Ch. 7 Flashcards

1
Q

family systems approach

A

provides framework for making sense of complex interactions within a family

-family as composed of people and relationships in the system, interconnected and requiring adjustment after disequilibrium caused by changes within people or relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

dyadic subsystem

A

2 person connection between each person, and combinations of 3+ people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

2 principles of family systems

A

1) subsystems influence each other in family
2) change in system results in disequilibrium until adjustment occurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

boundaries

A

implicit rules that govern subsystem interactions

-dictate what behaviors and communications are acceptable for family members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3 aspects of family systems with implications for adolescents

A

1) parent changes at midlife
2) sibling relationships
3) extended family relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

parent changes at midlife

A

adolescence and emerging adulthood tend to overlap with parents processing midlife

-time of high satisfaction than crisis

-increase in wisdom, psychological health, competence, respect from others, financial and social opportunities

-decrease in energy, health, creativity, physical appearance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how accurate is the empty nest syndrome?

A

emerging adults’ autonomy may be welcomed by most parents, giving them time to focus on paths

-stereotype is that it is difficult for parents

-84% of midlife adults missed children

-60% enjoyed having more time with partner and themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

5 patterns sibling relationships

A

1) caregiver
2) buddy
3) casual
4) rival
5) critical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

caregiver

A

parental functions served by sibling

-often older/younger sibling roles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

buddy

A

siblings are friends, acting like one another

-wanting to be together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

casual

A

siblings have little to do with one another

-lack of closeness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

rival

A

competition and measuring success against one another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

critical

A

high level of conflict and teasing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how does divorce affect sibling relationships?

A

increased hostility and warmth (intensity)

-support and shared experience persists, leaving them closer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

extended family

A

80% of American adolescents list at least 1 extended family member among the most important people

-closeness to grandparents is positively correlated to well-being for adolescents, though time spent with extended family decreases over adolescents

-in divorced families, adolescents have greater contact with maternal grandfathers who provide financial or emotional support and role-modeling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

extended family support

A

in traditional cultures, young men stay in family home when they marry
–women live with husbands’ family

-living with extended family members promotes closeness with grandparents > parents
–grandparents focus more on nurturing and less on authority and control

-promote academic and social success

17
Q

4 parenting roles

A

characterized by variance in demands and responsiveness

1) authoritative
2) permissive
3) authoritarian
4) disengaged

18
Q

authoritative

A

high demands and responsiveness

-adolescent outcomes: independent, creative, self-assured, socially skilled

19
Q

permissive

A

low demands, high responsiveness

-adolescent outcomes: dependent, passive, conforming

20
Q

authoritarian

A

high demands, low responsiveness

-adolescent outcomes: irresponsible, conforming, immature

21
Q

disengaged

A

low demands and responsiveness

-adolescent outcomes: impulsive, delinquent, early sex, drugs

22
Q

reciprocal effects

A

parenting style doesn’t create a person

-children bring personalities and goals to parenting relationship

-causality isn’t uni-directional

-evocative -> enviro. effects:
–aggressive adolescents invoke authoritative parenting

–mild-tempered adolescents evoke permissive parenting because they don’t seem to require boundaries or oversight

23
Q

differential parenting

A

parents are perceived by acting differently towards children
–may be result of authentic differences drawn out by evocative -> enviro. effects

-perceptions of parenting may be more so the perception of adolescents

-adolescents perceiving parents as authoritative -> happier and better functioning

24
Q

nonshared environments

A

evidence for differential parenting in terms of warmth and negativity
–the more closely related siblings were genetically, the more similar their experience of parental negativity was
(evocative -> enviro. effect

-adolescents’ reports have more negativity than parents’

-discrepant ratings in younger adolescents have poorer outcomes

25
Q

culture and parenting style

A

dominated by American ideals of independence and individuality
–hard to apply to traditional or collectivist cultures

-in traditional cultures, parents expect their rules and wishes to be obeyed
–success not defined in terms of becoming a strong individual with personal satisfaction outside of membership to cultural institutions

-from culture of 1800s to 2000s in US, functions for adolescents changed from all (edu., religion, med. care, economic support, recreation and emotional support/affective) to just affective/emotional support

26
Q

divorce processes

A

adolescents whose parents had divorced in childhood are at risk for psychological and behavioral issues

-adolescents show fewer effects of divorce than younger children

-as emerging adults, effects of divorce center on anxiety in considering marriage, knowing it can end in divorce and not wanting to repeat patterns

-parenting styles may equalize back to pre-divorce status
–less affectional and consistent and more permissive before/after divorce

-closeness with fathers declines after divorce
–at age 15, adolescents in divorced families live an avg. of 400 miles from father
–half haven’t seen him in a year

-economic stress