Aurangzeb's policies + more --> decline of empire Flashcards
1
Q
How did Aurangzeb’s policies contribute to the decline of the Mughal Empire?
A
- Aurangzeb was unpopular due to his strict policies against non-Muslims.
- He reimposed Jiziya, demolished Hindu temples, and adopted a harsh attitude toward Sikhs.
- He banned activities like painting, music, gambling, and dance.
- While he tried to ban practices like Suttee, his heavy taxes to fund military campaigns and luxurious projects drained the treasury.
- These measures made him unpopular and created challenges for his successors.
2
Q
How did the lack of a law of succession impact the Mughal Empire?
A
- Mughal rulers had no fixed law of succession, leading to in-fighting among princes after an emperor’s death.
- Aurangzeb divided the empire among his sons, but fighting ensued.
- Prince Muazzam became emperor but ruled weakly.
- Wars of succession became a tradition, wasting resources and dividing the army, further weakening the empire.
3
Q
What invasions followed Aurangzeb’s death, and how did they affect the Mughal Empire?
A
- Aurangzeb’s death left a weakened empire under inefficient rulers.
- Nadir Shah invaded in 1738-39, looting Delhi and taking treasures like the Peacock Throne.
- Afghan leader Ahmed Shah Abdali followed, attacking Mughal territories between 1748 and 1767, plundering wealth, and defeating the Marathas.
- These invasions further destabilized the empire.
4
Q
How did the British East India Company contribute to the decline of the Mughal Empire?
A
- The British arrived in 1600 AD for trade, which initially benefited Indians.
- Over time, they monopolized trade, using profits to develop advanced weapons.
- Benefiting from the Industrial Revolution, they had superior military skills and gradually established armies to control territories previously under Mughal rule.
5
Q
How did the rise of Maratha power contribute to the Mughal Empire’s decline?
A
- The Maratha Empire, founded by Shivaji in the 1670s, became a dominant power by the 18th century.
- They defeated the Mughals near Delhi in 1737 and filled the power vacuum created by the declining empire.
- Aurangzeb’s 25-year campaign in the Deccan to defeat the Marathas drained the treasury, weakening the Mughals further.
6
Q
How did the weak successors of Aurangzeb contribute to the Mughal Empire’s decline?
A
- Aurangzeb’s successors led extravagant lifestyles, neglected state affairs, and became morally corrupt.
- They failed to defend or consolidate the empire, becoming complacent due to the empire’s past success.
- This neglect left the empire vulnerable to internal and external threats, hastening its decline.
7
Q
Was Aurangzeb solely responsible for the decline of the Mughal Empire?
A
- To conclude, Aurangzeb’s policies significantly weakened the empire, making it difficult for his successors to recover.
- However, other factors like the absence of a law of succession, invasions, British intervention, the rise of the Marathas, and weak successors also played crucial roles in the empire’s decline.