17 - Implants 1 Flashcards
IAN loop
Ritter
31% overall
Males slightly higher
Average 1.6mm
Biggest 4.6mm
Mental foramen distance from crest of ridge without atrophy
12.4mm
Suggested horizontal distance between implants
Tarnow - machined implants >3mm apart
Siqueira - horizontal distance 4mm or greater
Suggested alveolar crest to contact point for papilla presence
Implant/tooth - <4.5mm (Salama)
Implant/implant - <3.5mm (Tarnow)
Implant/pontic - <5.5mm (Salama)
How tall is the papilla between 2 implants?
Tarnow - 3.4mm, with a range of 1-7mm
What is the biologic width around implants
Cochran - 3.08mm
Kan Joe - 3.63mm in maxillary anterior buccal
**Level of interproximal papilla is dependent on the bone level of the adjacent tooth and independent of bone level next to implant
What are the old implant success criteria
Albrektsson
Non-mobile
No radiolucency
<0.2mm/year RBL 1 year after loading
No pain/infection
How do implants compare to FDPs?
Torabinejad - 6+ year success is endo 84%, implant 95%, and FDP 80%
Salinas - 5 year success in implant 95%, FDP 84%, and FDP 94% when exclude resin bonded prostheses
What is the prevalence of peri-implantitis and mucositits?
Atieh
With a definition of PD 5mm or greater and RBL 2mm or greateror 3 threads exposed
Mucositis: Subject 63%, implant 30%
Implantitis: Subject 18%, implant 9%
What is the definition of peri-implantitis in the new classification?
Bleeding/suppuration
Increased PD compared to previous exam
Bone loss beyond remodeling
In the absence of previous exam, BOP/suppuration, PD 6mm or greater, bone level 3mm or greater from implant platform
What is the definition of peri-implant mucositis in the classification?
Bleeding/suppuration
No increase in PD compared to previous exam
No bone loss beyond remodeling
When is the likely onset of peri-implantitis? How does it progress?
Derks
81% within 3 years
Non-linear, accelerated bone loss
What are site and subject level factors for peri-implantitis?
Kumar
PI 1.5 or greater Offset placement of restoration on fixture Platform depth 6mm or greater from tooth Tooth loss due to ChP ChP on adjacent teeth Smoker A1C 6 or greater
Is a history of periodontitis a risk factor for peri-implantitis?
Yes
SLA implants in patients with no ChP or treated ChP there was a survival of 96.6% vs 90% (ROCUZZO).
GAP, the RR was 4 for failure rate in a SR (MONJE)
Even with maintenance a history of ChP has a WMD of 0.50mm RBL (LIN)
Is smoking a risk factor for peri-implantitis?
YES
SR MA, 3/4 studies with worse treatment outcomes in smokers (HEITZ-MAYFIELD)
Often implicated in smooth surface implants (BALSHE)
Is glycemic control a risk factor for implantitis?
Kumar - A1C >6 YES
Shi - A1C <8 vs 7-14. NO
Is osteoporosis a risk factor for peri-implantitis?
NO
With a 3+ year exposure to oral BP, no difference in implant complications (FUGAZZATTO)
With a T-score less than -2, survival 91% vs 100% (NOT SS) (TEMMERMAN)
Is HIV a risk factor for peri-implantitis?
With a preplacemnet CD4% <20%, protease inhibitor, smoking, or anterior maxilla
Controlled HIV, no difference
SABBAH
Is radiation a risk factor for peri-implantitis?
> 45 grays
Disruption of blood supply
Periosteum loses cellularity/vascularity
Hematopoietic proliferation sparse in BM
COLELLA
What medications are implicated in peri-implant failure
PPI OR 2
SSRI OR 3
BP OR 1.2
CHAPPUIS
SSRI mechanism with peri-implant failure
Increase osteoclast differentiation due to increased peripheral serotonin levels
Sertraline/Zoloft implicated (CARR)
PPI mechanism with peri-implant failure
Inhibit H/K pump
Alter bone homeostasis and calcium metabolism
Failure 2% vs 5.5% (URSOMANNO)
Is age a factor in implant placement?
NO
Srinivasan
How are titanium particles implicated in peri-implantitis?
Particles 2-8um, phagocytized and inflammatory reaction
Peri-implantitis implants with greater PI/PD/GI and mean titanium levels when adjusted for amount of plaque (SAFIOTI)
Increased titanium particles wtih stainless steel, titanium, or PEEK scaler in vitro (HARRELL)
What is the effect of cover screw perforation?
Higher prevalence of MBL of 2mm
Impinge BW
VAN ASSCHE
Describe the association between excess cement and peri-implantitis
In a private practice endoscopic study, 100% of implants with peri-implant disease and overall 81% with excess cement. 75% recovery after get rid of excess cement (WILSON)
Methacrylate 61% with excess cement and 100% suppuration with excess cement. Temp-Bond (ZOE) 0% excess cement, no suppuration because it washes out over time (KORSCH)
What is the effect of vestibular depth on implants?
Shallow vestibule <4mm risk-indicator for peri-implant disease due to greater recession, RBL, BOP, GI, and lower KMW
HALPERI-STERNFELD