bowlbys theory of maternal deprivation Flashcards
seperation v deprivation
separation = child not being in the presence of the primary attachment figure
ONLY become an issue when the child is deprived ie they lose an element of care
brief separations are not detrimental it is hone they are prolonged it can be harmful for development
the critical period
bowlby saw the first 30 months of life as a critical period for physchological development. if a child is spectated from thie mother in the absence of suitable substitute careened so deprived of her emotional care for an extended period during the critical period then physchological damage was inveitable
effects on intellectual development
bowlby believed if children were deprived nov maternal care for too long during the critical period they would suffer delayed intellectual development characterised by abnormally low iq .
- GOLDFARB 1947
found Lower iq in children who remained institustions as opposed to those who were fostered and thus had a hugger standard emotional care
effects on emotional development
bowlby identified Affectionless physchopathy as the inability to experience guilt or trying emotions for others
this prevents the person developing normal relationship and is associated with criminality . Affectionless physchopaths cannot appreciate the feelings of victims and so lack remorse for their actions
bowlbys 44 thieves study
aim
to examine the link between Affectionless physchopathy and maternal deprivation
bowlbys 44 thieves study
procedure
sample = 44 criminal teens accuseed of stealing
all thieves were interviewed for signs off Affectionless physcopathy , characterised as a lack of affection lack of guilt about their actions and lack of empathy for their victims.
their families were also interviewed ignorer to establish whether the thieves had prolonged early separations from their mothers
a control group of non criminal but emotionally disturbed young ppl was set up to see how often maternal separation/deprivation occurred
bowlbys 44 thieves study
findings
bowlby 1944 found ;
14/44 thieves could be classed as Affectionless physchopaths
12/14 had experienced prolonged separation fro their mothers in the first two years of life
in contrat 5/30 remaining had experienced separations
control 2/44 experienced separations
bowlbys 44 thieves study
conclusion
prolonged early oration/deprivation caused afectionless physcopathy
limitation
evidence
bowlby drew upon a number of sources for evidence including studies of children orphaned during ww2 (GOLDFARB) this growing up in poor quality orphanages and 44 thieves study.
FLAWED as evidence . war orphans were traumatised and often had poor after care , those factors may have had affect on later development rather then separation.
sismialry children growing up in poor quality orphanages were deprived from numerous elements of care not just maternal .
44 thieves methodology flaws as bobbly main researcher = potential researcher bias .
limitation
counter evidence
not all reach has supported bowlbys findings
HILDA LEWIS 1954
partially replicated the
4 thieves study on a larger scale looking at 500 young people.
in her sample a history of prolonged separation form the mother did not predict crimianlity or difficulty forming close relationships
- a problem for the theory as it suggest there is more factors that may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation
limitation
critical period is more of a sensitive period
’ critical period’ was sued as bowlby believed prolonged separation invetibaly caused damage if it took place within that period
later research shows the image is not inevitable. some cases of very secure deprivation have had good outcomes provided the child has some social interactions and good aftercare
KOLUCHOVA 1976
reported the case of two twin boys from Czechoslovakia who ere isolated from 18 months until they were 7 years old . afterwards they were looked after by two loving adults and appeared to recover fully . cases like this show that the period identified by bowlby is only sensitive not critical