5 - Learning Theory Flashcards
non-associative forms of learning
habituation
sensitisation
define habituation
becoming accustomed to certain things so show a decrease in responding over trials due to repeated exposure of same stimulus
is habituation permanenet
no as dishabituation can occur
is habituation stimulus specific or unspecific
specific
define sensitisation
increase in responding over many trials as become sensitive to the arrival of a particular stimulus due to being repeatedly exposed to it
what point in trials can sensitisation occur
early trials of habituation
describe Karmin’s experimental condition
A presented w shock in phase 1
A and B together w shock in phase 2
what did was the result of Karmin’s experimental condition
animals didn’t freeze in anticipation of shock when only B shown
describe Karmin’s control condition and results
phase 1: nothing
phase 2: A, B, and shock
test: animals froze expecting shock when only B presented
Karmin explained the results how
surprise is important and animals think noise predicts shock
how was the experimental condition explained by Karmin
don’t learn B as a shock predictor as surprised when shock and A occured in phase 1, so primed to think A causes the shock
how did Karmin explain the control condition
surprised when A and B occur w a shock so in the test they freeze as think A and B cause the shock
describe unblocking
phase 1: A and shock
phase 2: A, B, and 2 shocks so learn something about B, causing them to freeze when only b PRESENTED
Criticisms of Karmin
used an aversive outcome which if different to a reward, and this can’t be replicated in humans
define error driven learning
when something happens which wasn’t completely expected, there’s a change in the assoc strength btwn 2 sitmuli so learning poccurs
what do 0 and 1 mean in terms of assoc strength
0 if don’t expect second stimulus to happen when another is presented
1 if they do expect
what does the change in assoc strength represent
surprise
equation for change in assoc strength
correlation of what happened - correlation of what expected to happen/existing assoc strength based on prev experiences
(EDL) what is there an error between
what we expect to happen and what actually happens
over trials, how would we expect the assoc strength to change
assoc strength small in first trial, steep increase in first 10, then plateaus as no more learning occurs
in blocking how does the assoc strength change
increases in phase 1 then plateaus end of phase
phase 2: strength = 1 as A present so no learning occurs and not surprised
describe the process of summation/cue competition
when stimuli presented in compound, assoc strength added together
in summation, what happens when 2 or 1 stimuli are presented
if two, they each get half the assoc strength, and if one, get all of it
describe conditioned inhibition
training an animal to learn that a stimuli can act as an inhibitor to the outcome occuring