book CASE LAW Flashcards

1
Q
  1. Florida vs. bostick.
A
  1. Permitted Warrantless sweeps of inner city busses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

County of riverside vs. McLaughlin.

A

Determined that if the detention of a suspect is longer then 48 hours without a hearing. Then the burden of proof shifts to the police to prove reasonableness.
If shorter the burden of proof for reasonableness shifts to the suspect.

48 hours is presumably reasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Terry vs. Ohio

A

A police officer may stop a person for questioning is the officer reasonably suspects that the suspect has committed , is committing , it is about to commit a crime. Officer does not need probably cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tennessee vs garner

A

Fleeing Felon rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mapp vs Ohio.

A

The exclusionary rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Nix vs Williams.

A

Inevitable discovery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cheedle vs BARWELL.

A

Best evidence rule. Notes for court original notes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Arenson vs. Jackson.

A

Best evidence rule. Photocopied notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cleaning blood use what part chlorine bleach to what part water.

A

1 chlorine to

10 water

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Minick vs Mississippi

A

After council is requested by s defendant. Law enforcement must stop questioning and can not start again unless attorney is present or the defendant initiates the conversation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Minnesota vs Murphy.

A

Privations officers do not need to mirandize their clients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Berkemer vs mccarty

A

Miranda is not needed during traffic tickets issuance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Oregon vs elstead

A

Confessions after Miranda are admissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Davis vs United States

A

Clarifying if a suspect says maybe I want a lawyer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

California vs prysock

A

Miranda warnings need not be given in order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. Graham vs. Conner.
A
  1. The federal standard for police use of force. The case established OBJECTIVELY REASONABLE.