BioStats- Beehler Flashcards

1
Q

What could you use to find the frequency of a disease in population?

A

Prevalence
Incidence
Attack Rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What would you use to determine how well a test differentiates sick from healthy people?

A

Sensitivity

Specificity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What would you use to determine of those in a population who test as sick or healthy, how many are truly sick or healthy?

A

Predictive value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What would you use to determine impact of a medicine/treatement?

A

Risk reduction/increase

Number-needed-to-treat/harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do you determine prevalence?

A

Number of people with a disease at a specific point in time/ Number of people at risk for the illness at that point in time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the two subtypes of prevalence?

A

Period prevalence- during a period of time

Lifetime prevalence- over the course of a lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A county in Minnesota has a population of 1,500. In 2013, 180 individuals were diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Last year, 30 individuals were diagnosed with it. What was the incidence of type 1 diabetes in this population in 2014?

A

= 30/(1500-180) = 30/1320 = 0.023

The 180 are no longer new, so you need to remove the people who are no longer new

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A county in Minnesota has a population of 1,500. In 2013, 180 individuals were diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Last year, 30 individuals were diagnosed with it. What was the prevalence of type 1 diabetes in this population in 2014?

A

= (180+30)/1500 = 210/1500 = 0.14

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How do you determine incidence?

A

Number of NEW people with disease during a time period/ Number of people at risk for illness during that time period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is attack rate?

A

Type of incidence used when nature of disease is acute & population observed for short period of time (eg outbreaks, specific exposures)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How do you determine attack rate?

A

new cases/ # exposed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is secondary attack rate?

A

new cases/ (# exposed- primary cases)

  • measures person-to-person spread of disease after initial exposure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Within a kindergarten class, 5 of 35 kids develop chicken pox during a 1-week period. In the next two weeks another 10 kids also come down with chicken pox. What are the attack and secondary attack rates of chicken pox in the classroom?

A

Attack = (5+10)/35 = 15/35 = 0.43

Sec. Attack = 10/(35-5) = 10/30 = 0.33

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does duration of illness affect prevalence?

A

Longer duration = higher prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does migration affect prevalence?

A

In-migration (ill = higher prevalence)

Out-migration (well = high prevalence)

Recovery & death = lower prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does prevention affect incidence?

A

Tries to lower incidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Can changes in diagnostic criteria or reporting affect incidence?

A

YES!!!!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When will prevalence be higher than incidence?

A

If disease is long term (like diabetes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What does it mean if prevalence is approximately the same as incidence?

A

Illness is acute (flu)

20
Q

What is sensitivity?

A

The probability that a disease person will be identified correctly by a diagnostic/ screening test

True-positive probability or

True-positive rate

21
Q

How do you determine sensitivity?

A

True positive/ (TP + FN)

22
Q

A group of individuals who were exposed to Lyme disease were screened using a new test developed for early detection. Of the 344 screened, the disease was confirmed in 258. The new test detected 263 cases of Lyme disease, 32 of which were disconfirmed. What is the sensitivity of the new test?

A

= True positives / total # ill = 231/258 = 0.90

23
Q

What is specificity?

A

The probability that a well (non-diseased) person will be identified correctly by a diagnostic/screening test (AKA true-negative probability)

24
Q

How do you determine specificity?

A

TN/ (TN + FP)

25
What does having a high sensitivity mean?
- Errors on the side of over-diagnosing - Identify most or all possible disease cases - Most useful when under-diagnosing may lead to severe consequences (fast developing cancers)
26
What does having a high specificity mean?
- Errors on the side of under-diagnosing - Identify most or all well people - Most useful when over- diagnosing may lead to dangerous, painful, or unnecessary treatment?
27
What happens when you lower your cut off?
Lower specificity Raise sensitivity *double check this
28
What happens when you raise your cut off?
Raise specificity Lower sensitivity *double check this
29
What is predictive value?
Probability that a test will give the correct diagnosis
30
What does the predictive value depend on?
test sensitivity and specificity prevalence of the disease in the population being tested
31
How do you determine positive predictive value?
TP/ (TP + FP)
32
How do you determine negative predictive value?
TN/ (TN + FN)
33
How does high disease prevalence affect the PPV and NPV?
Higher PPV | Lower NPV
34
How does low disease prevalence affect PPV and NPV?
Lower PPV | Higher NPV
35
What is control event rate? How do you determine it?
Proportion of control group participants who have a bad outcome after “treatment” (e.g., placebo or no treatment) For example… If 10 of 30 control group participants become sicker, CER = 10/30 = 0.33 = 33% had adverse outcomes
36
What is experimental event rate? How do you determine it?
Proportion of treatment group participants who have a bad outcome after treatment (e.g., new drug) For example… If 4 of 30 treatment group participants become sicker, EER = 4/30 = 0.13 = 13% had adverse outcomes
37
What is absolute risk?
Absolute risk (aka “risk difference”): difference in risk of developing a disease or undesired outcome after treatment |CER – EER| *look for reduction or increase, focus on relationship between CER and EER
38
If CER > EER.... what happens to absolute risk?
Reduction (ARR) | Higher rate of adverse outcomes in CONTROL group
39
If CER
Increased (ARI) | Higher rate of adverse outcomes in TREATMENT GROUP
40
What is relative risk?
"risk ratio" Proportion of treatment group risk to control group risk EER/CER
41
After participating in an RCT of a new cancer drug, 10 of 30 control group participants become sicker and 4 of 30 treatment group participants become sicker. Did the new treatment reduce or increase absolute risk? By how much?
CER – EER = 10/30 – 4/30 = .33 - .13 = .20 = | 20% reduction
42
After participating in an RCT of a new cancer drug, 10 of 30 control group participants become sicker and 4 of 30 treatment group participants become sicker. Did the new treatment reduce or increase the risk of illness relative to the control group? By how much
1 – RR = 1 – EER/CER = 1 - 13/.33 = 1 - .39 = .61 = | 61% reduction
43
Number needed to treat
Number of patients who need to be treated to get 1 additional patient a favorable outcome 1/ARR
44
Number needed to harm
Number of patients who, if they were treated, would result in 1 additional patient being harmed NNH = 1/ARI
45
How would you interpret NNT = 5?
For every 5 people treated, 1 more person would respond to the drug
46
How would you interpret NNH =3?
If 3 were treated, 1 more person would not respond compared to the control group