Bonhoeffer - Christianity Flashcards

1
Q

Bonhoeffer early life

A

Born 1906. Educated at Tübingen uni, valuing academics highly.
Visited Rome on 18th Birthday - taking with St Peter’s Basilica and on Palm Sunday went to mass; he saw people of all races and ethnicities celebrating this Christian moment all together - the universal Church

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Deutschechristians

A

Nazi Christians who pushed for a Nazified version of the Church (Reichskirche), full of nationalist ideals

Draws attention to how tradition leads to absent minded following a halt in questioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

‘The Church is the Church…’

A

… only when it exists for others’ - Bonhoeffer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Confessing Church

A

Founded by Bonhoeffer in response to Hitler’s founding of the German Evangelical Church in 1934

Hitler removed all non-aryan clergy

The Confessing Church made the Barmen declaration, mostly written by Barth, where they rejected governmental interference in the Church and affirmed the Bible as the source of revelation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Finkenwalde

A

Where Bonhoeffer held an illegal secret seminary - a form of civil disobedience

He introduced seminarians to his method of daily meditating on the Bible - this shows the individuality of religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What music did Bonhoeffer introduce to his seminarians

A

The African American church music he had experience in NYC

Clifford Green remarked on the significance of this that young men trained in rigorous systematic theology ‘encountered for the first time the Social Gospel, the need for moral responsibility in the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Solidarity mean for Bonhoeffer

A

It refers to the purpose of Christian life being about relationship to God by living with and for others - this is what convinced him to return to Germany and get involved in resistance, despite his escape to America.

He thought he would have ‘no right’ to help restore Christianity in Germany post-war unless he shared ‘the trials of this time with my people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What part of the Bible did the Reichskirche try to cut out

A

The Old Testament, to rid any Jewish remnants

Denying Christianity’s roots of persecution with Jesus himself being a Jew

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Religionless Christianity

A

No fluff’ to stop self from being a Christian; a separation from ideology - he thought the Church was an impediment to that

Religion implies we have different labels we apply to ourselves

Bonhoeffer wanted an emphasis on the individual Christian being Christian rather than just associated with the group

He was an inclusivist, but upholds the role of Jesus and doesn’t want to preclude other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Inclusivist

A

No other religions are wrong, but they are just missing out on an important piece of information - Jesus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Exclusivist

A

Only Christianity is right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Costly Discipleship

A

Silence in the face of evil is evil… not to act is to act’ - Bonhoeffer

Asks the question ‘What does Christianity want from me?’ - links to LT; living like a Christian rather than just thinking like one

Bonhoeffer calls Christians who don’t go into harms way ‘self-deluding’ and ‘hypocritical

Dichotomy between private righteousness versus responsible action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Private righteousness

A

The Pharisees who do as they’re told and follow tradition to avoid punishment from God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Responsible action

A

Where you out and go against tradition to make a change and a difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Biblical evidence of Costly Discipleship

A

Garden of Gestheminy, where Jesus asked God if there was any way to avoid the crucifixion, but realised it was his destiny

Analogous to Bonhoeffer, who was offered a chance to escape Nazi jail but declined it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did Finkenwalde ordinands demonstrate costly grace

A

They were required to meditate for hours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Within Bonhoeffer’s Christocentrism, where did he focus most

A

The Sermon on the Mount

This preaches humility and sacrifice

His faith is in Jesus specifically

Putting himself in harms way, akin to Jesus, and dies for sacrifice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did Bonhoeffer call the religion of those who follow traditions blindly

A

Dead religion

Reminiscent of Nietzsche?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What issue arises from Bonhoeffer’s focus on the Sermon on the Mount

A

Do we just want Christianity to be the Sermon on the Mount?

The focus on this preach of humility makes his assassination plan for Hitler inconsistent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Jesus would assassinate Hitler

A

Precedents of war in OT
- Unclear what Jesus thought of this? Is OT still relevant after Jesus?
- Very complicated picture

Liberation Theology - Jesus as a revolutionary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Jesus wouldn’t assassinate Hitler

A

Jesus’ self sacrifice

Love your enemies

Jesus didn’t directly oppose the Romans

‘Turn the other cheek’

‘It is necessary’ that Christians obey their rulers since the rulers are ‘God’s servant for your good’ - Paul in Romans 13

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How did Bonhoeffer adopt some Augustinian ideas

A

He thought we should listen to our conscience and that scripture should be read personally

**Augustinian Antinomianism

Without me you can do nothing’ - Jesus in John 55 - submission to God’s will

23
Q

Was Bonhoeffer scripturally justified to attempt to assassinate Hitler

A

No, he contradicts it

His theology is dependent on individual reasoning and so can be a misrepresentation of what God wants (Hans Breivik) - it becomes highly individualistic

It leads us to an Antinomian Christianity that is so individualistic it could lead to any outcome

24
Q

What is the impact of Bonhoeffer’s theology being inherently anti-authoritarian in an authoritarian world?

A

Christianity is the norm in the West, so you have to say that Christianity is totally wrong to follow Bonhoeffer’s theory

In addition, it inherently has an enemy because he wants us to live as Jesus did; amongst our enemies. This consequently creates lines and divisions to make an ‘us’ and a ‘them’ for his theology

Raises the question as to whether his theology only works in war time

25
What two key things does Bonhoeffer highlight
Urgency of action and obedience to God, rather than religion
26
What does Bonhoeffer’s theology amplify
The battle between good and evil that exists in Christianity **working as individuals though**
27
Criticisms of Bonhoeffer
His theology is: - Divisive - Counter-productive - Undermines the power of joint action, promulgated by the Church Jesus wasn’t necessarily trying to champion the oppressed, but bring them up to a societally accepted level Its political nature makes it become a form of ‘worldly’ Christianity - many Christinas think you have to right in this world but it has little consequence in the LR
28
Karl Barth similarity with Bonhoeffer
Both saw what was happening in Germany and saw the same errors emerging
29
Difference of Barth with Dietricht Bonhoeffer
Bonhoeffer put more power into the hands of individuals, whilst Barth denied the ability of human beings to understand God and what He wants for us Bonhoeffer felt we had to get rid of the Church and religion, returning to a more traditional Christianity where people weren’t sheep and take individual responsibilities Barth felt humans couldn’t be trusted to understand God and His will. He thought the only real answer was to listen and trust what God has told us to do; stop trying to reason
30
Barth’s Neo-Orthodox view
Approaching the Bible with humility and meditating on it in a community of believers can create an encounter with Jesus Bonhoeffer adopted this
31
How does the Neo-Orthodox view protect Bonhoeffer’s theology
He thinks legalism is wrong; the will of God is not the stale set of ancient ethical rules written in the Bible. It is alive in a Christian church community. Each new day and situation needs a renewed attempt to understand the will of God Finkenwalde is where he tried putting this to action
32
‘[The Bible] contains no…
… ethical precept which we may or even can adopt literally’ – Bonhoeffer.
33
Civil disobedience
Bonhoeffer thought that part of a Christian’s responsibility to the state is not only to obey its laws that encourage law and order but also to disobey their leaders if they act against the interests of the state and God’s will. He engaged in civil disobedience by taking part in the confessing Church and the illegal seminary at Finkenwalde; arguably his plot to kill Hitler went beyond ‘civil’ action
34
Evaluation of Civil Disobedience
There are many historical instances where people have done terrible things because they thought they had the will of God on their side (France that massacre of Catholics and then Protestants) Even Nazi soldiers had the slogan ‘God is on our side’ on their belts Paul Hill murdered an abortion doctor and claimed to be inspired by Bonhoeffer George Bush cited Bonhoeffer to justify his war on terror
35
How would Bonhoeffer respond to the evaluation of Civil Disobedience
Acting according to God’s will for B requires that we put aside both our human ethics and our personal desires for it to be a truly selfless act - the injunction of ‘Love thy neighbour’ was thought be B to require selflessness of us This makes his recommendation less susceptible to justifying terrible things The Nazis didn’t put aside their selfish ideas and neither did Bush
36
Response to Bonhoeffer’s rebuttal to the evaluation of Civil Disobedience
It is impossible to truly put aside your own mind; your desires shape your perspective on the world in a deep and inescapable way Harvey Cox claimed Bonhoeffer’s theology is like a Rorschach test; it revealed the theological presuppositions of the reader The fact that such an inconsistent variety of people have drawn inspiration from Bonhoeffer suggests he is just providing an excuse for people to do as they will
37
How do secularists argue against Bonhoeffer
They want a complete separation of Church and State, even rejecting the idea that the Church could act as a check on the state They may argue that the Church is more corruptible due to its lack of democracy ‘The long peace’ is the significant level of peace after the Second World War to present day. Secularists use it to argue that the rise of secular liberal democracy is good and how unnecessary religion is for maintains social order Thus, B’s view that the Church should act as a check on state power is unnecessary today and so relevant no more
38
How does Stanley Hauerwas defend Bonhoeffer from secularism
Says how western democracies practice religious tolerance for pragmatic reasons without concern for religious truth. Pragmatism without truth, leading to indifference and then cynicism. Liberal secular western societies have undermined theological and religious truth which creates a void vulnerable to being filled by totalitarian powers He is saying we lack purpose and guidance without religion and without purpose people don’t realise their freedom is being taken away Arguably Bonhoeffer has a point that the Church can act as a useful moral compass for society to protect against this possibility
39
‘Whoever wants to be my…
… disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me’ - Mark 8:34-35 Suggests costly action is required for true discipleship
40
Critique of costly discipleship
Irrelevant today Bonhoeffer’s emphasis on suffering made more sense contemporarily, resisting Nazi rule We live in times of relative peace and security and thus suffering is not as required
41
Defence of costly discipleship
Jesus called on us to sacrifice like he did and arguably that was the primary meaning of discipleship. Our cross might be different from his but there are still sacrifices we can and should make today to prevent evil like racism/sexism and global issues involving war and climate change.
42
Examples of successful resistance to tyranny using non-violent resistance
**Ghandi’s** liberation of India from the British **MLK** was a Christian who had a different view to B about the effectiveness and morality of violence in civil disobedience Arguably, **Ghandi** and **King’s** method is morally superior and more true to Christian ethics compared to Bonhoeffer’s which allows violence
43
Defence of Bonhoeffer’s violent civil disobedience from non-violent
Jesus’ pacifism ‘worked’ because he was raised from the dead and thereby saved us from our sins MLK’s pacifism ‘worked’ against the evil of racism in America, so B would provably have approved However, it would not have worked against Hitler so B thought that fulfilling God’s will required violence Non-violent resistance works only if the tyrant has a problem with killing peaceful protestors This shows Bonhoeffer’s theology remains relevant because it’s saying you must figure out how to resist evil in your situation and have that it’s God’s will to act on that and that He will forgive you if you’re mistaken. In this Fallen world it is the best moral approach a Christian can hope for and it is what God wants of us - He wants us to act
44
Aquinas on civil disobedience and duty to the state vs God
We can disobey laws if they are bad for us, only if the fallout from the disobeying is not as bad though If the law is opposed to Divine Law e.g idolatry, then Christians mustn’t follow those laws ‘*We ought to obey God rather than man*’ - Acts 5:29 Aquinas’ view is therefore much simpler than Bonhoeffer’s about when civil disobedience is justified and there’s much less risk of it justifying evil acts, being misinterpreted or misapplied
45
Aquinas’ Primary Precepts rejection of Bonhoeffer
‘To live in an orderly society’ is one of Aquinas’ Primary Precepts and thus civil disobedience could be seen to be hindering the ability to follow this precept, so long as the cause it is going against is not destroying this itself
46
Defence of Bonhoeffer from Aquinas’ duty to state vs God criticism
Bonhoeffer mostly agreed with Barth that human reason was corrupted and so cannot be relied upon to know the primary precepts So, Aquinas’ criticism fails due to the lack of validity that the argument it is derived from holds - only faith in God’s revelation in the Bible works
47
‘The finite has no
Capacity for the infinite’ - Karl Barth
48
Aquinas’ defence of his theology from OG sin
Only rational beings can sin - the doctrine of original sin claims that post-lapsarian humans are sinners It follows that we must still be rational to some degree; our reason therefore still inclines us, through synderesis, towards goodness
49
Does Aquinas’ defence of his theology hold up?
Barth still seems correct that our corruption makes our reasoning about God’s existence and morality also corrupted Even if there is natural law, we are unable to follow it reliably as the bad in our nature unfortunate means we cannot rely on the good. Whatever a weak and misled conscience discovers is too unreliable
50
This-worldliness
A concept B used to describe the way in which he thinks Christianity should be less about personal pursuit of salvation and more about ‘*sharing God’s sufferings in the world*’ He initially thought that living a holy life would help him acquire faith, but came to think instead that ‘*only by living completely in this world*’ enables one to have faith This worldliness focuses Christians on the concrete actions and sacrifices they would have to make in this world to stand their ground against evil in the service of God’s will
51
Religionless Christianity
A form of Christianity Bonhoeffer thought should emerge following the ‘*world come of age*’, meaning humanity reached a level of maturity such that it no longer depended on the traditional legalistic form of religion in the past B thought this could be a good opportunity for a new Christianity to assert itself, because it makes irrelevant the theological baggage, rusty swords and cheap grace of traditional religion and enables us to focus on what it means to live like a disciple of Jesus and trying to follow God’s will The success of this defence of a version of Christianity which works in the secular age is vital to the validity and relevance of B’s theology
52
Critique of religionless Christianity
Some argue B has gone too far in making Christianity relevant in modern secular times by stripping Christianity of its doctrinal content in appeasement of secularism
53
How did Nietzsche influence Bonhoeffer
Prompted him to discuss religionless Christianity and this-worldliness Nietzsche thought that the rise of secularism led to the death of God and thus a need to find our own ethic He thought Christianity’s influence on us was to infect us with the idea of ‘sin’ and ‘otherworldliness’ - the idea we could only have purpose through a supernatural thing we could never live up to, thereby undermining our confidence in asserting our own purpose, making us reliant on religion Nietzsche likened Christianity to a bloodsucking parasite The nihilistic void will linger until become fully free of Christianity’s influence on us, telling us we need cosmic purpose in order to have purpose or moral guidance