Appraising the Trustworthiness and Integrity in Qualitative Research Flashcards
There is an argument on what reagrding qualitative researchers
should qualitative researchers return to the terminology of the social sciences
a debate about rigor and validity - should there be validity if there is no way to measure it - is validity absurd?
How is validity important to qualitative and quantitative studies? How does it differ in qualitative research?
It is an appropriate quality criterion in both bu qualitative researchers have to use different methods to achieve it since there is no way of measuring traditional validity of their data
What is the generic v specific standard argument
Should there be a generic set of quality standards or a specific standard needed for different qualitative traditions
Some frameworks and criteria strive to be generic while others are specific to a tradition
What is the terminology proliferation and confusion problem in qualitative analysis
there is no common vocabulary so terminology can be confusing
words like goodness, truth value, integrity, trustworthiness, validity and rigor may all be used in one study or another while other refute these terms
In actuality how is qualitative research usually reacted to be readers
usually differently based on who is reading it - like a poem each reader finds different meaning
What is the current cold standard of qualitative quality criteria
Lincoln and Guba’s Quality Criteria (However these are still not universally accepted and are just proposals still)
The key goal in Lincoln and Guba’s Quality Criteria is ____
trustworthiness
This concerns the “Truth value” of qualitative data, analysis and interpretation
What are the (now) 5 criteria for enhancing trustworthiness of a qualitative inquiry according to Lincoln and Guba
- Credibility
- Dependability
- Confirmability
- Transferability
- Authenticity (New)
Credibility
refers to confidence in the truth value of the data and interpretations of them
Qualitative researchers must strive to establish this confidence in the truth of the findings
What is the quantitative analog to Credibility
Internal Validity
Credibility involves what 2 aspects
- Carrying out the study in a way that enhances the believability of the findings
- Taking steps to demonstrate credbility to external readers
Despite credibility not being universally accepted…
it is used in many quality frameworks
Dependability
stability of data over time and over conditions
So: Would the study findings be repeated if the inquiry were repicated wiht the same (or similar) participants in the same (or similar) context?
What is the quantitative analog of Dependability
Reliability
____ cannot be attained in the absence of dependability
credibility (cant have confidence if you dont have the stability)
Confirmability
Refers to the objectivity - the potential for congruence between two or more independent people about the datas accuracy, relevance, or meaning
Establishing that the data represent the information participants provided and that the interpretations of those data are not IMAGINED by the inquirer
What is the quantitative analog of Confirmability
Objectivity