approaches to social development Flashcards

1
Q

harmonizes the ECONOMIC, SOCIAL and other dimensions of the DEVELOPMENT PROCESS and stresses the importance of social INVESTMENT and fosters people’s PARTICIPATION in projects and programmes (Midgley, 2013, p. 107)

A

SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

6 TYPES OF PERSPECTIVES

A

LEGCES
Livelihood perspective
Enterprise perspective
Gender perspective
Community participatory perspective
Environmental or sustainable development perspective
Statist perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

TYPES OF APPROACH

A

BASIC NEEDS APPROACH
SOCIAL SERVICES APPROACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROACH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

BASIC NEEDS APPROACH

Introduced by ___ _____ _____ in ____ during the WORLD EMPLOYMENT CONFERENCE

A

International Labour organization (ILO) ; 1976

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

BASIC NEEDS APPROACH: RATIONALE

RAISE the ________ ______OF LIVING of the masses of poor people as RAPIDLY as FEASIBLE and to provide all human beings with the opportunity to DEVELOP their _____ _____ (Streeten and Burki, 1978 in Wong, 2012)

A

SUSTAINABLE LEVEL
FULL POTENTIAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

BASIC NEEDS APPROACH: CENTRAL NOTION

identify a BUNDLE of _____ _____ (or bundle of COMMODITIES) and assess whether the population has adequate ______ to it (i.e., for households = food, shelter, clothing, household equipment / for community = safe drinking water, sanitation, public transpo, health, education and cultural facilities)

A

BASIC CONSUMPTION ; ACCESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

BASIC NEEDS APPROACH (BNA) EXAMPLE:

a condition of lacking resources necessary to acquire a
nutritionally adequate diet set at 2,100 kcal per capita per day. (Greer and Thorbacke, 1986).

A

FOOD INTAKE APPROACH/ FOOD POVERTY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CRITICISMS OF THE BASIC NEEDS APPROACH

A

FAIR UF
FIXED BUNDLE ignores individual choice: Limited attention to varying needs (like shelter and education), especially if food is the only poverty metric.

ARBITRARILY decided consumption bundle: Determined by a few professionals, lacking broader input.

IGNORES HIERARCHY OF NEEDS: Fails to account for different levels or prioritization of needs among individuals.

REALITY OF FLUCTUATING PRICES dismissed: Assumes stable prices, despite market unpredictability.

UNIVERSAL NEEDS APPROACH assumption: Assumes all goods in the bundle are needed equally, overlooking changes in individual priorities over time.

FOCUS ON MATERIALISM: Too centered on physical needs and material deprivation, without addressing other aspects of well-being.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Based on the Philippine Development Plan:

A

SOCIAL SERVICES APPROACH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

SOCIAL SERVICES APPROACH

Provides access of Filipinos to _____ BASIC SOCIAL SERVICE delivery in education, training and culture; health and nutrition; population and development; housing; social protection; and asset reform

A

QUALITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

SOCIAL SERVICES APPROACH
Focuses on ensuring an _______ POLICY ENVIRONMENT for ________ GROWTH, poverty reduction, convergence of service delivery, maximized synergies and ACTIVE MULTISTAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION

A

ENABLING ; INCLUSIVE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

PRIORITY strategies for social services approach

A

SUSTAIN PAD –

  • strengthening CIVIL SOCIETY PARTICIPATION, basic sector involvement, and public-private partnerships (PPP)
  • universal coverage in HEALTH and basic EDUCATION
  • SOCIAL PROTECTION programs CONVERGING for priority beneficiaries and target areas
  • transfer of CONDITIONAL CASH (CCT) to support the poor
  • accelerating ASSET REFORM
  • incorporating CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION and DISASTER RISK REDUCTION into social development
  • Nurturing COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT (CDD) approach
  • promoting VOLUNTERISM
  • advancing GENDER and DEVELOPMENT in all sectors
  • DEVELOPING and enhancing the COMPETENCE of BUREOCRACY and INSTITUTIONS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

creates conditions of economic and social progress for the whole community with the active participation
of and largely upon the INITIATIVE OF THE COMMUNITY

(Source: Social Development: Philippine Approach, 1980)

A

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROACH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

community development approach
APPEALS of the approach include:

A

GADS
- GUIDS SELF-HELP and RECOGNIZES LABOR contribution of local people on projects (i.e., counterparting)
- ASSURANCE on the ALLOCATION of SUFFICIENT RESOURCES to these efforts at the grassroots level
- DEMOCRATIZATION and DECENTRALIZATION of the POLITICAL PROCESS
- SELF-HELP based PROGRAMS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

KALAHI-CIDSS (Kapit Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan – Comprehensive and Integrated Delivery of Social Services)

A way of doing things

A

WAY/PROCESS OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION involving local prioritization & allocation of public resources, planning & implementation of development activities

TRANSPARENCY, access to info: community reporting & announcement of info (i.e., KC grievance redress system accessible to citizens in the barangay & general public

PARTICIPATION in BA meetings/inter-barangay forum

DECISION-MAKING= inclusive and participatory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

KALAHI-CIDSS

A

Kapit Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan – Comprehensive and Integrated Delivery of Social Services

17
Q

KALAHI-CIDDS EMPLOYS COMMUNITY-BASED AND DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT (why CDD?)

A

HIDEI
- HELPS to improve OPERATION and maintenance of INFRASTRUCTURE
- INCREASES COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT in decision-making and implementation
- DELIVERS good qua, cost-effective INFRASTRUCTURE and PUBLIC SERVICES with high economic return
- ENHANCES targeting of POORER AREAS
- INCREASES INCOME of PARTICIPATING COMMUNITY MEMBERS

18
Q

HOW KALAHI-CIDDS DOES IT?

A

Making resources TARGETED

FACILITATING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 🡪 using proven tools to mobilize and support communities to get involved

MAKING RESOURCE USE DEMAND-DRIVEN 🡪 Open project menu based on informed choice

Making PDIME accessible and popular 🡪 prioritization, procurement, finance, community-based monitoring.

Design SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES that communities can use 🡪 village assemblies, community volunteer committees, direct fund transfers, grievance redress.

Building CAPACITY 🡪 community (demand-side) and local government (supply-side)

19
Q

OUTPUTS OF KC-1

In ______ barangays in _____ municipalities in the _____ poorest provinces and municipalities in the country

A

4,583 barangays; 200 municipalities; 42 poorest provinces and municipalities

20
Q

OTHER APPROACHES

A

WHOLE OF NATION APPROACH
CAPABILITY APPROACH
RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH
CONSCIENTIZATION APPROACH
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE APPROACH

21
Q

The hallmark program of the NTF-ELCAC, the ___ ___ ___ was established with the end goal of bringing DEVELOPMENT TO FORMER CONFLICT RIDDEN COMMUNITIES

A

BARANGAY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (BDP)

22
Q

Based largely on the work of Amartya Sen LINKING POVERTY to the broader discussion of HUMAN DEVELOPMENT

A

CAPABILITY APPROACH

23
Q

Two indispensable elements OF CAPABILITY APPROACH

A

FUNCTIONINGS AND FREEDOM

24
Q

various things a person may VALUE DOING OR BEING (Sen, 1999) like social participation, ability to spread ideas or being respected. RERFRAINS from adopting a MATERIALISTIC WORLDVIEW.

A

FUNCTIONINGS (TO DO)

25
Q

ability to choose and prioritize various combinations of functionings.

A

FREEDOM (TO BE)

26
Q

” Hence, the general notion is that people should not only achieve valuable functionings, but also have the FREEDOM TO PURSUE those values”

A

ALKIRE 2002

27
Q

IMPLICATIONS OF CAPABILITY APPROACH

A

ANTI-POVERTY INITIATIVES, therefore, implies the enlargement of people’s choices, such as the opportunities to lead a long, healthy and creative life and to enjoy a decent standard of living, freedom, dignity, self-respect and the respect of others (UNDP, 1997)

Guided and became the BASIS of the UN HUMAN DEV REPORT

28
Q

CAPABILITY APPROACH CHALLENGES / CRITICISMS

A

DIFFICULT to set a common yardstick for measuring poverty (esp. within and across nations. What will be the BASIS for COMPARISON?)

The EXACT ARRAY OF FUNCTIONINGS may be unknown.

Requires MORE MATERIAL INPUT (e.g. needs institutional, social or cultural inputs) AT MULTIPLE LEVELS.

29
Q

centers on the idea that every individual has INHERENT RIGHTS that must be upheld and protected

A

RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH

30
Q

RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH Article _____: Sections ____

A

Article III: Sections 1-22

31
Q

focuses on raising critical AWARENESS and CONSCIOUSNESS among individuals about OPPRESSIVE SYSTEMS and structures

A

CONSCIENTIZATION APPROACH

32
Q

CONSCIENTIZATION APPROACH was popularized by

A

PAULO FREIRE

33
Q

It aims to address systemic issues and transform structures that perpetuate inequality and exclusion

A

INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE APPROACH

34
Q

THE LIFE WE WANT: MATATAG

A

FAMILY is Together
Time with FRIENDS
WORK-LIFE balance
Strong sense of COMMUNITY (Volunteer opportunities)

35
Q

THE LIFE WE WANT: MAGINHAWA

A

Free from HUNGER and OVERTY
Secure HOME ownership
Good TRANSPORT
TRAVEL and Vacation

36
Q

THE LIFE WE WANT: PANATAG

A

Enough RESOURCES for day-to-day needs and unexpected expenses
PEACE and SECURITY
Long and HEALTHY Life
Comfortable RETIREMENT