4b Flashcards
whats H made up of
1 proton
1 electron
in a hydrogen,, how do we define where the e- is in respect to the proton
we draw a +1 dot for the proton and draw a ‘x’ , ‘y’, and ‘z’ axis coming out of it.
the z axis is going up,, the y axis is coming towards us and the x axis is going to the rhs
the e- we then draw in its position
proton is at the origin
H’ = what
T’ + V’
potential and kinetic energy
H’ = what more specific: energy of the system!!: total way the system has energy
H’ = T’.nuc + T’.el + V’. nuc-el
bc the nuc can move and so has kinetic energy
the e- can move and have kinetic energy
the potential energy between the nuc and the e-
how the nuc + el move and energy between those 2 things.
in the H atom when we draw the 3 line axis wirth the nuc and the electron,,, can the potential energy,, V’ ,, equal to 0
nope
its no longer 0 bc its the nergy between the nuc and the electron
and bc they have opposite charges they have potential energy.
what does V’ nuc-el mean and how does it change
energy between nuc and electron bc theyre oppositely charged this isnt 0.
the distance between the nuc and the electron alters the V’. nuc-el.
bc the nuc is so heavy,, what does the e- think about it
the e- think its stood still
bc the e- moves so fast and the proton moves so slow the e- thinks its not moving.
e- just follows the proton / nuc.
bc the nuc barely moves bc its so much heavier (made up of 1 proton) than the e- ,, in hydrogen,, what can we say about H’
we said H’ = T’.nuc + T’.el + V’.nuc-el
but bc we just said the nuc is sm heavier and so it looks like its not moving,, we can say the
H’ = T’.el + V’.nuc-el
nuc T’ has a tiny tiny effect so we can ignore its Ke. we just need to think about where the e- is.
born oppenheimer approx
basically saying how H’ is approx equal to H’ = T’el + V’.nuc-el
due to nuc moving so slowly - we can ignore its T’
so using the born oppenheimer approx,, how can we write the schrodinger equation:
HY = EY for a H atom.
(V’nuc-el + T’. el)Y = EY
how many directions can the e- move in
the e- can move in 3 different directions
so we need a 3Dimensional
okay so if movement of an e- is now 3D,, what do we need to change
what T’.el is equal to
T’.el = - (h.dash^2/2me x V-^2)
where m = mass of an e-.
V-^2 = del squared = d2/dx2 + d2/dy2 + d2/dz2
= 3d version due to moving e- in more directions.
for the H atom,, is V’ = 0
nopeeee
why isnt V’=0 for the Hatom
bc theres potential between the nuc and the e- bc theyre opposite charges.
what is V’ for the hydrogen atom
= -Ze^2 / 4nEo x 1/r
Z = nuc charge
e = charge on e-
n = pi
Eo = vacuum permittivity (amount of screening//screaming done between the nuc and the e-)
r = electron - nuc distance.
the charge is a constant
dont rememeber this -
1/r = distance
Z for H =
1
Z for He =
2
what does the V’.nuc-el acc depend on
the variable part of the equation we dont need to memorise
aka 1/r
where r is the distance between the nuc and the e-.
this is the only thing that changes the V’.nuc-el.
distance getting larger = smaller V.
distance getting closer = larger V
isotropic meaning
same in all directions
V’ is the same in all directions : as long as the distance is the same
when do we use spherical // polar coordinates
when a value is isotropic aka it doesnt change with direction //angle.
instead of Y(x,y,z) we use Y(r,o|, 0-)
r = distance
other things = 2 angles.
which hamiltonian operator can we find // try to find now that we know V is isotropic
we try find the Y(r,o|, o-) one
we can find it bc we can split it up into radial part and angular part.
what can we separate the isotropic wavefunction into Y(r,o|,o-)
radial part: R(r)
angular part: Y(o|, o-)
this is not an approx!!
we can figure out each one separately.!! due to using the polar spherical coordinatesssss
okay so now that we can separate the angular and radial parts of the wavefunction,, how does this effect the schrodinger equation
we now get 2 schrodinger equation:
H’.rad Y.rad = E.rad Y.rad
radial schrodinger. energy we get from moving e- away from nuc!!! solved via analytical solutions: we can find a radial hamiltonian, find eiganfunctions and eigenvalues!!
and the angular one aswelllll
Y. rad looks like what
-e^ beta.r
or smt like that
looks like an exponential!!
Y.rad against r graph gives what
gives an exponential!
e^-Br (beta)
where r is the distance between the nuc and the e-.
r is always larger or equal to 0
so its an eigenfunction,, finite, normalised, single valued and continuous
its literally just a slope down
what form do radial wavefunctions have + what are solutions dependent on + how are these expressed
R(r) = (polynomial in r ) x e^-Br
solutions are dependent on the angular momentum ,, expressed in the Laguerre polynomial
have we solved the radial schrodinger equation
yes!!
we found that Y.rad = e^-Br
weve solved it and found eigenfunctions
we then get eigen values which give us energy!!
what gives us E in schrodinger equation
the eigenvalues