3.2 Mangers, leadership and decision making Flashcards
Role of Managers
Setting objectives
Analyse & review performance
Leading
Making decisions
Levels of management - SENIOR MANAGEMENT
E.g. Board of Directors
Set corporate objectives & strategic direction
Levels of management - MIDDLE MANAGEMENT
Accountable to senior management
Run business functions and departments
Levels of management - JUNIOR MANAGEMENT
Supervisory role, accountable to middle management
Monitor & control day-to-day tasks, and manage teams of workers
Leadership styles - AUTOCRATIC
Authoritarian leadership
Assumes info and decision making are best kept at top management of organisation
Characterised by:
- 1 one way communication
- minimal delegation or decentralisation
- close supervision of employees
Advantages of autocratic
Quick decision-making especially in stress-filled situations –> relieves pressure amongst employees
Disadvantages of autocratic
Discourages group input –> decreased motivation
Hurts morale and leads to resentment –> dissatisfaction
Ignores creative solutions and expertise from subordinates
Leader can feel overwhelmed
Leadership styles - DEMOCRATIC
Decisions agreed by majority
Characterised by:
-Collaboration –> employees share ideas & opinions
-employee engagement
- increased creativity
Advantages of democratic
Greater innovation –> creativity/ideas
Group member commitment –> job satisfaction
High labour productivity, increased motivation
Disadvantages of democratic
Poor decisions by unskilled employees
Slow decision making
Leadership styles - LAISSEZ-FAIRE
‘Let it be’
Characterised by:
- Hands-off approach
- Decisions are left to employees
Advantages of laissez faire
Encourages personal growth –> facilitates employee growth and development –> increased motivation
Encourages innovation –> greater employee freedom so creativity
Faster decision-making –> no micromanagement, employees have autonomy to go forward with decisions w/o approval
Disadvantages of Laissez-faire
Organisation lacks sense of direction
Leaders don’t take accountability –> avoid responsibility
Leaders have poor involvement within the group –> lack of cohesiveness
Stages of Tannenbaum Schmidt Continuum
Four Main Styles of Leadership:
1) Tell - leader identifies problems, makes decisions & announces it to subordinates –> expects implementation
2) Sells - leader identifies problems, still makes decision but attempts to overcome resistance through discussion & persuasion
3) Consults - leader identifies problem, presents to subordinates, listens to advice & suggestions before making a decision
4) Joins - leader defines the problem, but subordinates find solutions and decisions within limits of defined superior
Tannenbaum Schmidt Continuum - LEFT & RIGHT SIDES EXPLAINED
Left = Manager centred leadership, autocratic, degree of authority
Right = Subordinate centred leadership, democratic, area of freedom
Advantages of Tannenbaum Schmidt Continuum
Gives multiple ways with how to involve and interact with your team, allowing you to become more democratic
Provides an incremental way to increase or reduce your team’s involvement in decision making.
Disadvantages of Tannenbaum Schmidt Continuum
No ‘correct’ way of managing groups –> ambiguity for the user of the model
Only examines the process of giving a task to your team, not what happens next- DOESNT show full picture
Blake Mouton Grid
Top Left - Country Club
Bottom Left - Impoverished
Top Right - Team
Bottom Right - Produce/Perish
Middle - Middle of Road
Blake Mouton Grid - Axis
Y axis - People
X axis - Task
Blake Mouton Grid - explained
Country Club - high people & low task, concerned about needs and feelings of others, work environment is likely to be relaxed but work may suffer due to lack of control
Impoverished - low people & low task, ineffective leader, work and people are both neglected
Team - high people & high task, employees are motivated and needs are met
Produce/Perish - high task & low people, v authoritarian, tasks are always done matter the implications for employees
Middle - some focus on task and people, average performance
Advantages of Blake Mouton Grid
Used by managers to increase productivity
Helps leaders understand their natural leadership style –> and allows the necessary changes to be made if needed
Disadvantages of Blake Mouton Grid
The model is overly simplistic
Too focussed on the leader –> doesn’t pay attention to other factors e.g. development level of your team, the businesses culture etc.