A2 - Turning to Crime - Cognitive - Criminals' Thinking Patterns Flashcards

1
Q

Cognitive background #1

A

Answer #1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cognitive background #2

A

Answer #2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who conducted a study on ‘Criminals’ thinking patterns’?

A

Yochelson & Samenow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the sample used?

A

255 male offenders resident in a secure psychiatric hospital in the USA - guilty by reasons of insanity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What kind of study was it?

A

A longitudinal study using a series of interviews, based on Freudian therapy techniques, which lasted 14years, that aimed to identify the root cause of their criminal behaviour in the past.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did they find?

A
  • Offenders have cognitive processes, which lead to a distorted self-image and result in criminal choices and denial of responsibility.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many thinking patterns?

A

They found 52 thinking patterns that criminals will have more than the general population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What character traits were found?

A

Feelings of worthlessness, lying and need for power and control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What automatic thinking errors?

A

Poor decision making, lack of trust, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What crime-related thinking errors?

A

Fantasies of anti-social behaviour, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are examples of errors and biases?

A
  • Closed thinking > not receptive to criticism
  • External Attributions > views self as victim
  • Ownership of attitude > sees all things, places and people for their use
  • Perception of self > sees solely positivity and fails to acknowledge their faults
  • Perception of uniqueness > sees themselves as superior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What conclusions were made?

A
  • Errors in thinking, were found more in criminals.
  • Criminals aren’t impulsive, they have planned and fantasised about their actions.
  • Treatment involves challenging their thinking patterns
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is the study low in generalizability?

A

There was an androcentric sample, which means findings are less generalizable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is the study low in validity?

A
  • Demand characteristics and social desirability bias

- High attrition rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How is the study high in validity?

A
  • Longitudinal study: allows them to study change over time in criminal’s behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is the study low in reliability?

A

Researcher bias, subjectivity opens different interpretations.

17
Q

Name all 4 evaluative points.

A
  1. Low generalizability
  2. Low validity
  3. High validity
  4. Low reliability