Atomic Flashcards
What is meant by reduced mass?
- effective mass of a system once centre of mass motion is separated
- 1 particle orbiting the common centre of mass
What is meant by configuration, term and level? Give an example of each
- Configuration
- arrangement of the occupancy of number of e-s for a given orbital
- L
- Carbon: 1s2 2s2 2p2
- arrangement of the occupancy of number of e-s for a given orbital
- Term
- for a given configuration, arrangement of number of e-s are split into terms to include L and S for e-s outside closed shells & subshells
- L & S
- 1D
- for a given configuration, arrangement of number of e-s are split into terms to include L and S for e-s outside closed shells & subshells
- Level
- for a given term, arrangement of e-s are split into levels to include J which arises from spin-orbit interaction
- energy splitting from LS coupling
- levels are eigenstates of J2, Jz, L2, S2
- J, L & S
- 5D2
State Hund’s 3 rules
Lowest energy when
- For a given configuration, term with max. multiplicity 2S+1
- bigger S => lower E
- For a given multiplicity, term with largest L
- bigger L => lower E
- For a given term
- outer shell less than half-full
- lower J => lower E
- outer shell more than half-full
- bigger J => lower E
- half full
- no multiplet splitting (thought it was the lower J….?)
- outer shell less than half-full
What are the dipole allowed transitions for many electron atoms?
Consider rigorous and approximate selection rules.
Rigorous rules: (I changed te order so they’re now in order of strength)
- ΔJ = 0, ± 1 {J=0 => J’=0 Forbidden}
- ΔMj = 0, ± 1 (no effect unless there is a B or E field)
- Laporte rule - parity must change
Approximate rules:
- ΔS = 0
- ΔL = 0, ± 1 {L = 0 => L’ = 0 Forbidden} (Δl = ± 1 for 1 e-)
Strong transitions:
- atomic transitions are stronger the more dipole selection rules they fulfil
Dipole selection rule for Hydrogen.
Laporte rule - parity switch
Δl = ± 1
Δm = 0, ± 1
Δs = 0
If LS coupling is significant:
Δj = 0, ± 1 (but no j = 0 => j’ = 0)
List the approximate order of strength of the dipole transitions, including those that are forbidden.
- ΔS =/= 0 - Weakly forbidden (stronger transition than ΔL =/= 0, ±1)
- ΔL =/= 0, ±1 - Forbidden (stronger than J and Laporte rule transition)
- Laporte rule violation - strongly forbidden (weaker transition)
- J = 0 => J’ = 0 - Most strongly forbidden (weakest transition)
What is metastability?
- spontantenous decay from excited state i to all final states f is a forbidden dipole transition i.e. Aif ≈ 0
- any transition from i this unlikely to occur
- e- in metastable state i is trapped there
What do the quantum numbers l, s, j, ml, ms, mj represent and what values do they take?
These are the angular momentum quantum numbers.
- l = Orbital ang. mom; l = 0,1,2,…,n-1
- gives magnitude of orb. ang. mom => l(l+1)ħ2
- ml = orbital. mag. mom; -l,…,l
- gives component of orb. ang. mom => mlħ
- s = spin ang. mom; s = 1/2 (fermions), 0 (bosons)
- gives magnitude of spin ang. mom => s(s+1)ħ2
- ms = spin mag. mom; -s,…,s
- gives component of spin ang. mom => msħ
- j = total ang. mom; j = | l - s |,…, | l + s |
- gives total ang. mom. => j(j+1)ħ2
- mj = total mag. mom; -j,…,j
- gives component of total ang. mom => mjħ
- mj = total mag. mom; -j,…,j
- gives total ang. mom. => j(j+1)ħ2
Sketching the first few spherical harmonics.
Which quantum numbers are needed to completely specify the electrons state in hydrogen?
n, l and m
How do n, l and m arise from geometrical constraints on the wavefunction.
- n - arises from the need for the radial solution to converge
- => leads to energy quantisation, n is an integer.
- l - need for polar solution to converge, l is an integer.
- m - need for φ(…) = φ(…+2π), m must be an integer.
How do we find the radial probability density (measure of finding e- at distance from the nucleus)?
Give the number of peaks for the curve of a particular (n,l) state.
- total probability density for the wavefunction is split into radial and angular parts - don’t forget the spherical coordinates (Jacobian gives r2)
- radial probability density = integral of |Rnl(r)2| r2 from 0 to infinity
- spherical harmonics are normalised
- radial probability density = integral of |Rnl(r)2| r2 from 0 to infinity
- Can sketch the distribution for different quantum states in Hydrogen
- (n - l) peaks
Using the hydrogen radial distribution curves, what is meant by “electron penetration”” and what are the consequences for the order in which orbitals are filled?
- Electron penetration describes degree to which e-s in diff. (n,l) states penetrate region occupied by 1s electrons
- varies with l (and n, but less so)
- The more they penetrate this region, the less shielding and the more effective nuclear charge they feel.
- hence more tighly bound by the nucleus
- => have lower energy levels
- Since orbitals are filled in order of increasing energy, states with lower l are filled first
- For a given n, probability of finding e- near nucleus decreases with increasing l (further from nucleus) since centrifugal barrier pushes e- out so radius of sphere is greater
What is the Zeeman effect?
- splitting of spectral lines caused by energy shifts (arise from LS coupling) associated with magnetic dipole moment interacting with an external magnetic field is applied
Describe the weak field Zeeman effect.
- Normal zeeman:
- Atoms have zero net spin: closed shells/subshells
- Consider effect of only orbital angular momentum - μL
- Splitting only from interaction of L with B
- Anomalous zeeman:
- Net spin is non-zero
- Splitting from both L and S interaction with field
- => ΔE = μBBgJMJ (energy shift between the level splittings)
Describe the Paschen-Back case.
- B field is strong enough to uncouple L and S which then precess independently about the direction of the B field.
- Energy splitting now just the sum of the splitting due to L and S independently
- Can determine if field is strong by comparing it to LS splitting - if zeeman splitting is > the smallest LS splitting => strong field.
- ΔEL = μBBgLML
- gL = 1
- ΔES = μBBgSMS
- gS = 2
- ΔEL = μBBgLML
What is the Stark effect?
- Splitting of energy levels due to the application of an external E field.
What is the Quadratic Stark effect?
- atoms with no intrinsic dipole moment
- field polarises e- density inducing dipole moment p
- which is proportional to Eext
- so interaction energy VE = -p.Eext = -(1/2)αE2ext
- α = dipole polarisability
- hence varies quadratically with field
- interaction of dipole moment with E field => energy splitting
- energy shift given by eqn
- where A & B are level dependent constants
What is the linear stark effect?
- Atoms with intrinsic dipole moment (e.g. excited states of H & H-like atoms which have l-degeneracy)
- E field causes mixing of states with m =/=0
- applied E field in z direction connects states with Δl = ±1 & Δml = 0
- due to electric dipole selection rules
- applied E field in z direction connects states with Δl = ±1 & Δml = 0
- States with m=0 are centre on x-y plane but E in z direction
- E field pulls e-s to left or right and causes a mixing eigenstates of s and p states which then experience a +ve or -ve energy shift of ΔE
- Perturbing potential does not act on states where e- distributions are concentrated in x-y plane
- eigenstates of H = H0 + eEextz are also eigenstates of H0 so no work in mixing wavefns => energy is linear in Eext
- exctied state behaves as if it had electric dipole of magnetic 3ea0
Describe the Stern-Gerlach experiment
- demonstrated the quantisation of e- spin in 2 orientations
- silver atoms beam in the s state placed in non-uniform B field
- atoms experience a force along B field direction
- Since mag. moment of atoms can classically point in any direction => spread expected?
- 2 beams in opp directions observed
Linear stark energy diagram
- ψ+ ( sum of states) has e- density shifted towards -z, so mag. dipole is direction of E => ΔE < 0
- ψ- (diff. of states) has e- density shifted towards +z, so dipole antiparallel to E => ΔE > 0
What is the quantum defect and how does it vary with the quantum numbers n and l?
- Quantifies departure from Hydrogenic behaviour - correction term to n.
- Alkali atom has single optically active (valence) electron
- further out it is (higher l), the smaller the effective nuclear charge it feels (due to inner e-s & their shielding effects)
- and the closer to a hydrogenic e- it is
- further out it is (higher l), the smaller the effective nuclear charge it feels (due to inner e-s & their shielding effects)
- Quantum defect decreases with l and n, although more slowly with n.
What is jj coupling?
- high Z atoms where spin-orbit interactions >> e-e interaction ( spin-spin or orbit-orbit interactions)
- individual orbital angular momenum combines with corresponding individual e- spin to from individual total angular momentum
How to calculate the quantum defect
- Note in the original quantum defect formula, the energy represents the energy above the ground state
- => this is equivalent to the energy of the particular (n,l) state subtracting the ionisation energy (ground state energy)
- Replace the E in the formula with Enl with (Enl - Eion)
- Eobserved = Eion + Enl(outer electron)
- => Eobs - Eion/hc = -RMZeff2/neff2
- Zeff = 1 for alkali metal atoms
What is L-S coupling (Russell-Saunders coupling)?
- low Z atoms when e-e interaction dominates
- individual e- spin combines to form S
- individual orbital angular momenta combines to form L
- L & S couple to form J
How to calculate the limit when an external B field considered to be strong?
- When spin orbit splitting ≈ separation of the sub-levels due to weak B field
- ΔESO ≈ gJμBB
What is meant by hyperfine structure?
- energy level splitting from coupling of net nuclear spin I and J (F = I + J)
- Inclusion of net nuclear spin causes further energy perturbation besides spin-orbit coupling
- interaction of net nuclear spin I with atom’s internal magnetic field
- Inclusion of net nuclear spin causes further energy perturbation besides spin-orbit coupling
What is Pauli exclusion principle for multielectron atoms? And what does this imply about their wavefunctions? Why can’t electrons have the same quantum numbers?
- e-s are fermions so each e- in multi e- atom must be described by a different spin-orbital
- total wavefns must be antisymmetric wrt exchanged of e-s
- since no 2 fermions can occupy the same quantum state
- if nlm = n’l’m’ then it would not satisfy the antisymmetry of the total wavefn
What are the 3 processes that occur when a 2 level system is in eqm with a radiation field?
- Absorption
- atom absorbs photon from field & is excited to higher E state
- rate of absorption is proportional to pop. of ground state (N) & energy density U
- atom absorbs photon from field & is excited to higher E state
- Spontaneous emission
- atom decays from excited state emitting a photon
- rate of decay is proportional to excited state pop. (N2)
- atom decays from excited state emitting a photon
- Stimulated emission
- photon from field causes excited atom to decay and emit photon
- rate of emission proportional to excited state pop. N2 & energy level U
- photon from field causes excited atom to decay and emit photon
How can alkali atoms be cooled to sufficiently low temps to form Bose-Einstein condensate?
- To achieve cooling, atoms must be sufficiently slowed to about 1cms-1
- (at room temp. atoms have velocities of several hundred ms-1)
- atoms are bombarded with many photons with energies close to transition frequency
- many since one has too little effect as pphoton << patoms
- atoms subjected to pair of counterpropagating (photon) laser beams
- Atoms see photons as doppler shifted
- beam towards (opposite direction to) atom will be blueshifted (higher frequency)
- beam in (same) direction of atoms motion will be redshifted (lower frequency)
- probability of scattering (absorption + re-emitting) a photon depends exponentially on how close a laser is tuned to resonance
- blueshifted [v’= vL(1-v/c)] => closer to resonance so probability increases (mainly absorbed)
- redshifted [v’ = vL(1-v/c)] => further from resonance so probability decreases
- Upon scattering, net momentum of p = hvL/c transferred to atom
- atom decays and emits photon causing atom to recoil
- Direction of emission random so effect of recoil averages to 0 => net momentum transfer to atoms against atoms direction of motion
- Frictional force on atoms depends on velocity (viscous damping)
- faster atoms experience larger force slowing them down
- => narrowing of momentum distribution as T decreased to around 10-6 K
- atom trap wtih 3 lasers along each x, y, z axis, and inhomogenous B field added to confine atoms
- BEC (all atoms occupy & is described by same wavefn) formed at around 10-7 ~ 10-9 => requires further techniqe of evaporative cooling (letting “hotter” atoms escape)
What is Moseley’s law? And when does the law apply?
- vif = frequency of main x-ray emission line
- Z = atomic number
- S = screening constant (depends on series)
- Zeff = Z -S
- SK = 1
- SL = 7.4
- Cn = empirical constant independent of Z
- This law is used to find the frequencies of characteristic x-rays => applied in characteristic x-ray spectra
What are the K-series, L-series and M-series? And what are the subscripts within each series?
Transitions form series (groups of lines) which are defined by final state of transitions nf
- nf = 1 => K-series
- nf = 2 => L-series
- nf = 3 => M-series
Within each series, Δn = ni - nf is denoted by subscripts
- Δn = 1 => α
- Δn = 2 => β
- Δn = 3 => γ
What are the selection rules for vibration-rotation transitions for (ground electronic state of a heteronuclear) diatomic molecule? What frequency range do these transitions occur?
- Δv = ±1 (vibrational - from selection rules of harmonic oscillator)
- |J - J’| = 1 (rotational)
- Infra red frequencies
What is the Franck-Condon principle? How does it account for relative intensities of various vibrational bands in transitions between different molecular electronic states? What is the Frank-Condon factor in terms of initial and final state wavefns?
- distribution of final vibrational states after transitions between molecular eelctronic states are determined by overlap of vibrational wavefns between ground and excited state (vibrational energy levels)
- transitions between vibrational states typically occur for states in which overlap is greater since transition is much faster than nuclei speed, therefore nuclei don’t move far in this time
- hence smaller difference in nuclear coordinates of these states
- so states with bigger overlaps have higher transmission probability
- => higher intensity bands
- I = Franck-Condon Factor
- v” = vibrational wavefn of lower state (final)
- v’ = vibrational wavefn of upper state (initial)
What are the singlet and triplet spin wavefns for a 2 e- atom? And give their symmetry
- state S = 0
- gives Ms = 0
- => singlet state
- Antisymmetric w.r.t exchange
- gives Ms = 0
- S = 1
- gives Ms = -1, 0, 1
- => triplet state
- Symmetric w.r.t exchange.
- gives Ms = -1, 0, 1
- spin-up × spin down cancels
What condition does symmetry of spin part of wavefn place on spatial part of wavefn? Why is ground state of helium a spin singlet?
- e-s are fermions hence total wavefn is antisymmetric
- if spin = antisymmetric then spatial = symmetric; vice versa
- e-s in ground state of helium have same n, l and m numbers
- so the spatial part is symmetric (since the antisymmetric part is 0)
- hence spin part has to be antisymmetric => spin singlet
What is meant by total collision cross-section and differential cross-section in particle scattering experiments?
- total (σT): effective area (normal to direction of incidence) provided by a target to an incoming projectile
- differential: particle flux cattered by each target nucleus into solid angle dΩ divided by incoming intensity
- flux = particles per unit time
- intensity = particles per unit time per unit area = flux per unit area
What is Beer-Lambert law?
- n = density
- l = length of cell
- I/I0 = 100% - %attenuation
- σT = total collisional cross-section
State the Pauli exclusion principle.
- Wave-functions are anti-symmetric w.r.t exchange of identical fermions
- and symmetric w.r.t exchange of identical bosons.
Why are (L + S) odd forbidden by the Pauli exclusion principle?
- If L is odd => odd pairing of e-s with the same l
- so there maybe an e- which doesn’t have a pair e- with the same n and l value
- therefore under exchange, the set up is now different
- => spatial wavefunction is antisymmetric
- forces the spin part to be symmetric.
- But L+S is odd so S is even
- spin wavefunction is antisymmetric
- if both spin and spatial are antisymmetric
- then total wavefunction is symmetric
- => forbidden by Pauli
When is the magnetic field in Zeeman effect considered strong?
Draw uncoupled LS diagram.
- If the splitting due to B field is bigger than the splitting due to LS coupling.