Attachment: Explanations Of Attachment - Learning Theory Flashcards
What is the learning theory
- set of theories from the behaviourist approach to psychology, emphasises the role of learning in the acquisition of behaviour
What did dollard and miller propose about caregiver infant attachment
- can be explained by the learning theory
- their approach is referred to as a ‘cupboard love’ as it emphasises the importance of of the caregiver as a provider of food
Outline the role of classical conditioning in caregiver infant attachments
- involves learning to associate two stimuli together
- in attachment, food is the unconditioned stimulus, being fed gives us pleasure, this is unconditioned response
- a caregiver is initially a neutral stimulus
- being associated with food turns caregiver into a conditioned stimulus
Outline the role of operant conditioning in caregiver infant attachments
- involves learning to repeat behaviour, or not, depending on its consequences
- operant conditioning can explain why babies cry for comfort - crying leads to a response from the caregiver (like feeding)
- this reinforces the behaviour of crying
- the caregiver also receives negative reinforcement because the crying stops
Outline attachment as a ‘secondary drive’ according to the learning theory of attachment
- hunger is a primary drive - it is innate and a ‘biological motivator;’
- sears et al - suggested that, by providing food, the primary drive of hunger becomes generalised to the caregiver
What are the three evaluation points for the learning theory as an explanation of attachment
- counter evidence form animal research
- counter evidence form human research
- ignores other factors associated with forming attachments
Outline ‘counter evidence form animal research’ as an evaluation point for the learning theory as an explanation for attachment
- animal studies show young animals do not necessarily attach (or imprint) on those who feed them
- Harlows monkeys attached to a cloth mother as opposed to the wire mother that fed them
Outline ‘counter evidence form human research’ as an evaluation point for the learning theory as an explanation for attachment
- feeding does not appear to be an important factor in humans
- Schaffer and Emerson - many babies developed a primary attachment to their biological mother even those other carers did most of the feeding
- implies there is not unconditioned stimulus/ primary drive involved
Outline ‘ignores other factors associated with forming attachments’ as an evaluation point for the learning theory as an explanation for attachment
- research suggests the quality of attachment is associated with factors like developing reciprocity and good Interactional synchrony
- also, best quality attachments are with sensitive carers
- if attachment developed primarily as a result of feeding, these interactions would be useless