Ch 4 behaviour and attitudes Flashcards
What are attitudes?
are essentially an evaluation they are our opinion of something that we store in memory
Why are attitudes useful? (there are 5 functions)
1) Knowledge Function our attitudes help us manage and simplify information processing because we learn and retain information, we know what we like and don’t like
2) Utilitarian Function they guide our behaviour toward value goals and away from aversive events
3) Value-Expressive Function our attitudes serve to help us express our values and communicate them to others - share positive interests
4) Social Adjustment Function our attitudes can help us fit in our social groups; we are motivated to hold attitudes that will be approved of by others
5) Ego-Defensive Function our attitudes can serve to protect our self-esteem or justify actions that make us feel guilty (Terror Management Theory)
ex one-way children might defend themselves against the feelings of humiliation they have experienced in P.E. lessons is to adopt a strongly negative attitude to all sports.
Pluralistic Ignorance
when we think we have a good idea of what our group holds but we are not right
Terror Management Theory
we are the only species to think about our death that one day we will die which causes anxiety. We want to feel like we have left something behind or we are good enough to go to the afterlife. It motivates us to keep good self-esteem. This need for self-esteem can be served by denigrating outgroups, we say my group is better than yours, we will leave something behind.
- Therefore, negative attitudes towards an outgroup can help us meet the need for self-esteem
- thinking of death to need for self-esteem-to denigrating outgroups
The Tripartite Theory ( attitudes hold 3 components)
A ffect - is our emotional reaction to an attitude/object
B ehaviour - we approach/avoid an attitude
C ogition - is our knowledge about an attitude object
most attitudes are made up of these 3 components and vary depending on the person (diamonds for me)
Attitudes not always predict behaviour so, The attitude-behaviour problem by Corey 1937
-assessed attitudes towards cheating
-he gave the students tests then he graded them, however, gave the test back to a student without a grade
-and told the students to grade their own tests
-then he measured between his graded work and their own
Found:
attitudes towards cheating did not actually predict cheating behaviour
The attitude-behaviour problem by Wicker 1971
he found no good evidence that attitudes were a good predictor of behaviour
When do attitudes predict behaviour? For a better predictor
When the attitude matched the behaviour
-the concept of specificity matching, the attitude will predict behaviour if you match them in terms of action target context and time
Specificity Matching - Davidson and Jaccard (1979)
-asked women about their attitudes toward birth control using different levels of specificity
-asked 2 years later if they were taking birth control
-assessed the correlation between different classes of attitude measurement and behaviour
Found:
-when is matched their behaviour it does a good job predicting they were taking birth control pills two years later
-Attitude toward using birth control pills during the next two years was the highest level of correspondence
Ajzen and Fishbein 1977 assed attitude-behaviour consistency with correspondence as a moderator
low correspondence (general attitudes) there is no correlation to attitudes and behaviour high correspondence (specific attitudes) there is a correlation to attitudes and behaviour
Attitude and Behaviour Relationship - Theory of Reasoned Action Model
suggests that a person’s behaviour is determined by their intention to perform the behaviour and that this intention is, in turn, a function of their attitude toward the behaviour and subjective norms
ex if our attitude leads us to want to go out on a date but we have no money, our lack of money will prevent our attitude from causing us to go on a date.
-attitudes + subjective norms = intentions + = behaviour
Theory of Reasoned Action Model became …
Theory of planned behaviour - used to understand and predict behaviours, which posits that behaviours are immediately determined by behavioural intentions and under certain circumstances, perceived behavioural control
-attitudes + subjective norms + perceived behaviour control = intentions + = behaviour
Introspection Research by Wilson
Introspection is the examination of one’s own conscious thoughts and feelings
-ahead of time experts tested these samples and rated them
-he got students to taste 5 different strawberry jams and then rated them
-control group: just rated the jams
-reason group: rated the jams and gave reasons why
Found:
-control group scored high with these experts but
-reason group scored low with these experts
cognitively based attitudes are less likely than affectively based attitude to be disrupted by introspecting because we find it easier to come up with a reason for cognitively based attitudes and somewhat hard to come up with a reason or to articulate reasons for affectively based attitudes
What are other predictors of strong attitude behaviour relationships (hint 3)
1) short time interval: less time to change the attitude
2) based on direct experience: (Regan and Fazio, 1977, played the puzzle or heard about it, then rated their attitudes on the puzzle, they were allowed to play with the puzzle, in the end, negative attitudes - those who heard about it, never played with it even if they had that chance in the end)
3) making participants self-aware: answer questions in front of a mirror vs not, they are more likely to behave accordingly with their attitudes facing the mirror
What do strong attitudes predict? (hint 4)
persistent
resistance
impact in information processing and judgment
impact on behaviour