4.1 Religious Language: Symbol and Analogy Flashcards
What are potential problems with talking about God and religious language?
- Religious language may be meaningless as RL **is not objective truth **
- RL may be non- cognitive meaning logical positivists would say that it’s meaningless as it is unverifiable
- RL anthropomorphises God
Features of cognitive (realist) language
Factual statements that can be proven
e.g the king is head of the state
Features of non-cognitive (anti-realist) langauge
Deals with statements that are meant to be taken factually but are to be understood in different ways
Statements that express a religious truth within a religious community but may not be meaningful to someone outside the community
e.g ‘Jesus is the son of God’
Argument for RL
It would render a lot of what we talk about as measningless if we didn’t use non-cognitive languag; goes beyond physical experience
Argument against RL
Non-cognitive language cannot be universally understood or proven
What does Via negativa mean?
The truth about God can be discovered by speaking of ‘What God is not’
e.g not physical…
Advantages of Via Negativa
Avoids the pitfalls of using adequate human language (easier to say what God is not rather than assuming what he is)
Disadvantages of Via Negativa
Becomes atheism- to asy that God can only be spoken in negatives means denying the existence of God altogether
Fails to say anything meaningful about what God is
What is univocal language?
Languag meaning the same thing in all situations
e.g black hat, black cat, black shirt
What is equivocal language?
Language meaning different things in different situations
e.g tree bark, dog’s bark
Advantages of univocal language
Makes God accessible and understandable
We know the nature of God’s love because we understand human love
Disadvantages of univocal language
It anthropomorphises God
Advantages of equivocal language
Stresses the distincitveness of God’s qualities
Doesn’t anthropomorphise God
Disadvantages of equivocal language
It makes God so different that it is difficult/ impossible to understand God
Who comes up with analogic language?
Thomas Aquinas