Causation and Causal Inference Flashcards

1
Q

● Without it an outcome will not be observed even if other conditions are satisfied

A

NECESSARY CAUSE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

● A malnourished individual will not develop TB if the individual has not acquired the mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria

A

NECESSARY CAUSE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

“consists of several components that interact to promote the occurrence of the outcome”

A

SUFFICIENT CAUSE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

•The causes other than necessary cause, complementing or helping the necessary cause are considered as

A

components of the cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Epidemiologic Triad

A

Host, Agent, Environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

This model implies that an interplay of these factors must be analyzed and understood for comprehension and predictions of patterns of disease

A

Epidemiologic Triangle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In this model the host and agent are at opposite ends of a hypothetical lever for which the environment serves as the fulcrum

A

Epidemiologic Lever

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The hub or center of the wheel represents the host and the surrounding is the biological, social and physical environment

A

The Wheel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Effects are not due to single isolated causes but develop as a result of chain of causation in which each link can be linked to another

A

The Web of Causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A process of proving that a particular hypothesis is a real one and causal

A

Causal Inference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A small association does not mean that there is not a causal effect

A

Strength

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Consistent findings observed by different persons in different places with different samples strengthens the likelihood of an effect

A

Consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Causation is likely if a very specific population at a specific site and disease with no other likely explanation.
-The more specific an association between a factor and an effect is, the bigger the probability of a causal relationship.

A

Specificity:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The effect has to occur after the cause (and if there is an expected delay between the cause and expected effect, then the effect must occur after that delay).

A

Temporality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Greater exposure should generally lead to greater incidence of the effect.
• However, in some cases, the mere presence of the factor can trigger the effect.

A

Biological gradient:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Coherence between epidemiological and laboratory findings increases the likelihood of an effect.
• However, Hill noted that “… lack of such [laboratory] evidence cannot nullify the epidemiological affect on associations”

A

Coherence

17
Q

removal of the possible cause lead to reduction of the disease risk

A

Reversibility