Ch 2 Flashcards

1
Q

continuously improve on tentative answers to questions

A

goal of research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the exploration of the unknown and requires gathering data

A

research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

There are no perfect indicators of personality; there are only clues, and clues are always ambiguous

A

Funder’s Second Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Something beats nothing, two times out of three

A

Funder’s Third Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Psychologist’s job

A

gather as many clues as possible and put them together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  • usually questionnaires or surveys
  • high face validity

advantages: you are always with yourself and people are their own best experts. access to thoughts, feelings, and intentions. definition truth, casual force (self-efficacy and self-verification), simple and easy)

disadvantages: overly positive/negative, faking, fish-and-water effect, distortion of memory, lack of self-insight, carelessness, too simple and too easy

A

S Data: Self-Judgments or Self-Reports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • acquaintances, co-workers, clinical psychologists
  • may be more accurate than self-judgments for extremely desirable or undesirable traits

Advantages: a large amount of information, real-world basis (not controlled), likely to be relevant, common sense, definitional truth, causal force

Disadvantages: limited behavioural information, lack of access to private experiences, error, bias

A

I Data: Informant Report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  • obtained from archival records/self-report
  • the results, or “residue”, of personality

Advantages: objective, verifiable, intrinsic importance, psychological relevance.

Disadvantage: multidetermination, (may be determined by different factors)

A

L Data: Life Outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  • observations in daily life/in a lab
  • can be from certain kinds of personality tests

Advantages: can tap into many types of behaviors and it is obtained through direct observations, so its objective, realistic

Disadvantages: difficult + expensive to gather, and has superficial objectivity (lab)

A

B Data: Behavioural Data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

stability + repeatability of measurements

A

reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the degree that the measurement is successful in what it intended to measure

A

validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

states versus traits

A

state: what’s happening for you right now
traits: a little bit more long-term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  • low precision of measurement
  • the state of the participant
  • the state of the experimenter
  • variation in the environment
A

factors that undermine reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  • being careful
  • using a constant, scripted, procedure
  • measure something that is important and engages participants
    -aggregation
A

enhancing reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

reliability is necessary but not sufficient for

A

validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

an idea about a psychological attribute that goes beyond what might be assessed through any particular method of assessment (cannot be seen)

A

constructs

17
Q

can it be applied to all? is it generalizable? a concept that includes reliability and validity

A

Generalizability

18
Q

closely studying a particular person or event to find out as much as possible

advantages: describes the whole phenomenon, source for ideas (gives better information) sometimes necessary for understanding an individual

disadvantage: unknown generalizability (it’s impossible to know who and to what extent the findings applies to)

A

case method (research design)

19
Q

determines causality between the independent variable (x) and the dependent variable (y).

A

experimental method (research design)

20
Q

establishes a relationship between two variables (x) and (y), by measuring both in a sample of participants

A

correlational method (research design)

21
Q

the experimental method manipulates the presumed causal variable and the correlational method…

A

measures it

22
Q

only experiments can asses

A

causality (because there might be third-variable problems and unknown direction of cause)