attachments - everything Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what are Schaffer’s stages of attachments

A

asocial, indiscriminate, specific and multiple

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the asocial stage

A
  • first few weeks
  • babies respond in the same way to humans and objects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is indiscriminate attachment

A
  • 2-6 months
  • preference for familiar people
  • no stranger/separation anxiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is specific attachment

A
  • 7 months
  • one primary attachment figure
  • 65% with mother, 3% with father (27% with both)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is multiple attachment

A
  • from 8 months +
  • by 12 months most babies have multiple attachments e.g 75% have attachment with fathers by 18 months
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

who found the stages of attachment

A

Schaffer and Emerson (1964)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was Schaffer and Emersons procedure

A

Longitudinal study,

60 Glaswegian babies observed at home (largely) by mothers,

recorded infants separation distress and stranger anxiety in diary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Schaffer and Emerson find

A

stages of attachment

sensitive responsiveness - attachment was to caregiver who responded appropriately to signals, not the one who fed them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

2 limitations for Schaffer and Emerson

A
  • difficult to asses multiple attachments (infant distress doesn’t necessarily signify attachment)
  • hard to study asocial babies (poor coordination so may just seem asocial)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2 strengths for Schaffer and Emerson

A
  • high external validity (no demand characteristics as babies, and parents did observing so behaviour was natural)
  • longitudinal/repeated measures (no participant variables, high internal validity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

who are the two main psychologists for role of the father

A

Grossman and Field

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was Grossmans procedure

A

Longitudinal study following 44 families from infancy to 16 years old. Assessed quality of attachments at 6, 10, 16

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were Grossmans findings

A

Fathers’ play sensitivity is a better predictor of the child’s long-term attachment representation than the early infant–father security of attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

other key ideas for role of the father

A

Infant-mother attachment is more crucial in later teen attachments than infant-father attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did field find

A

Fathers can be primary caregivers.

Caregiver-infant interactions filmed and compared.

PCG Fathers adopt behaviours typical of mothers. E.g. More time smiling and holding

Key to attachment is responsiveness of adult (e.g. smiling) not gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

limitations for role of father - McCallum and Gollombok)

A
  • no distinct role, children without fathers are no different so secondary attachment may be unimportant
17
Q

limitation for role of father - biology

A
  • hormones may predispose women to be nurturing thus making mothers more likely to be primary attachment figures
18
Q

limitation for role of the father - Schaffer and Emerson

A

found that gender and learning were unimportant in forming attachment, responsiveness to the child’s needs was the most important

19
Q

strength for role of the father

A
  • economic implications, Fathers have important (but different) role so may want to stay home longer (Grossman). Mothers may feel freer to return to work and leave fathers at home
20
Q

what is interactional synchrony

A
  • baby and mother mirror actions and emotions at the same time (coordinated)
  • Meltzoff and Moore showed this at two weeks old
  • higher synchrony linked to better quality attachment (Isabella et al)
21
Q

what is reciprocity

A
  • caregiver and infant respond to each other’s signals, like a conversation, 3+ months
  • each elicits a response from each other
22
Q

key study for caregiver-infant interactions

A

Meltzoff and Moore (1977)

23
Q

What was Meltzoff and Moores procedure

A

Adult displayed one of three facial expressions, e.g. tongue protrusion. Child and adult filmed from multiple angles. Watched in slow motion

24
Q

What were Meltzoff and Moores findings

A

Clear association between expression and action of the child

25
Q

3 limitations for Meltzoff and Moore

A
  • hard to investigate infant behaviour (practical issues e.g naps and also can’t tell if behaviour has meaning)
  • no purpose concluded (Feldman)
  • socially sensitive (implications for mothers returning to work – should someone stay at home to ensure good reciprocity)
26
Q

2 strengths for Meltzoff and Moore

A
  • well controlled procedures (filmed in slow mo from multiple angles, good validly)
  • value to society (could be used to improve mother-infant interactions in at risk groups)
27
Q

What are the two Animal studies in attachments

A

Lorenz (1952) and Harlow (1958)

28
Q

What was Lorenz’s procedure

A

12 goose eggs, six saw mother within hours
of hatching, six hatched in incubator and saw Lorenz

29
Q

What was Lorenz’s findings

A

goslings followed whichever was the first moving object they saw within 12-18 hours (imprinting). First bond affected mating preferences in later life (sexual imprinting). This was permanent / irreversible

30
Q

What was Lorenz’s conclusion

A

imprinting occurs in critical period, no attachment if outside that time

31
Q

2 limitations for Lorenz

A
  • generalising from birds to humans is doubtful (attachment systems different in mammals
  • Guiton et al, disproves sexual imprinting being permanent, chickens changed preferences
32
Q

supporting evidence for Lorenz

A

Guiton et al found chicks imprinted on washing up gloves (first large moving thing they saw)

33
Q

What was Harlow’s procedure

A

16 Rhesus monkeys raised with ‘surrogate mothers’. Provides food or cloth-covered. Observed for 165 days. Also exposed to fearful stimulus

34
Q

What did Harlow find

A

Infants preferred cloth-covered mother to wire one with milk. Critical period of 90 days, there were long term effects on later relationships and behaviour if missed, e.g. violent and issues mating

35
Q

What was Harlows conclusion

A

contact comfort’ more important than food in attachment

36
Q

3 limitations for Harlow

A
  • ethical issues (suffering of infant monkeys bad as they’re human like )
  • generalisation (Better than geese but human communication influences attachment)
  • lacking internal validity (in early experiments faces on monkeys were different)
37
Q

strengths for Harlow

A
  • real life application (Showed importance of attachment (e.g. abuse)