28 - Principles of Surgery II Mike Flashcards
Systematic review for root surface modifiers
Mariotti 2003
BL: Citric acid, tetracycline, and EDTA provide no clinically significant benefit in terms of regeneration
Citric acid: 4/8 histology studies showed regeneration
Tetracycline: 1 histology study w/ 3/7 showing regeneration
EDTA: No histologic studies
Histologic animal study for attachment to roots with citric acid
Polson 1983
BL: With application of citric acid, fibrin linked to exposed root collagen fibrils to allow new CT attachment rather than apical migration of epithelium
- Squirrel monkeys
- Teeth extracted and rinsed with citric acid or saline and re-implanted. Teeth examined at 1/3/7/21 days
Histologic human study for attachment to roots with citric acid
Cole 1980
BL: Citric acid on root planed periodontally involved roots induced formation of CT attachment to dentin
- Notch at apical extent of calculus
- OFD + citric acid, extraction at 4 months for evaluation
- JE 1.2-2.6mm above notch. Bone level increase 0.8mm
Effect of etching agents on periodontal tissues
Blomlof 1995
BL: Citric acid and orthophosphoric acid (low pH) have necrotizing effect on periodontal tissue at 20 seconds and 3 minutes. EDTA no necrosis
- Monkey study
- Measured with lactate dehydrogenase, a marker for cellular activity
Effect of EDTA on smear layer
Blomlof 1997
BL: EDTA sufficiently removes HA smear layer and preserves collagen fibers
- Smear layer 2-10um w/ no difference using ultrasonic/curette/bur
- EDTA removed smear layer the same for the 3 treatment modalities
Systematic review for efficacy of diode laser in conjunction w/ SRP
Slot 2014
BL: No significant difference in periodontal parameters with SRP/diode compared to SRP alone
-Some studies showed BOP were improved w/ diode, but effect was small and not clinically relevant
Histologic response to LANAP
Yukna 2007
BL: 6 single rooted periodontally involved teeth had a positive histologic response to LANAP, PD reduction, and CAL gain
-Tx then EXT at 3 months
-PD reduction 4.7mm vs 3.7mm
CAL gain 4.2mm vs 2.4mm
-New cementum and CT attachment
***Funded by Millennium Dental Technology
What is the LANAP protocol and what laser is used?
Nd:YAG laser (Periolase)
- Occlusal adjustment + splint mobile teeth
- Laser to remove pocket lining
- SRP/ultrasonic for root debridement
- Laser to seal pocket and form clot
What does LANAP stand for?
Laser Assisted New Attachment Procedure
Second histologic study for LANAP
Nevins 2012
BL: LANAP can result in periodontal regeneration and improve periodontal parameters
- TX, monthly maintenance, EXT at 9 months
- 12 defects in healthy, non-smokers
- CAL gain 3.8mm, PD reduction 5.4mm, recession 2.7mm
- Regeneration 5/10
- Long JE 4/10
Who is the man or woman behind LANAP who is probably a millionaire because of it?
Yukna
Critical probing depth for CAL gain in LANAP is _____ according to ______
4.88mm
Nevins
Should Er:YAG laser be used as a monotherapy or adjunct to SRP
Zhao 2014
Systematic review
Answer = NO
BL: No SS difference in clinical outcomes when using Er:YAG as a monotherapy or adjunct compared to SRP alone.
-Had results up to a 12 month follow-up
Should lasers be used as an adjunct to surgical therapy?
Behdin 2015
Systematic review + meta-analysis
Answer: NO
BL: No SS difference in PD/CAL gain/recession for OFD and GTR w/ or w/o a laser. When considering OFD/Emdogain, there was a significant difference for PD reduction and CAL gain
Should lasers be used for implant surface decontamination?
Mailoa 2014
Systematic review and meta-analysis
BL: Similar results for PD reduction, CAL gain, and X-ray bone fill for CO2 and Er:YAG lasers
- 4 human surgery studies, 3 human non-surgery studies. NO difference for laser vs control
- Animal studies showed greater CAL gain and higher bone-to-implant contact in rough surface implants vs smooth surface