Attitudes & Behaviour II Flashcards
1
Q
KEY TERM ACRONYMS
A
- attitudes = A
- theory of reasoned action = TRA
- theory of planned behaviour = TPB
- behavioural intentions = BI
- perceived behavioural control = PBC
- subjective norms = SN
- implementation intentions = II
- motivation/opportunity as determinants of behaviour = MODE model
2
Q
THEORY OF REASONED ACTION (TRA)
A
- attitude component = expectancy/value
- behavioural intentions = do you intend to x?
- subjective norm = what do others think? normative beliefs + motivation to comply
3
Q
FISHBRIN & AZJEN (1975)
A
- TRA
- attitude toward the beh + subjective norm -> beh intention -> behaviour
4
Q
TRA: EVALUATION
A
- good at predicting beh BUT…
- “can” factor was missing (aka. does person feel they CAN perform beh)
- AKA. perceived behavioural control (PBC)
5
Q
AZJEN (1991)
A
- theory of planned behaviour (TPB)
- incorporated perceived behavioural control (PBC)
- PBCs determined by control beliefs
- PBC influences beh via affecting beh intentions (BI) and direct behaviour
6
Q
AZJEN & MADDEN (1986)
A
- theory of planned behaviour (TPB)
- attitude toward beh + subjective norm + perceived beh control -> behavioural intention -> beh
7
Q
TPB: COMPARISON
A
- adding PBC = improvement > TRA
- TRA/TPB studies; support found for both
ALBARRACIN ET AL (2001) - meta-analysis (96 studies)
- TRA; condom use
AMITAGE & CONNOR (2001) - meta-analysis (185 studies)
- TPB; stopping smoking
- blood donation
- public transport
8
Q
ALBARRACIN ET AL (2001)
A
- future condom use beh = STATSIG related to BI to use condoms (r = .45)
- B1 predicted via As (r = .58)/SNs (r = .39)
- As towards condom use predicted by beh beliefs (r = .56)
- SNs predicted by normative beliefs (r = .46)
- SO: TRA variables did well in helping beh prediction
9
Q
ARMITAGE & CONNER (2001)
A
- suggests TPB = good intention/beh predictor
- works better for self-reported > observed beh
- showed that PBC independently predicted intentions/beh in a wide domain number
10
Q
TPB: EVALUATION
A
- both meta-analyses = good evidence of effectiveness in predicting thoughtful beh BUT…
1. ARE SOME BELIEFS MORE IMPORTANT THAN OTHERS?
2. WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT IN BI PREDICTION: A/SN?
11
Q
TPB: ARE SOME TYPES OF BELIEF MORE IMPORTANT THAN OTHERS?
A
- liked VS disliked outcomes
- negative outcomes = ^ important in predicting speeding beh
- positive outcomes = ^ important in predicting smoking initiation (LAWTON ET AL (2007)
- material costs/benefits to the self; action consequences for feelings/well-being (instrumental VS emotional beliefs)
12
Q
INSTRUMENTAL VS EMOTIONAL BELIEFS
A
- action = eating fruits
- instrumental outcomes = better energy levels/weight control/cardiovascular health
- emotional outcomes = pride/vitality feelings
- important distinction when understanding risky beh; negative emotional beliefs = v important
13
Q
WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT IN PREDICTING BI: A/SN?
A
- usually BI better predicted by A > SN BUT not always
- sometimes difs in whether people/situations emphasise personal (what I think) VS collective (what OTHERS who matter think) beliefs
14
Q
TRAFIMOV & FINLAY (1996)
A
- students completed measures of A/SN/BI towards 30 items ie. paying bills on time/eating begs regularly
- 80% = BIs better predicted by A > SN
- 20% = reversed pattern
15
Q
YBARRA & TRAFIMOW (1998)
A
- do we think more in terms of private VS collective self?
- pps thought about private VS collective-self cognitions to see if results = affected
- private self-cognition = “I am funny”
- collective self-cognition = “my family thinks that I am funny”