6 - Configural Learning Flashcards
define configural theory
strength of response to novel stimulus determined by the similarity btwn it and previously experienced stimulus, multiplied by assoc strength of prev experienced stimuli
define discriminate
using experience to know two stimuli are different
define generalisation
recognising one stimulus is similar to one we have previously experienced so expected a similar outcome
define negative patterning
training animals to expect an outcome in the presence of A, of B, but none w A and B together
how is negative patterning differnt to blocking
animals trained all associations at the same time
what do animals learn in negative patterning
struggle to learn A+B=no outcome as have assoc of A and B leading to outcomes
why if the RW model summative
when learning ab A and B’s assoc strengths, they are added together when presented together
what does the RW model predict, causing issues w the model
animals would expect A and B lead to twice the outcome and wouldn’t expect no outcome
the revised RW model accomdated what and how
negative patterning by including X
when A and B presented together, animals see A+B+X, with X leading to no outcome
in RW, what does X act as
abstract and configural cue entering association that A+B presented as configuration
X is defined as what else apart from a configural cue
conditioned inhibitor so we expect nothing in presence of X
Pearce stated that we see A+B as what
not as a compound but as its own stimulus whereas RW/elemental say A+B is a configuration
Pearce states we respond to compounds how
in the way we respond to encountered stimuli during training, so expect AB to lead to double the outcome as similar to A and B
what does the generalisation equation look at
change in excitatory strength instead of assoc strength
the configural model states that all assoc strength will be given to what if we train that AB leads to a shock
to AB as a compound and none to A or B separately as don’t learn anything ab A or B