Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

What is reciprocity

A

How two people interact
- both the baby and the caregiver respond to each other’s signals and each elicits a response from the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is interactional synchrony

A

When the baby and caregiver reflect both the action and emotions of the other and do this in co-ordination with each other
- same action at the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are stages of attachment

A

A sequence of qualitatively different behaviours linked to specific ages
- all babies go through each stage at different times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is multiple attachments

A

Attachments to two or more people. Most babies appear to develop multiple attachments once they have formed one strong attachment with a caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the father in attachment

A

The father is anyone who has taken the role of the main male caregiver
- not always the biological father

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are animal studies in attachment

A

Studies carried out on non-human animal species

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why are animal studies used in psychology

A
  • ethical reasons
  • practical reasons: breed and age faster
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the learning theory

A

Behaviorist approach
- emphasise the role of learning by watching others
- classical and operant conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is monotropic

A

A term used to describe Bowlby’s theory
- one particular attachment is different from all others and of central importance to a child’s development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the critical period

A

The time within which an attachment must form if it is to form ata ll
- ‘sensitive period’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the internal working model

A

Our mental representations of the world
- the representation we have of our relationship to our primary caregiver
- effects how we see future relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is secure attachment

A

The most desirable attachment type, associated with psychologically healthy outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is insecure-avoidant attachment

A

Attachment type characterised by low anxiety but weak attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is insecure-resistant attachment

A

Attachment type characterised by strong attachment and high anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are cultural variation

A

Culture - norms and values that exist within any group of people
- the differences in norms and values that exist between people in different groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is maternal deprivation

A

The emotional and intellectual consequences of separation between a child and their mother
- continuous care from a mother is essential for normal psychological development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are orphan studies

A

Concern children placed in care because their parents cannot look after them
- parents are dead or have been abandoned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is institutionalization

A

The effects of living in an institutional setting
- hospital, orphanage
- often very little emotional care provided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are childhood relationships

A

Affiliations with other people in childhood
- friends, classmates, teachers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are adult relationships

A

Relationships the child goes on to have later on in life
- friendships and working relationships
- romantic partners, children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the alert phase in reciprocity

A

When babies signal they are ready for some interaction
- making eye contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How often to mothers pick up on alert phases

A

2/3 of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Which psychologists studied how often mothers pick up on alert phases

A

Feldman and Edelman
- 2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What other factors effect a mothers ability to pick up on alert phases

A
  • skill of mother
  • external factors: stress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Who studied the other factors that effect a mothers ability to pick up on alert phases
Finegood et al - 2016
26
What happens to alert phases after around 3 months
- interactions become more frequent - both pay close attention to each other’s verbal signals and facial expressions
27
What is active involvement in reciprocity
The babies as well as the caregiver takes an active role in initiating interactions - seen to take turns
28
Who studied active involvement in reciprocity
Brazelton et al - 1975
29
Who defined interactional synchrony
Feldman - 2007
30
Who studied when interactional synchrony begins
Meltzoff and Moore - 1977
31
When did M&M suggest interactional synchrony begins
2 weeks
32
What study did Maltzoff and Moore complete
- interactional synchrony - caregiver performed one of three facial expressions and one of three gestures - baby was more likely to mirror caregiver than chance would predict - interactions were filmed - there was a significant association
33
What study did Isabella et al (1989) complete to show the importance of interactional synchrony
- observation - 30 mothers and babies - assessed degree of synchrony - assessed quality of mother-baby attachment - high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality mother-baby attachments
34
What are the four stages of attachment
- asocial stage - indiscriminate attachment - specific attachment - multiple attachments
35
Time frame of asocial stage
First few weeks
36
Time frame of indiscriminate attachment
2-7 months
37
Time frame of specific attachment
7-10 months
38
Time frame of multiple attachments
10+ months
39
What happens in the asocial stage of attachment
- can’t tell people apart - preference to humans over non-humans
40
Who studied the different stages of attachment
Shaffer and Emerson - 1964
41
What happens during the indiscriminate stage of attachment
- recognise and prefer company of familiar people - accept cuddles and comfort from any person - do not show separation or stranger anxiety
42
What happens in the specific stage of attachment
- attached towards one particular person - formed a specific attachment to their primary attachment figure - show stranger and separation anxiety
43
What happens during the multiple attachment stage of attachment
- start to form secondary attachments - 29% of children form one within a mont of forming a primary attachment - majority of babies have formed multiple attachments but 1
44
What was the procedure into S&E study of attachment
- 60 working class babies from Glasgow - logitudinal study - visited once a month for 18 months - asked mothers about babies when faced with separation and stranger anxiety
45
What were the findings of S&E study
Four attachment stages - asocial stage - indiscriminate attachment - specific attachment - multiple attachments
46
What % of babies attached to their father first in S&E study
3%
47
What % of babies attached to their mum and dad in S&E study
27%
48
What % of babies formed an attachment with their dad by 18 months - S&E
75%
49
Who did studies into the role of the father in attachment
- Grossmann et al (2002) - Field (1978)
50
What study did Grossmann complete
- longitudinal study - babies attachments were studied into their teens - looked at both parents behaviours and its relationship to the quality of the babies attachment later on
51
What were the findings of Grossmann’s study - role of father
- quality of attachment with mother was related to attachments in later life - quality of fathers play with babies is related to attachment in later life
52
Conclusion of Grossmann’s study - role of father
Father plays a different role to the mother in attachments in later life
53
What does a babies relationship with their primary attachment figure do to later relationships
Forms a basis of all later close emotional relationships
54
What was the procedure of Field’s study - role of father
- filmed 4 month old babies - face to face interactions with primary caregiving mothers, fathers and secondary caregiving fathers - pc f spent more time smiling, imitating and holding babies than sc f
55
What are the findings of Field’s study - role of father
- fathers have the potential to be more emotion-focused primary attachment figures - can provide close emotional attachment but maybe only when a primary caregiver
56
When did Lorenz complete his animal study
1952
57
What was Lorenz’s study on
Imprinting
58
Lorenz’s procedure - imprinting
- randomly divided a clutch of goose eggs - half were hatched with their mother in their natural habitat - half were hatched in an incubator with Lorenz being the first thing they saw
59
Findings of Lorenz’s study
- experimental group followed Lorenz everywhere - control group followed mother everywhere - when mixed the babies continued to follow who they saw first
60
What is imprinting
When a baby bird follows and attaches to the first moving object they see
61
What happens if imprinting doesn’t occur
Chicks will not attach themselves to a mother figure
62
What is sexual imprinting
An animal displays a preference to the animal they imprinted on - display courtship behaviours towards them
63
When did Harlow complete his animal study
1958
64
What was Harlow studying
The importance of contact comfort, maternal deprivation
65
Hallow’s procedure - contact comfort
- 16 baby monkeys - two wire model mothers - one condition milk was given by a plane wire mother - other condition milk was dispensed by a cloth covered mother
66
Findings of Harlow’s study - contact comfort
- monkeys cuddles cloth-covered mothers in preference to plain-wire other - sought comfort with cloth mother when frightened - contact comfort was of more importance than food
67
What happened when Harlow looked at the monkeys in later life - maternal deprivation
- plain-wire monkeys were the most dysfunctional - cloth-covered monkeys did not develop normal social skills - more aggressive - less sociable - bred less - mothers neglected and attacked their children
68
What is the critical period of monkeys
90 days
69
Who said infant attachment can be explained with the learning theory
Dollard & Miller - 1950
70
What did Dollard and Millar emphasise
The importance of the attachment figure as a provider of food - cupboard love
71
What are the stages of classical conditioning in the learning theory of attachment
Food - UCS Pleasure - UCR Mother - NS NS -> CS Mother = CS Pleasure = CR
72
How is operant conditioning used to explain the learning theory of attachment
- baby cries for comfort - caregiver responds - crying reinforced - two way process - caregiver receives negative reinforcement
73
What is a primary drive
An innate, biological motivator
74
Example of a primary drive
Hunger
75
What is a secondary drive
Learned by association between the caregiver and the satisfaction of a primary drive
76
Example of a secondary drive
Attachment
77
Who studied the secondary drive
Sears et al - 1957
78
When did Bowlby complete his study
1988
79
What did Bowlby say about the learning theory to explain attachment
If it were true a two year old would take to whoever fed them. This is not the case
80
What were the two principles Bowlby used to explain monotropy
- law of continuity - law of accumulation separation
81
Law of continuity - monotropy
The more constant and predictable a child’s care, the better the quality of their attachment
82
Law of accumulated separation - monotropy
The effects of every separation from the mother add up - better to have no separation
83
What are social releases
Set of innate ‘cute’ behaviours
84
Examples of social releasers
- smiling - cooing - gripping
85
What is the purpose of social releasers
Activate adult social interaction
86
What is the critical period of babies to form attachments - Bowlby
6 months - 2 years
87
What does the internal working model do to attachments later on
- future relationships - how they parent themselves
88
Who designed the strange situation study
Ainsworth & Bell - 1970
89
What was the aim of the strange situation
To observe key attachment behaviours as a means of assessing the quality of a baby’s attachment to a caregiver
90
What was the procedure for the strange situation
- controlled observation - measuring security of attachment a baby displays towards a caregiver - two-way mirror - lab setting - researcher judged of 5 behaviours - 7 steps each lasting 3 minutes
91
What were the behaviours used to judge attachment in the SS
- proximity seeking - exploration and secure-base behaviour - stranger anxiety - separation anxiety - response to reunion
92
What were the 7 steps of the SS
- baby is encouraged to explore - stranger enters, talks to mother and approaches baby - caregiver leaves baby and stranger alone - caregiver returns and stranger leaves - caregiver leaves baby alone - stranger returns - caregiver returns
93
What do each stage of the SS test
- exploration and secure base - stranger anxiety - separation and stranger anxiety - reunion behaviour and exploration/secure base - separation anxiety - stranger anxiety - reunion behaviour
94
What were the finding of the SS
Three attachment types - secure attachment - insecure-avoidant attachment - insecure-resistant attachment
95
Characteristics of secure attachment
- explore happily - regularly go back to their caregiver - show moderate separation and stranger anxiety - require and accept comfort
96
% of babies with secure attachment type
60-75%
97
% of babies with secure attachment type - England
60-75%
98
Characteristics of insecure-avoidant attachment type
- explore freely - do not seek proximity or show secure base behaviour - little or no reaction when caregiver leaves (separation anxiety) - little stranger anxiety - little effort or even avoid making contact
99
% of babies with insecure-avoidant attachment type - England
20-25%
100
Characteristics of insecure-resistant attachment types
- seek greater proximity than others - explore less - high levels of stranger and separation anxiety
101
% of babies with insecure-resistant attachment types - England
3%
102
Psychologists who have conducted studies into cultural variations in attachment
Van IJzendoorn & Kroonenberg - 1988 Simonelli - 2014 Jin - 2012
103
Procedure of VI & K study on cultural variation
- looked at 32 studies on attachment - across 8 countries - 1990 children - used meta analysis
104
What countries did VI & K look at studies from
- Great Britain - Netherlands - China - Japan - Israel - USA - Sweden - Germany
105
Findings of VI & K study - cultural variations of attachment
- wide variation - secure attachment highest in all countries (75% in GB, 50% in China) - IR attachment same as Ainsworth’s study in individualist cultures - different in collectivist cultures (rates above 25%) - variations between results of studies **within** the same country were 150% higher than **between** countries
106
Where did Simonelli conduct her study
Italy
107
Where did Jin conduct his study
Korea
108
Procedure of Simonelli’s study - cultural variations
- 76 babies aged 12 months - SS
109
Findings of Simonelli’s study - cultural variations
- 50% secure - 36% IA - more mothers leaving babies to go work
110
Conclusion of Simonelli’s study - cultural variations
Patterns of attachment types are not static but vary in a line with cultural change
111
Procedure of Jin’s study - cultural variation
- strange situation - 87 babies
112
Findings of Jin’s study - cultural variation
- proportions of insecure and secure babies similar to the SS - most insecure were insecure-resistant - only one insecure-avoidant
113
Explanation for Jin’s findings - cultural variation
Child rearing style
114
Conclusion for the studies done into cultural norms in attachment
- secure attachment is the norm - attachment is innate and universal - cultural practices have an influence on attachment type
115
What was Bowlby looking at in his 44 thief study
Is there a link between affection less psychopathy and maternal deprivation
116
What is affectionless psychopathy
Characterised as a lack of affection, lack of guild about their actions and lack of empathy for their victims
117
Procedure of Bowlby’s study into maternal deprivation
- 44 thieves accused of stealing - interviewed for signs of emotionless psychopathy - families interviews to see if thieves had prolonged early separations from their mothers - compared against a control group of 44 non-thieves
118
Findings of Bowlby’s study - maternal deprivation
- 14/44 thieves were affectionless psychopaths - 12/14 had experienced prolonged separation from mother - 3/30 thieves experienced prolonged separation - 2/44 non-thieves experienced prolonged separation
119
Conclusion of Bowlby’s study - maternal deprivation
Prolonged early separation caused affectionless psychopaths
120
What effects did maternal deprivation have on development
- intellectual - emotional
121
Example of intellectual development being effected by maternal deprivation
Goldfarb (1947) - Lowe IQ in children who remained institutionalized compared to being fostered
122
What does it mean for someone with affectionless psychopathy later on in life
- prevents a person from developing fulfilling relationships - associated with criminality
123
Evaluation points for caregiver-infant interactions
- filmed observations - difficulty observing babies - developmental importance - practical values versus ethics
124
PEEL for filmed observation - caregiver infant interactions
- strength - interactions are usually filmed in a lab - other activity can be controlled - observations can be recorded and analyzed later - unlikely to miss seeing key behaviours - inter observer reliability - babies do not know they are being watch - no demand characteristics - good reliability and validity
125
PEEL for difficulty observing babies - caregiver infant interactions
- limitation - hard to interpret baby’s behaviour - babies lack co-ordination - most of their bodies are almost immobile - small movements and changes in expressions - difficult to be sure - hard to determine what is taking place from the baby’s perspective - may be random or triggered - cannot be certain that the behaviour seen have a special meaning
126
PEEL for developmental importance - infant caregiver interactions
- limitation - simply observing a behaviour doesn’t tell us its developmental importance - Feldman showed that synchrony gives a name to patterns of observable behaviour - can be reliably observed - may not be useful in understanding child development as it doesn’t tell us the purpose of the behaviour - cannot be certain from observational research alone that reciprocity and synchrony are important in development COUNTERPOINT - evidence that early interactions are important - Isabella found that achievement of interactional synchrony predicted the development of good quality attachment - interactions are probably important in development
127
PEEL for practical values versus ethics - caregiver infant interactions
- strength/limitation - practical applications in parenting skills training - found PCIT improved interactional synchrony in 20 low income mothers and their pre-school children - socially sensitive - used to argue that when a mom goes back to work it can risk damaging the baby’s development
128
Evaluation points for Schaffer’s stages of attachment
- good external validity - poor evidence for the asocial stage - real world application - generalizability
129
PEEL for good external validity - stages of attachment
- strength - good external validity - observations were made by parents during normal activities - if researchers were there could have distracted babies or made them anxious - highly likely the pps behaved naturally COUNTERPOINT - issues with the mother being the observer - unlikely to be objective - biased - may have not recognized certain behaviours - misinterpreted or misremembered behaviours - even if babies behaved naturally they may not have been accurately recorded
130
PEEL for poor evidence for the asocial stage - stages of attachment
- limitation - validity of the measures they used to assess attachment in the asocial stage - young babies have poor mobility and coordination - may display actions in hard to observe ways - difficult for mothers to observe - babies may be social but due to flawed methods appear asocial
131
PEEL for real world application - stages of attachment
- strength - practical application in day care - in asocial and indiscriminate stages day care is likely to be straightforward - babies can be comforted by any skilled adult - day care may be problematic during the specific attachment stage - parents can plan when they use day care
132
PEEL for generalizability - stages of attachment
- limitation - based their stages on large scale studies - only looks at one sample - had unique features - cultural and historical context - collectivist cultures have multiple attachments from a young age as the norm
133
Evaluation points for the role of the father
- confusion over research questions - conflicting evidence - real world application - bias in the research
134
PEEL for confusion over research questions - role of the father
- limitation - lack of clarity over the question being asked - the role of the father is much more complicated than it sounds - some want to know the role as a primary caregiver and others the secondary caregiver - primary = can take on the role of the mother - secondary = behave differently to mothers and have distinct roles - difficult to give a simple answer - depends what specific role is being discussed
135
PEEL for conflicting evidence - role of the father
- limitation - findings vary according to the methodology - longitudinal studies: Grossmann - secondary fathers have an important and distinct role in a child’s development - if fathers did have a distinct roles families without a father would be missing something - studies show that children do not develop differently - questions remained unanswered COUNTERPOINT - lines of research may not be in conflict - fathers take on distinctive roles - families without fathers are able to adapt to take on the role played by fathers - the question is clear after all - fathers adapt to roles but families can adapt to not having a father
136
PEEL for real world application - role of the father
- strength - can be used to offer advice to parents - families worry about having children at all - stereotypical views of mothers and fathers - fathers working may not be the most economical solution - mothers feel pressured to stay with their babies - fathers are capable to become the primary attachment figure - not having a father does not affect a child’s development - parental anxiety about the role of the father can be reduced
137
PEEL for bias in research - role of the father
- limitation - preconceptions about how fathers behave can be created by stereotypical accounts and images - made in advertising - stereotypes can cause unintentional observer bias - see what they want instead of what is actually there
138
Evaluation points for Lorenz’s research
- research support - generalizability to humans
139
Evaluation points for Harlow’s research
- real world value - generalizability to humans
140
PEEL for research support - Lorenz
- strength - existence of support for the concept of imprinting - Regolin & Vallortigara support Lorenz’s idea of imprinting - chicks were exposed to moving objects - range of shape combinations were then moved in front of them - followed the original shape more closely - young animals are born with an innate mechanisms to imprint on a moving object
141
PEEL for generalizability to humans - Lorenz
- limitation - ability to generalize findings and conclusions from birds to humans - mammalian attachment system is different and more complex than birds - mammals attachment is a two way process - young and mothers - mammalian mothers show an emotional attachment to their young - not appropriate to generalize Lorenz’s ideas to humans
142
PEEL for real world value - Harlow
- strength - helped social workers and clinical psychologists - lack of bonding experience may be a risk factor in child development - zoos and breeding programs in the wild - not just theoretical but practical
143
PEEL for generalizability to humans - Harlow
- limitation - ability to generalize findings and conclusions from monkeys to humans - monkeys are more like humans than birds - share common attachment behaviours - human brain and behaviour is still more complex than monkeys - may not be appropriate to generalize Harlow’s findings to humans
144
Evaluation points for the learning theory for attachment
- counter evidence from animal studies - counter evidence from studies on humans - some conditioning may be involved - social learning theory
145
PEEL for counter evidence from animal studies - learning theory in attachment
- limitation - lack of support from studies conducted on animals - no support for the importance of food - monkeys display attachment behaviour towards soft mothers in preference to wire mother with milk - factors other than association with food are important in the formation of attachment
146
PEEL for counter evidence from studies on humans - learning theory in attachment
- limitation - lack of support from studies of human babies - S&E found babies form their main attachment to their mothers regardless of if they feed them - Isabella sound high levels of interactional synchrony predicted the quality of attachment - not related to food - suggests food is not the main factor in the formation of human attachments
147
PEEL for some conditioning may be involved - learning theory in attachment
- strength - elements of conditioning could be involved in some aspects of attachment - unlikely association with food plays a central role in attachment - conditioning may play a role - baby may associate feeling warm and comfortable with the presence of a particular adult - may influence the baby’s choice of their main attachment figure - learning theory may still be useful in understanding the development of attachments COUNTERPOINT - classical and operant see the baby as playing a passive role in attachment - research shows this isnt true - babies play a very active role - conditioning may not be an adequate explanation of any aspect of attachment
148
PEEL for social learning theory - learning theory in attachment
- limitation - Hay & Vespa says parents teach children to love them by demonstrating attachment behaviour - reinforce loving behaviour by showing approval when a babies display their own attachment behaviour - based around two way interaction - fits better with research into the importance of reciprocity
149
Evaluation points for Bowlby’s theory of attachment
- validity of monotropy challenged - support for social releasers - support for internal working model - feminist concerns
150
PEEL for validity of monotropy challenged - Bowlby’s theory of attachment
- limitation - concept of monotropy lacks validity - significant minority of babies formed multiple attachments at the same time (S&E) - first attachment is stronger but not necessarily different - Bowlby may be incorrect that there is a unique quality and importance to the child’s primary attachment
151
PEEL for support for social releasers - Bowlby’s theory of attachment
- strength - supporting the role of social releasers - evidence that cute baby behaviours elicit interaction from caregivers - Brazelton - observed babies trigger interactions with adults using social releasers - primary attachment figure then ignored the babies social releasers - became increasingly distressed and some eventually curled up and lay motionless - role of social releasers in emotional development - are important in the process of attachment development
152
PEEL for support for internal working model - Bowlby’s theory of attachment
- strength - support for the internal working model - predicts the pattern of attachment being passed from one generation to the next - Bailey assessed attachment relationships in 99 mothers and their one year olds - measures the mothers attachment to their own primary attachment figure - assessed the attachment quality of the babies - mothers with poor attachment to primary attachment figures were more likely to be poorly attached to their babies - mothers ability to form attachments to their babies influenced by their internal working models COUNTERPOINT - other important influences on social development - genetic differences in anxiety and sociability affect social behaviour - impact parenting ability - overstated the importance of the internal working model - expense of other factors
153
PEEL for feminist concerns - Bowlby’s theory of attachment
- limitation - laws of continuity and accumulated separation - mothers work may negatively affect their child’s emotional development - sets up mothers to take the blame it anything goes wrong - gives an excuse to restrict mothers activities - people dont think the mothers role was important - mothers were not regarded necessary
154
Evaluation point for the types of attachment
- good predictive validity - good reliability - culture bound - other attachment types
155
PEEL for good predictive validity - types of attachment
- strength - predicts a number of aspects of the baby’s later development - secure attachment had better better outcomes than others - better achievement in school, less involvement in bullying - better mental health in adulthood - insecure resistant had worst outcomes - measures something real and meaningful in a baby’s development COUNTERPOINT - not all psychologists believe this something is attachment - genetically influenced anxiety levels - influence attachment and later development - may not actually measure attachment
156
PEEL for good reliability - types of attachment
- strength - good inter rater reliability - Bick tested inter-rater reliability - agreement on attachment types 94% of the time - procedure takes place under highly controlled conditions - behaviour involved large movements - easy to observe - confident attachment types assessed do not depend on subjective judgements
157
PEEL for culture bound - types of attachment
- limitation - may not be a valid measure of attachment in different cultural contexts - SS developed in Britain and US - culture bound - different experiences may affect their response to the SS - Japan: high levels of separation anxiety - not due to high rates of attachment insecurity - mother baby separation is very rare - difficult to know what the SS is measuring when used outside Europe and US
158
PEEL for other attachment types - types of attachment
- limitation - Main & Solomon found a fourth category type - type D mis of resistant and avoidant behaviours - unusually - experienced some form of severe neglect or abuse - develop psychological disorders by adulthood
159
Evaluation points for cultural variations in attachment
- indigenous research - confounding variables - imposed etic - competing explanations
160
PEEL for indigenous researchers - cultural variations in attachment
- strength - most of the studies were conducted by indigenous psychologists - same cultural backgrounds - many potential problems in cross cultural research can be avoided - language: difficulty communicating instructions to them - nations stereotypes of another - enhances the validity of the data collected COUNTERPOINT - not been true for all cross cultural attachment research - difficulties in gathering data from participants outside their own culture - data from some countries might have been affected by bias and difficulty in cross culture communication
161
PEEL for confounding variables - cultural variations in attachment
- limitation - confounding variables on findings - studies are to usually matched for methodology when compared ro used in meta-analysis - sample characteristics and environmental variables can confound results - babies might appear to explore more in studies conducted in small rooms: attractive with toys - room size may cause a child to be classified as avoidant - may not tell us anything about cross cultural patterns of attachment
162
PEEL for imposed etic - cultural variations in attachment
- limitation - trying to impose a test designed for one culture on another - ideas of emic and etic - imposed etic - babies response to reunion with a caregiver - lack of affection on reunion may indicate an avoidant attachment - US - more likely interpreted as independent - Germany - SS may not work in Germany - may not have the same meanings in different cultural contexts - comparing them is meaningless
163
What is emic
Cultural uniqueness
164
What is etic
Cross cultural universality
165
What is imposed etic
Assuming an idea or technique that works in one cultural context will work in another
166
PEEL for competing explanation - cultural variations in attachment
-limitation - found very similar attachment types in different countries - Bowlby identifies attachment as innate and universal - Van I & K suggest an alternative explanation - media gives a view of how we are meant to behave - may override traditional cultural differences in the way children are brought up
167
Evaluation points for maternal deprivation
- flawed evidence - deprivation and privation - critical versus sensitive periods - conflicting evidence
168
PEEL for flawed evidence - maternal deprivation
- limitation - poor quality of the evidence it is based on - Bowlby carried out both the family interviews and assessments for affectionless psychopathy - open to bias - knew in advance which teenagers were expected to show signs of psychopathy - also influenced by Goldfarb’s research on deprived children in wartime orphanages - confounding variables - experienced early trauma and institutional care - prolonged separation for primary caregiver - original sources had serious flaws - not be taken seriously as evidence today COUNTERPOINT - new line of research - maternal deprivation can have long term effects - separating baby rats from their mothers from as little as a day - permanent effect on their social development - other sources of evidence for his ideas
169
PEEL for deprivation and privation - maternal deprivation
- limitation - confused between different types of early experience - two types of early negative experiences - loss of primary attachment figure after attachment has developed = deprivation - failure to form any attachment = privation - deprivation is more likely to be the result of privation - may have been prived instead of deprived - Bowlby may have overestimated the seriousness of the effects of deprivation in children’s development
170
PEEL for critical versus sensitive period - maternal deprivation
- limitation - idea of critical period - damage was inevitable if attachment wasn’t formed in the first 2.5 years - good quality aftercare prevent most damage - twins experienced extreme physical and emotional abuse from 18 months until 7 years - received excellent care - fully recovered by teens - lasting harm is not inevitable - critical period is better seen as a sensitive period
171
PEEL for conflicting evidence - maternal deprivation
- limitation - attempts to replicate 44 thieves study failed to produce similar results - Lewis looked at 500 young people - no association between early separation and later psychopathy - recent research has partially supported Bowlby - poor quality maternal care was associated with high rates of psychopathy in adults