) and phonological (sound) structure of words
    - mental lexicon as a dictionary
    - not born with this information; depends on the language you grow up speaking
    - the information is readily available; when people are speaking we can basically instantly understand them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Semantic Network

A
  • words are connected by associations; the more related the words the closer the connection
  • when you think of the word car it partially activates the word street and truck
  • helps us understand how we can think of words
  • when you are trying to think of a word, for example truck, you may think of car and bus and eventually think of oh truck is the word I am looking for
    1. Consistent with the Semantic Priming Effect
  • if the target is a real word and semantically related to prime, you are faster to recognize that flower is the real word
    2. Semantic paraphasia
  • when people use the wrong word
  • Wernicke’s aphasia
  • the incorrect word is not a random word but is associated with the actual word you intend to use
  • milk comes from horses rather than cows or milk comes from animals with cows
  • in an attempt to activate the right word you activate the associated words
    3. People who speak multiple languages
  • when people have damage to one area of the brain, the deficits don’t affect each language equally
  • suggests they are kept separate
  • you don’t get confusion between the mental lexicons of each language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Anomia’s

A

Anomia
- inability to name objects, but can tell what they are used for
Category-Specific Anomia
- Animate vs. inanimate distinction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Three Models for Anomia

A
  1. Physical vs. Functional Properties
    - learning about animals vs learning about tools
    - animals are visual while tools are visual, motor, and tactile associations
    - where this semantic information is stored depends on how you learn about the objects
  2. Fundamental Categorical Organization
    - the reason people can’t name animals but can name scissors is because they are stored in different parts of the brain
    - temporal lobe damage seems to have areas for persons, animals, and tools
    - problems: animate anomia is most common but this theory would mean there is an equal occurrence
  3. Complexity of Features
    - when you are trying to find the word in the mental lexicon for animal it requires more complex activation than for non-animals
    - blade and cuts you are going to think of knife whereas with tiger you need more associations to identify it correctly
    - if the mental lexicon is damages you lose some of the associations which is why anomia for animals is more common
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Language Comprehension

A
  • different mechanisms for spoken vs written word

- phonological input code vs. orthographic input code

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The Segmentation Problem

A
  • if you look at the sound waves of a sentence, it looks like two words rather than four
  • in captain there appears to be two words rather than one
  • earlier model doesn’t account for this because it assumes mental lexicon does not get involved until later
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Top-Down Processing

A
  • brain figures out what the words probably are before the actual word
  • the brain perceives letters differently because it uses the mental lexicon to determine what the words are trying to say
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Top-Down Influences on Speech Comprehension

A
  • you dropped your train ticket example
  • you can understand when you have a comprehension of what it is trying to say
  • if you don’t have a mental lexicon for a language it will al sound like mumble jumble; you can’t pick out individual words and meanings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Brain areas for Speech Perception and Language Comprehension

A
  • primary auditory cortex; high acoustic means they care a lot about the sound properties of what you are listening to
  • acoustic sensitivity goes down when you move to other areas and are more focused on things like language content rather than high or low voices
  • as you go from high to low acoustic you are going from low to high language sensitivity
  • language sounds are phonemes; english uses 44
  • when you grow up hearing english you lose sensitivity to phonemes of other languages like Chinese
  • babies are sensitive to all phonemes
  • superior temporal sulcus is where the brain starts to distinguish language sounds from other sounds
  • inferior temporal lobes
  • left frontal lobe has neurons with speech comprehension
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

N400 Response

A
  • where does the brain distinguish semantic information
  • specific response to the word socks because it doesn’t make sense N400 response
  • N400 response negative response 400 ms after the person read the word socks
  • the brain goes hey this meaning doesn’t match the semantics
  • the third sentence (capitalized) was used to test if the N400 was just due to a surprise rather than semantic mismatch; different response of P560
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Synaptic Positive Shift

A
  • not a semantic mismatch
  • throw and throws are the same lexeme; the idea behind a word or phrase
  • results in P600
  • suggests that the semantic analysis comes before the syntactic analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ERPs & Language Deficits

A
  • N400 response is shorter and delayed in low comprehenders
  • the brain response to the oddness of socks suggesting the timing is very important, if you throw off the the timing of one step what happens?
  • what if the semantic processing isn’t done yet when you are ready to analyze the syntactic information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Speech Production

A
  • shape of mouth, vocal cords, diaphragm, pauses between words, breaths, timing is crucial
  • self-monitoring arrow; to make sure what you are saying matches the concept you are trying to convey, requires us to understand the language we are trying to put together
  • lexical selection involves selecting lemmas; the default version of an idea even though there are different forms of the idea “to dance” “to run” “to climb”
  • morphological encoding is changing something to fit the grammar of the sentence; changing run to ran or runs
  • morpheme
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ECoG Recording During Speech Production

A
  • electrodes are actually on the brain

- three fairly distinct phases as this person generates speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lexical, Grammatical, and Phonological Processing 3 Phases

A
  1. first phase 200 ms
    - lexical frequency, common everyday or one that is not used often but still understood
    - bigger response to rare word than the common word
    - it is easier to find a common word in your mental lexicon and harder to find a rare word
  2. second phase 320 ms
    - asked the participant to do different things with the word
    - asked the person to read the word and did not get a big response
    - asked the person to read the word and insert it into the sentence to make it grammatically correct you get a much bigger response regardless if they did or did not have to modify the word
    - morphological encoding
  3. third phase 450 ms
    - phonological encoding
    - they found the more syllables the more processing was required at the third phase
    - more to do with how the word sounded rather than the morphological form
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Aphasias

A
  • any language disorder that is not attributed to some other non-language deficit
  • Sarah, stroke survivor, 19
  • struggles to get words into sentences and to get them out’- can comprehend what is being said but could not express
  • when words were said they were pronounced correctly
  • writing words down helps her speech production
  • Broca’s expressive aphasia
17
Q

Broca’s (Expressive) Aphasia

A
  1. the case of Leborgne
    - lost the ability to communicate when he was in his 30s
    - couldn’t talk or write but could understand everything
    - could only say one word
    - Hodor GoT had expressive aphasia
    - Broca was brought in to look at his infected leg but dissected his brain after death
    - damage to left inferior frontal lobe
    - we speak with the left hemisphere”
  2. Symptoms of Broca’s Aphasia
    - non-fluent telegraphic speech “English class read tingle”
    - sometimes dysarthia; inability to control the muscles involved in articulating speech
    - comprehension normal
    • except for agramatism; difficulty in understanding usually complex grammar
    • Broca has a role in syntactic comprehension
18
Q

Where is Broca’s area + other structures implicated in the aphasia

A
  • left inferior frontal lobe is Broca’s area

- most people who have damage in Broca’s typically have damage under that area as well producing expressive aphasia

19
Q

Wernicke’s Area

A
  • found patients that could not comprehend language but did not have difficulty in getting speech out
  • damage was in the posterior temporal gyrus in the left hemisphere
  • arcuate fasciculus; bundle of white matter that contains axons from cells in Wernicke’s area that travel up and to Broca’s area
  • this connection is super important for self monitoring and for repeating back words spoken to us quickly
20
Q

Conduction Aphasia

A
  • Wernicke hypothesized that there was another aphasia resulting from disconnecting the two areas by damaging the arcuate fasciculus
  • they do not have trouble understanding and their speech is fluent because there is nothing wrong with the individual areas
  • repetition is severely impaired
  • mistakes with self-monitoring, semantic paraphasia and pseudo words
  • after awhile they are aware they said the wrong word
21
Q

Wernicke’s (Receptive) Aphasia

A
  • if someone who spoke a language you did not understand you would not know there was anything wring with them rather in broca’s aphasia you could tell
  • Wernicke’s aphasia patients do not have self-monitoring capabilities
  • They can understand tone of voice like question, anger, happiness, this is usually attributed to the right hemisphere so testing for comprehension has to be very careful
  • typical symptoms:
    Fluent speech
    Incorrect word use
    Unaware of mistakes
    Difficulty comprehending spoken and written language
22
Q

transcortical motor aphasia

A
  • No problem with comprehension
  • Can’t take an idea and express that by generating speech
  • Non-fluent speech self-generated speech
  • Basically Broca’s but repetition is intact with fluent speech
  • loss of connection between motor/broca and b/concept
23
Q

transcortical sensory aphasia

A
  • Can’t convert something heard into an idea in their own head
  • Low comprehension
  • Fluent speech is not affected
  • Basically Wernicke’s but repetition is intact
  • Tend to repeat words back
  • loss of connection between wernicke/auditory and b/concept
24
Q

Language Network View

A
  • a big chunk of the left hemisphere is a part of the circuitry
  • two dorsal networks and two ventral networks can be broadly understood to carry out the language functions
  • dorsal network repetition and self monitoring and complex syntax circuit Broca’s
  • Ventral network involved in semantic processing and syntactic basic processing
25
Q

Variation in the Organization of Language Areas

A
  • surgeon stimulated different areas of the brain before surgery
  • areas where you get naming areas
  • surgeon cut around naming error areas
  • in Patient 2, cut around Wernicke’s area, but in Patient 1, the same are did no evoke any areas and was cut out
  • makes sense that there is tremendous amount of variability in these systems
  • not just about genetics but about experience