31 - Bone Grafts 1 - Hunter - DONE Flashcards
Should I do intramarrow penetration when I am doing grafting?
Yes you should.
Crea found OFD alone vs OFD + intramarrow penetration had 2x the radiographic bone fill in the mandible compared to OFD alone.
According to faculty as long the defect is bleeding on its own thats adequate. Faculty said it is difficult to do the amount and extent of intramarrow penetrations that they did here
What is osseous coagulum? What was the idea of using coagulum?
Robinson. Intraoral cortical bone dust that collects in the oral site while you are working. It mixes with the patients blood. Idea that autogenous bone is a readily available source if doing osseous surgery.
What is bone blending?
Diem.
When you put collected autogenous bone in an amalgam capsule and triturate it to decrease the particle size. Reported particle size is 0.2 mm.
Froum showed that this is better than OFD alone
What is the difference between defect resolution and % bone fill?
Defect resolution - takes into account crestal resorption as well as regeneration of bone
% bone fill - does not take crestal resorption into acount
Can you use intraoral cancellous bone as a graft for intrabony defects?
Hiatt showed the the maxillary tuberosity, healing extraction sites, and edentulous areas are viable sites of cancellous bone to use as graft material.
This bone did not do as well as iliac grafts in furcation defects only. Same result in vertical defects.
Talk about using a healed extraction site for a source of bone grafting in vertical defects.
Soehren gave recommendations in a review paper. Stated that the optimal time to enter the donor site is 6 to14 weeks post-extraction (depending upon any healing complications, where later is better). Gingiva over the site needs to be free of inflammation
First 6 weeks allow for clot retraction, clot reorganization and primary ossification. Based on clinical experience, the authors recommend 8 weeks for the maxilla and 12 weeks for the mandible due to the difference in blood supply. Harvest of the graft is accomplished by curettage of the socket contents with a Kirkland 13 and 14.
Evian (THIS WAS ASKED IN CASE PRES) looked at the histology of healing extraction sites to determine the optimal times to use it in autogenous grafting.
BL: 2 distinct phases of bone healing.
From 4-8 weeks, a very active osteogenic phase with many osteogenic cells and immature bone formation. After 8 weeks, osteogenesis slows down as the bone volume has increased and the bone starts maturing. By 12-16 weeks, the trabeculae are mature with little osteiod and few bone cells.
It is not known if it’s the osteogenic property or the “scaffolding” property is more advantageous for new bone formation. However, bone from the 8-12 week period contains elements of both.
Talk about using autogenous iliac bone grafts in vertical bone defects
Dragoo studied iliac bone grafts. He found that they do achieve regeneration. They are an osteogenic material because they have live cells in them. However, Dragoo detect root resorption at a 2.8% incidence. He said that it was associated with gingival inflammation and patients with meticulous home care would not have root resorption.
What diseases are human cellular and tissue donors screened for?
Tissues are screened for various bacteria and fungi, antibodies to HIV-1, HIV-2, HTLV-1, HTLV-2, HBcAb, HCVAb, and syphilis antibody.
In addition, testing is conducted for the HIV and hepatitis C virus as well as HBsAg (hepatitis B surface antigen.)
What type of processing does bone donor material go through? Does it take care of certain diseases?
DFDBA generally includes: soft tissue stripping, initial size reduction, initial cleansing and decontamination, microbiological treatment, freezing, dehydration, secondary size reduction, demineralization, buffering, final rinse, packaging, and terminal sterilization.
The process for FDBA is a little shorter as it does not include demineralization, buffering, or a final rinse.
These processing steps for DFDBA have been demonstrated to inactivate HIV, HBV, HCV, CMV and poliovirus.
What citation would you use to defend antibiotic use after bone grafting?
Sanders was looking at the results of FDBA in periodontal defects. T
Complete or >50% osseous regeneration was seen in 85% of grafted sites following the use of post-operative antibiotics (vs. only 38% of sites when antibiotics were not prescribed). For both groups, a significant difference in osseous regeneration was noted with antibiotics, intramarrow penetration and endodontically untreated teeth.
There was an apparent enhancement of the FDBA’s clinical success through the addition of autogenous bone for the treatment of 1,2 or wide 3 wall defects and furcation defects.
Can you use FDBA instead of DFDBA to treat periodontal defects?
Tsao says yes
Partial bone fill was obtained using mineralized bone allograft with and without GTR. Vertical bone fill was improved to a greater extent than horizontal bone fill.
Can you use mineralized cancellous bone allograft for periodontal regeneration?
Yes, Koylass found that that periodontal regeneration is possible using MCBA (mineralized cancellous bone allograft, PUROS) is possible.
Can I use cortical DFDBA to treat an osseous defect?
Mellonig
Cortical DFDBA shows bone fill in periodontal defects
Rosenberg came up with the threshold for success if greater than 50% bone fill
Do patients that have donor bone in them create HLA antibodies against the HLA-incompatible donor bone?
Quattlebaum
No, FDBA lacks clinically significant antigenicity
Can we achieve periodontal regeneration without using grafting material?
MEALEY said that the Bowers studies are very important
Yes, BOWERS found significantly greater regeneration of new attachment apparatus and individual tissues in a submerged environment compared to a nonsubmerged environment after scaling and root planing. WITH NO GRAFT MATERIAL
THIS IS A HENNAH STUDY
Will DFDBA enhance the amount of formation of a new attachment apparatus and component tissues?
IMPT - BOWERS HENNAH STUDY
There was a significant difference in the amount of new bone formed in DFDBA grafted defects vs no graft at all in submerged environment. In addition, more cementum formation occurred in grafted sites than in nongrafted, but the difference was not significant. Fibers of the PDL were more often oriented parallel to the root surface in grafted sites vs. both perpendicular and parallel in nongrafted sites.
Will DFDBA enhance the frequency of formation of a new attachment apparatus and component tissues?
IMPT - BOWERS HENNAH STUDY
There was a greater chance for regeneration of a new attachment apparatus in submerged, grafted defects vs. non-grafted defects. In grafted sites, new bone formation was observed coronal to the calculus reference notch in all sites. Nongrafted sites had more CT regeneration compared to the grafted sites.
Are root resorption, ankylosis, or pulp death common sequelae of grafting with DFDBA?
No - There was no evidence of extensive root resorption, ankylosis or pulp death in either type of specimen.
So if you have an intrabony defect how would you decide to treat it?
Bowers found that:
OVERALL, There is significantly more new attachment apparatus, including cementum and new bone, and a greater chance for regeneration of a new attachment apparatus in submerged intrabony defects grafted with DFDBA vs. nongrafted sites.
Do we have histologic evidence that DFDBA encourages reattachment?
Yes. Bowers found in studies that DFDBA had new attachment above the calculus reference notch either CT or JE. IN their studies *no new attachment was observed in any of the non-grafted sites
In grafting intrabony defects is it helpful to close the site with a soft tissue autograft to prevent apical migration of the epithelium?
Bowers found that No, free gingival grafts did not retard epithelial apical migration and did not enhance regeneration
Does smoking influence the long term outcome of intrabony defects treated with regenerative therapy?
Rosen found that Smoking was significant associated with a decrease in CAL gain and a decrease in PD reduction compared to nonsmokers
What happens to the DFDBA after healing in intrabony defects?
Reynolds and Bowers: In histologic studies 72% of the grafted sites still had DFDBA particles 6 months afterwards which were “amalgamated” within new viable bone.
Sites that had residual graft particles had significantly greater amounts of new attachment apparatuses than sites w/o residual graft
Is it helpful to add tetracycline to intrabony sites treated with DFDBA?
Masters found that there was no benefit gained by adding tetracycline to DFDBA when grafting osseous defects