Attachment - Bowlby's theory Flashcards
what is bowlby’s theory
- 1988 rejected learning theory
- proposed an evolutionary explanation
- attachment was an innate system that gives survival advantages
what is monotrophy
- child’s attachment to one particular caregiver
- this attachment was different and the most important
- called the figure a ‘mother’ but it didn’t need to be the biological mother or a female
why did Bowlby believe that the more time we spent with our primary attachment figure is better
Law of continuity
- the more constant and predictable a child’s care the better the quality of their attachment
Law of accumulated separation
- effects of every separation from the mother add up
what are social releasers
- babies are born with a set of innate cute behaviours - smiling, cooing, gripping
- activate social interaction and an adult attaches to the baby
- attachment is a reciprocal process
- baby and mother are hard-wired to attach
what did Bowlby identify as the critical period
- 6 months
- more of a sensitive period than a critical one
- maximally sensitive at 6 months and can extend up to 2 years
what is the internal working model
- mental representations of the world
- affects our future relationships because it carries our perception of what relationships are like
what are the strengths of Bowlby’s theory
Bailey (2017) - supports internal working model
- assessed attachment in 99 mothers and 1 year old babies
- measured the mothers’ attachment to their own primary attachment figures
- assessed attachment quality with babies
- mothers with poor attachment figures more likely to have poorly attached babies
Brazelton (1975) - supports social releasers
- observed babies trigger interactions with adults using social releasers
- researchers told babies’ primary attachment figures to ignore the social releasers
- babies became more distressed, curled up and lay motionless
- social releasers have an important role in attachment development
What are the limitations of Bowlby’s theory -
Schaffer and Emerson (1964) challenge monotropy
- significant minority formed multiple attachments at once
- first attachment has an influence in later life - it may mean its stronger but not different