Brazil Flashcards
Independence and empire
III. Empire (1822-1889);
|
|—>Pedro I declares independence (1822);
|—> Authoritarian constitution under “enlightened” monarch against slavery (1824);
|—> Abolition of slavery under growing influence of a republican elite vs. land owners (1888);
|—> Coup against Pedro II (1889);
|
IV. First Republic - mirroring US Constitution but strong control of oligarchs (1889-1930);
Portuguese colonization
—> Portugal claims Brazil as exploitation colony (1500);
|—> Super age: many indigenous people die from imported diseases in the trade of slaves
| and 3/4 million slaves are shipped to Brazil (1550-1830);
|—> Napoleon invades Iberia and the Portuguese King moves to Brazil
(1807);
|
II. Foundation of the kingdom of Brazil, linked to the Portuguese
Monarchy (1815);
Series of regimes
1889-1930 first republic: US constitution, oligarchic system
1930-1945 Getulio Vargas establishes authoritarian Estado Novo regime
* Having issues with the former plantation owners
1945-1964 second republic -> military coup
* Bureaucratic regime = allowed for democratic parties, but military kept in power
V. Getúlio Vargas’ establishes authoritarian Estado Novo in the first military coup (1930-1945);
|
|—> Provisional government (1930-1937);
|—> Estado Novo (1937-1945);
|
VI. Second Military coup (1945)
|
VII. Second Republic (1945-1964);
VIII.Military regime (1964-1985);
New republic 1980s transition to democracy
Abertura: controlled transition from military regime to democratic regime
* Church played big role
1988 adoption of new constitution
|—> “Abertura” - controlled transition;
|—> Adoption of new constitution (1988);
|—> Collor de Mello presidency - charged with corruption, impeached and resigns (1989-1992);
|—> Constitutional referendum - 86,6% in favour of Brazil being a republic and 69,2% in favour of
| it being a presidential system (1993);
|—> Economic reforms and uptake (1995); 1993 constitutional referendum
* Last cornerstone of transition to democracy, Brazil decided they didn’t want a monarchy with presidential system
Region cleavage
Strongest cleavage in Brazilian politics
Overlaps with class and race cleavage
Tensions federal government and states (as in USA)
Strong regional identifications and decentralized federalism
50% of wealth is concentrated in the small southern part
Class and religion
Class cleavage is less important despite extreme inequality
- 9th highest level of inequality in the world in 2022 (Luxurious areas vs. Favelas);
- Partly politicised through leftist and rightists parties;
- But overlapping with and overshadowed by regional cleavages;
Religion not very important 75% of population is catholic
Cleavages in general are less important in new democracies such as Brazil
Church crucial in democratic transition process (kinda more left wing)
* Liberation theology
Cleavages race and ethnicity
People identifying as white live in the southern part
Mixed people live in the middle and north
Rainbow nation, lots of people from different heritages
Race class and affirmative action
- partly overlaps with class and race cleavages
President
Directly elected with VP for 4 year term
Maximum 2 consecutive terms, but can return
Appoints cabinet
Initiates legislation 80% and parliament only 20%
Veto powers (can be overturned by simple majority)
Emergency decrees but are limited
impeachment = Chamber of deputy 2/3, senate vote 2/3
|—> 1922 - Collor de Mello resigns before impeachment;
|—> 2016 - Rousseff successfully impeached;
Presidential elections
Two round system (as in France and Russia)
Simultaneous with parliamentary elections
Need for political alliances (coalitional presidentialism)
- Every four years;
- Majoritarian run-off (Two rounds);
- Round 1: all candidates (absolute majority wins - if
not, round 2);
- Round 2: two candidates with most votes in round 1
(absolute majority wins);
- Incites electoral alliance in second round (two bloc
system);
- Ticket: president and vice-president;
Chamber of deputies - Congress
513 members, elected for 4 year terms
Less powerful than constitution suggests
Presidents party needs to form a coalition with lots of different parties
State districts elect members to lower house, each districts elects a different number of people
- Introduces and passes legislation;
- Highly fragmented;
Chamber of deputies elections
Open list pr system
Voting for candidate, not party
Districts = states (8-70 seats)
No electoral threshold
Voting is compulsory
All seats are elected every four years;
- Open-list PR system;
|—> Voting for a candidate, not party;
|—> Seats are distributed proportionally across parties;
|—> Candidates with most votes take their party’s seats;
- District - states (8-70 seats);
Resulting in - extreme fragmentation - weak party discipline - regional identity trumps party identity - Clientelistic practices - Pork-barrel politics and recurrent splitting and switching
Federal senate
81 members, elected for 8 year terms, staggered elections
* Confirming high presidential appointments(e.g. when president appoints ministers)
- Introduces and passes legislation;
- Also significantly fragmented;
Coalitional presidentialism
Presidents never have parliamentary majority
Depend on broad coalition of parties in parliament
Advocates: need for big coalitions, consensual politics, stability
In practice, presidents have to allocate resources to supporting parties
Effects coalitional presidentialism
- Weakens the independent functioning of parliament
- Eradicates programmatic links between politicians and voters
- Produces a lack of accountability and bad governance
- Creates interest group dominance and corruption
- “corruption, rent-seeking and fundamentally flawed ways of conducting political business are integral…”
Federalism and local government
Symmetric, robust federalism but no clear division of tasks
26 states and 1 federal district with elected governors and legislatures
Enhances problems that exist
- 26 states and 1 federal district (Brasilia);
|
|—> Symmetric - same powers for all states;
|—> Competitive - between states and federal levels;
- “Robust” federalism:
- States are politically important;
- Even if nominal powers are limited (and confusing);
|
|—> Reserved federal matters - defense, currency, minerals, etc.
|—> Joint powers: health, culture;
|—> Concurrent powers: health, culture;
|—> Residual powers: state competences;
- Adopted in reaction to centralist empire;
- Frequent of clientelism and corruption;