Memory: Coding Capacity And Duration Of Memory Flashcards
Which psychologist conducted research into ‘coding’
Baddeley
Outline Baddeleys study into the coding of memory
- acoustically similar, acoustically dissimilar, semantically similar, semantically dissimilar
- ppts asked to recall a list of words in the correct order
- if recalled immediately after (STM) - ppts worse with acoustically similar
- 20 mins later (LTM) ppts worse with semantically similar
What does Baddeley’s research on coding of memory suggest
Information is coded semantically in the LTM
Outline one limitation of baddeleys study on the coding of memory
- Artificial stimuli
- Word lists had no meaning to ppts
- So not necessarily generalisable
- When processing more meaningful info people may use semantic coding even for STM tasks
What two psychologists conducted research on the capacity of memory
- Jacobs - digit span
- Miller - span of memory and Chunking
Outline Jacobs research on digit span
- Researcher gives 4 digits + ppt have to recall these in the correct order
- If correct, researchers, give 5 digits etc
- This is done until ppts cannot record digits correctly = their digit span
- mean digit span - 9.3 items
- mean letter span - 7.3 items
Outline millers research into ‘span of memory and chunking’
- noted things come in 7’s - weeks, deadly sins etc
- suggests span/capacity of STM = 7 items (+/-2)
- miller also noted, people can recall 5 words as well as they can recall 5 letters - this is done by chunking
What is one limitation of jacobs study into digit span
- lacks validity
- long time ago, when psychology often lacked control of confounding variables
- some pots may have been distracted when being tested
Outline one limitation of millers research into chunking
- may have overestimated capacity of STM
- Cowan - reviewed research and found capacity of STM was around 4 chunks
What two researchers conducted studies on the duration of memory
Peterson and Peterson - duration of STM
Bahrick et al - duration of LTM
Outline Peterson + Peterson study on the duration of STM
- 24 undergraduate students in 8 trials
- on each trial, student given a consonant syllable (trigram) and a 3 digit number
- students had to count backwards from number until told to stop to prevent mental rehearsal
- Told to stop at a different time on each trial - this is known as retention interval
- found STM had a very short duration
Outline Bahrick et als study on the duration of LTM
- studied 392 ppts from Ohio (17-74)
- high school yearbooks obtained
- recall tested 2 ways: photo recognition (from 50 photos) and free recall (ppts recalled names)
Outline the results of Bahrick et als study on the duration of LTM
- ppts tested within 15 yrs of graduation = 90% accurate in photo recognition and 60% accurate in free recall
- after 48 yrs = recall declined to 70% for photo recognition
- shows LTM can last a very long time indeed
Outline a limitation of Peterson + Peterson study into the duration of memory
- meaningless stimuli
- memorising consonant syllables is not reflective of real life STM recall tasks
- so this study may lack external validity
Outline a strength of Bahrick et als study into the duration of LTM
- higher external validity
-real life meaningful memories were studied - when studies on LTM have been conducted on meaningless stimuli, recall rates much lower (shepherd)
- however,confounding variables are not controlled, I.e. ppts may look at yearbook every day