Case Law Flashcards

1
Q

Terry v. Ohio

A

Stop and frisk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Michigan v. Long

A

Extended the permissible scope of a protective search for weapons beyond the actual person to include passenger compartment of a vehicle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Doctor v .State

A

Plain Feel doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

C.A.M. v. State

A

another plain feel doctrine case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tennessee v. Garner

A

use of force to stop fleeing felon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Graham v. Connor

A

Using only the amount of force necessary to overcome resistance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Brinegar v. United States

A

Probable Cause and abandoning an arrest when probable cause disappears.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Aguilar v. Texas

A

Arrest w/ warrant is preferred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Freeman v. State

A

May not make an L&P arrest unless all of the elements of the crime are committed in officer’s presence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Miami v. Crouch

A

Promptness of a misdemeanor arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hoffa v. United States

A

Promptness of felony arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Florida V. Royer

A

Seizures tantamount to arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

McAnnis v. State

A

Defines the necessary elements for a formal arrest to take place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

According to McAnnis v. State, for formal arrest to take place, there needs to be four elements, what are they?

A
  1. Intention to arrest
  2. an actual or constructive seizure or detention
  3. communication
  4. understanding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

United States v. Hensley

A

investigative stop based on bolo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Carroll v. State

A

Fellow officer rule

17
Q

Miranda v. Arizona

A

confessions and admissions

18
Q

What are the 4 concepts of Miranda?

A
  1. custody
  2. interrogation
  3. warning
  4. waiver
19
Q

Pennsylvania v. Mimms

A

Authority to order persons out of a vehicle

20
Q

Harris v. United States

A

Plain view doctrine

21
Q

Carroll v. United States

A

Warrantless vehicle searches

22
Q

New York v. Belton

A

Searching containers in a vehicle

23
Q

Chimel v. California

A

Search Incident to arrest

24
Q

Payton v. New York

A

Entering into a person’s home to effect an arrest

25
Q

South Dakota v Opperman

A

Requires S.O.P. for inventory searches

26
Q

Chadwick v. United States

A

Warrant required if no exigency exists to search containers in a vehicle

27
Q

United States v. Santana

A

Hot Pursuit of suspect into home allowed