9.2 Sustance Abuse Flashcards
The first-line supervisor plays what role in any successful substance testing program?
the most important
For the substance test to be effective, each supervisor must ensure that:
(a) ___________ ____________ is supported by proper documentation;
(b) The sample is
(c) The ______ __ _______ is maintained;
and
(d) The employee’s rights ___ ___ ________
Reasonable suspicion
properly collected;
chain of custody
are not violated.
all departmental employees (shall/should/may) alert a supervisor to indications that another employee is involved in substance abuse
Shall
Before any sample is obtained, the supervisor’s foundation for reasonable suspicion must be approved by:
a specified departmental manager
Due process procedures must be properly followed to protect all of the employee’s interests. This means the employee must be made aware of(3):
The Department must also take necessary precautions to ensure the sample is properly:
the exact reasons for the Department’s actions,
the consequences of a positive test result
and/or what action the Department will take if the employee refuses to submit to the requested test.
collected, identified, and analyzed.
T/F
Liability may not arise when it can be shown that a supervisor negligently failed to supervise subordinates appropriately, and the negligence resulted in an injury to a co-worker and/or the public, but the Department can be held vicariously liable.
False, Liability can arise when it can be shown that a supervisor negligently failed to supervise subordinates appropriately.
But true, also vicarious liability for the department
More frequently, courts are holding employers directly responsible for retaining “dangerous” employees. This is called:
Negligent Retention.
Case law has established that the provisions of POBR do not apply to certain criminal investigations conducted by an employing agency
False, may apply
No state employee who is on duty or on standby for duty shall:
(a) Use, possess, or be under the influence of illegal or unauthorized drugs or other illegal mind-altering substances; or
(b) Use or be under the influence of alcohol to any extent that would:
impede the employee’s ability to perform their duties safely and effectively.
T/F
Only employees serving in sensitive positions shall be subject to substance testing when there is reasonable suspicion to believe the employee has violated paragraph 2.a. of this chapter.
True
T/F
Employees must report any known physical condition which might reasonably be expected to adversely affect job performance, including the use of drugs or medication
True
T/F
In a voluntary drug test situation, an employee’s decision not to be tested shall not be documented as a refusal, since it is the employee’s option.
True
If the employee requests a voluntary test, the Department (will/will not) pay for it.
Will
Reasonable suspicion is a ____ _____ ______ based upon ________ ___________ _____ or evidence that an employee violated the substance abuse policy.
good faith belief
Specific Articulable Facts
Sensitive classification defined
Duties involve a:
level of trust, responsibility for or impact on the:
greater than normal
health and safety of others.
Sensitive classification defined
Errors in judgment, inattentiveness or diminished coordination, dexterity or composure while performing duties could clearly result in mistakes that would:
endanger the health and safety of others;
Sensitive classification defined
Employees in these positions work with such independence or perform such tasks that it cannot be safely assumed that mistakes such as those described in paragraph 2.a.(2) above could be:
prevented by a supervisor or other departmental employee.
Uniformed employees are noticed in regards to Cal-HR’s rules for substance abuse testing at what time?
Non-uniformed?
What is done with the notices?
At the beginning of the academy as cadets.
During pre-employment process
All are forwarded to cal-hr and placed in employees field folder.
If a supervisor develops reasonable suspicion that a non-sensitive employee is displaying signs of substance abuse, the supervisor (shall/shall not/should/should not/may) attempt to elicit a chemical test from the employee.
Shall not
Under what circumstances can a chemical test be collected from an employee in a non-sensitive classification position?
Only in response to an unsolicited request by the employee.
Since a chemical test will not normally be part of the substance abuse investigation of a non sensitive employee, it is essential that the supervisor’s final determination be based upon (3):
(1) Articulable facts; (2) Close observation; and (3) Good faith.
non-sensitive position
Circumstances, observations, and/or witness statements leading to a determination of substance abuse shall be documented using the:
format
Reasonable Suspicion Report
non-sensitive position
Adverse action (shall/should/may) be sought when there is a determination of substance abuse.
The requested penalty should be consistent with:
Should
the specific described circumstances surrounding the abuse.
Reasonable suspicion
Employee testing has been repeatedly upheld by the courts where there is reasonable suspicion to believe the employee was:
impaired
Reasonable suspicion
Testing has been focused on those instances when the state’s need is:
and where:
alone, cannot be relied upon completely.
most compelling
less intrusive methods
Reasonable suspicion is the good faith belief based on:
(1) Specific articulable facts or evidence that an employee may have:
and
(2) Substance testing:
violated the substance abuse policy;
could reveal evidence in support of a violation.
Reasonable suspicion exists only after:
the appointing power or a designee (confirming official) has also considered the facts and/or evidence and agrees that they constitute a finding of reasonable suspicion.
If the supervisor believes criminal violations(s) exist, a criminal investigation should be conducted (prior/subsequent) to the administrative investigation
Prior, with every effort to maintain separation
T/F
A criminal investigation report involving nonuniformed employees may not be used to support an admin. investigation unless the incident described in the report resulted in a conviction
Admin investigators may not conduct interviews of criminal investigators to gather evidence in support of the administrative investigation.
True
False, they may
T/F
Use of the PAS device to establish reasonable suspicion is authorized.
False, is not authorized
Supervisors must remember, that (amount) detected level of alcohol is prohibited by the statement of:
Any
Inconsistent and Incompatible Activities.
T/F
If reasonable suspicion is established, any subsequent chemical tests must still be administered using a breath alcohol analyzing instrument which meets the State Department of Health Services standard.
True
Nonuniformed supervisors (shall/should/may) seek the assistance of a uniformed supervisor to corroborate reasonable suspicion, whenever possible
Should
If the Substance Abuse Investigation Interview is conducted, the supervisor should keep in mind the employee’s rights under:
Only those questions pertaining to:
should be asked
the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBR).
the employee’s possible need for medical attention
T/F
When considered credible, anonymous tips may be the basis for initiating closer observation of the employee to determine if other articulable facts or evidence exist which establish reasonable suspicion.
True
CalHR requires that a reliable informant providing information in a substance abuse case, be:
should that become necessary.
a peace officer who is willing to publicly testify on behalf of management